Shasha Li

Dr. Shasha Li


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2024 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Chao GaoChao Gao
Chao Gao
SLShasha Li
Shasha Li
MSMaopeng Sun
Maopeng Sun
XZXiyang Zhao
Xiyang Zhao
Dewen LiuDewen Liu
Dewen Liu
Urbanization has profoundly reshaped the patterns and forms of modern urban landscapes. Understanding how urban transportation and mobility are affected by spatial planning is vital. Urban vibrancy, as a crucial metric for monitoring urban development, contributes to data-driven planning and sustainable growth. However, empirical studies on the relationship between urban vibrancy and the built environment in European cities remain limited, lacking consensus on the contribution of the built environment. This study employs Munich as a case study, utilizing night-time light, housing prices, social media, points of interest (POIs), and NDVI data to measure various aspects of urban vibrancy while constructing a comprehensive assessment framework. Firstly, the spatial distribution patterns and spatial correlation of various types of urban vibrancy are revealed. Concurrently, based on the 5Ds built environment indicator system, the multi-dimensional influence on urban vibrancy is investigated. Subsequently, the Geodetector model explores the heterogeneity between built environment indicators and comprehensive vibrancy along with its economic, social, cultural, and environmental dimensions, elucidating their influence mechanism. The results show the following: (1) The comprehensive vibrancy in Munich exhibits a pronounced uneven distribution, with a higher vibrancy in central and western areas and lower vibrancy in northern and western areas. High-vibrancy areas are concentrated along major roads and metro lines located in commercial and educational centers. (2) Among multiple models, the geographically weighted regression (GWR) model demonstrates the highest explanatory efficacy on the relationship between the built environment and vibrancy. (3) Economic, social, and comprehensive vibrancy are significantly influenced by the built environment, with substantial positive effects from the POI density, building density, and road intersection density, while mixed land use shows little impact. (4) Interactions among built environment factors significantly impact comprehensive vibrancy, with synergistic interactions among the population density, building density, and POI density generating positive effects. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing the resource allocation and functional layout in Munich, emphasizing the complex spatiotemporal relationship between the built environment and urban vibrancy while offering crucial guidance for planning.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Chao GaoChao Gao
Chao Gao
XLXinyi Lai
Xinyi Lai
SLShasha Li
Shasha Li
ZCZhiwei Cui
Zhiwei Cui
Zhiyou LongZhiyou Long
Zhiyou Long
With the rapid pace of global urbanization, understanding the impact of the urban built environment on travel behavior has become increasingly significant for developing sustainable and efficient transportation systems. This study conducts a bibliometric review of related research over the past two decades (1997–2023), utilizing 1745 publications from the Web of Science database through network analysis and content analysis. It provides a comprehensive quantitative analysis encompassing publication trends, national and institutional collaborations, and keyword evolution clustering perspectives. The results reveal that (1) academic interest in exploring the implications of the urban built environment on travel behavior has grown markedly, especially in the past decade, with emerging technological approaches and research perspectives; (2) the USA, P.R.CHINA, and the United Kingdom are major research forces in this field, with notable contributions from research institutions in P.R.CHINA and the USA; (3) the “Transportation Research Part” series journals demonstrate extensive influence both in terms of publication count and citation count; (4) through keyword co-occurrence network analysis, three development stages along with five major clusters were identified: travel behavior modeling and public health, active transportation and sustainable development, urban development and carbon emissions, land use and transportation integration, and urban transportation systems and machine learning. Overall, sustained research remains warranted within this field, particularly focusing on selecting new built environment metrics while integrating emerging technologies into travel behavior modeling frameworks. The insights from this study have implications for urban transportation planning and policy, offering guidance on future research directions and policymaking.

5 November 2025 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Chao GaoChao Gao
Chao Gao
SLShasha Li
Shasha Li
HBHanchuan Bao
Hanchuan Bao
YZYilin Zhang
Yilin Zhang
The coordinated development of Production-Living-Ecological (PLE) spaces has emerged as a core challenge for regional sustainability amid rapid urbanization processes. This study examines the Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration (2001–2021) using an integrated Markov-PLUS model coupled with Random Forest algorithms and 17 driving factors to construct 4 policy scenarios for future projections. The results reveal dramatic spatial restructuring: living space expanded 73.89% while production and ecological spaces contracted 7.47% and 8.94%. Evolution occurred through four distinct phases—rapid expansion, structural adjustment, quality improvement, and green transformation—each corresponding to national policy transitions with regional lags. Driving mechanism analysis identified environmental factors contributing 45–55% of variance, population density driving 24.2% of living space expansion, and elevation thresholds constraining urban growth above 1000 m. Multi-scenario simulations revealed fundamental trade-offs: urban development scenarios achieved 55.34% built-up expansion but sacrificed 15.4% ecological space, while ecological protection scenarios maintained 92% food production capacity with optimal connectivity (0.63) and maximum carbon storage (1287 Mt C). Model validation achieved exceptional accuracy (Kappa = 0.91, FoM = 0.24). This research emphasizes three strategic imperatives: (1) differentiated spatial governance (urban priority in cores, farmland protection in plains, ecological restoration in mountains); (2) temporal coordination mechanisms accounting for 3–5-year policy transmission lags; (3) adaptive management approaches addressing nonlinear evolution characteristics. This framework provides scientific foundations for balancing economic development, food security, and ecological protection in rapidly urbanizing regions.

11 October 2025 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLShasha Li
Shasha Li
Chao GaoChao Gao
Chao Gao
The successful implementation of digital transformation initiatives depends critically on public trust in experts guiding these processes. In today’s digital media environment, expert trust faces significant challenges, potentially hindering sustainable innovation adoption. This study investigates how expert credibility dimensions and information characteristics shape trust in digital transformation experts among Chinese social media users. We employed a mixed-methods approach combining a survey of 850 Chinese social media users, a quasi-experiment testing a digital expert verification feature, and secondary data analysis. The study measured multiple dimensions of expert trust while examining relationships with expert cognition factors and media usage variables through regression, mediation, and structural equation modeling. Expert trust in digital transformation exists at moderate levels (M = 6.82/10), with higher trust in digital innovation research (M = 7.12) than specific sustainability recommendations (M = 6.59). Expert authenticity emerged as the strongest predictor of trust (β = 0.27), followed by professional competence (β = 0.21). A “digital exposure paradox” emerged whereby higher volumes of expert information negatively predicted trust (β = −0.18), while information quality positively predicted trust (β = 0.25). The digital verification feature causally enhanced trust (DID = 0.57), with institutional sources strengthening trust while user-generated content diminished it. The findings reveal that digital transformation expert trust involves multi-dimensional evaluations beyond traditional credibility assessments. The “digital exposure paradox” suggests that prioritizing information quality over quantity, demonstrating expert authenticity, and implementing verification mechanisms can enhance trust and accelerate sustainable digital transformation adoption.