Intermittent fasting (IF) and caloric restriction (CR) are dietary strategies to prevent and attenuate obesity associated with conditions and aging-related outcomes. This scoping review examined the cardiometabolic, cancer, and neurocognitive outcome differences between IF and CR interventions among adults. We applied a systematic approach to scope published randomized controlled trials (databases: PubMed, CINAHL Plus, PsychInfo, Scopus, and Google Scholar) from inception through August 2023. The initial search provided 389 unique articles which were critically appraised. Thirty articles met the eligibility criteria for inclusion: 12 were IF, 10 were CR, and 8 were combined IF and CR interventions. IF and CR were associated with weight loss; however, IF studies tended to report greater adherence compared with CR. Overall, IF and CR were equivalently effective across cardiometabolic, cancer, and neurocognitive outcomes. Our findings suggest that IF has health benefits in a variety of conditions and may be better accepted and tolerated than CR, but more comparative research is required.

Introduction: Greater than 40% of women are obese, a key risk factor for cardiometabolic, neurocognitive disease, mood disorders, and certain cancers. Obesity and unfavorable body composition can compromise physical and psychological health and well-being. Preliminary evidence demonstrates Meditative Movement (i.e., Tai Chi Easy) improves health outcomes and body composition among midlife/older women. This single-group pilot study explored relationships between well-being predictors related to body composition and associated behavioral risk factors in midlife/older women pre-to-post Tai Chi Easy intervention. Methods: Eligible women 45–75 years old, participated in once-weekly 30-minute Tai Chi Easy classes over 8-weeks. Pre/post-intervention data included self-report surveys and on-site body composition. Multivariate linear regression models were fitted with putative predictor variables having correlations p-values of 0.20 or less with sleep quality and eating behaviors. Results: Participants (N = 36) (M age = 53.7) were White (80.4%) and attended ≥ 4 years of college (70.6%). Analyses resulted in one independent variable per model as a predictor of the dependent variables of sleep quality and emotional eating. Results indicated: (1) stress explained 13.4% sleep quality variance (F (2, 20) = 2.71, p = 0.09) and (2) self-compassion explained 42.1% emotional eating variance (F (2, 31) = 12.54, p < .01). Conclusion: Findings suggest stress and self-compassion partially explain variance in the dependent variables of sleep quality and emotional eating, both associated behavioral risk factors of body composition. Additional research may guide interventions to test efficacy and examine mediators to improve well-being predictors, body composition, and associated behavioral risk factors among midlife/older women.

Objective: Primary headache disorder is characterized by recurrent headaches which lack underlying causative pathology or trauma. Primary headache disorder is common and encompasses several subtypes including migraine. Vestibular migraine (VM) is a subtype of migraine that causes vestibular symptoms such as vertigo, difficulties with balance, nausea, and vomiting. Literature indicates subjective and performance-based cognitive problems (executive dysfunction) among migraineurs. This study compared the magnitude of the total effect size across neuropsychological domains to determine if there is a reliable difference in effect sizes between individuals with VM and healthy controls (HC). An additional aim was to meta-analyze neuropsychological outcomes in migraine subtypes (other than VM) in reference to healthy controls.Participants and Methods: This study was a part of a larger study examining neuropsychological functioning and impairment in individuals with primary headache disorder and HCs. Standardized search terms were applied in OneSearch and PubMed. The search interval covered articles published from 1986 to May 2021. Analyses were random-effects models. Hedge’s g was used as a bias-corrected estimate of effect size. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q and I2. Publication bias was assessed with Duval and Tweedie’s Trim-and-Fill method to identify evidence of missing studies.Results: The initial omnibus literature search yielded 6692 studies. Three studies (n=151 VM and 150 HC) met our inclusion criteria of having a VM group and reported neuropsychological performance. VM demonstrated significantly worse performance overall when compared to HCs (k=3, g=-0.99, p<0.001; Q=4.41, I2=54.66) with a large effect size. Within-domain effects of VM were: Executive Functioning=-0.99 (Q=0.62, I2=0), Screener=-1.15 (Q=3.29, I2=69.59), and Visuospatial/Construction=-1.47 (Q=0.001, I2=0.00). Compared to chronic migraine (k=3, g=-0.59, p<0.001; Q=0.68, I2=0.00) and migraine without aura (k=23, g=-0.39, p<0.001; Q=109.70, I2=79.95), VM was the only migraine subgroup to display a large effect size. Trim-and-fill procedure estimated zero VM studies to be missing due to publication bias (adjusted g=-0.99, Q=4.41).Conclusions: This initial attempt at a meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in VM was hampered by a lack of studies in this area. Based on our initial findings, individuals with VM demonstrated overall worse performances on neuropsychological tests compared to HCs with the greatest level of impairment seen in visuospatial/construction. Additionally, VM resulted in a large effect size while other migraine subtypes yielded small to moderate effect sizes. Despite the small sample of studies, the overall effect across neuropsychological performance was generally stable (i.e., low between-study heterogeneity). Given than VM accounts for 7% of patients seen in vertigo clinics and 9% of all migraine patients, our results suggest that neuropsychological impairment in VM deserves significantly more study.

INTRODUCTION: There is a growing proportion of Alzheimer's disease (AD) research participants identifying as two or more races; however, analyses primarily rely on monoracial categories, resulting in exclusion or recategorization of Multiracial participants. METHODS: We conducted semi‐structured qualitative interviews with 21 Multiracial adults to explore preferences and perceptions of racial categorization and reclassification in AD research. Recruitment prioritized diverse Multiracial identities, and interviews were evaluated using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants expressed varied preferences for racial categorization, with many assuming a monoracial standard. Preferences corresponded to both racial identity and assumed racial identification, and depended on available options. Participants responded to reclassification with calls for increased transparency about study methods and intended data usage, and concerns for racial misrepresentation. DISCUSSION: Findings underscore the utility of multiple questions and response options for racial categorization, researcher respect of participant experiences and the evolving nature of classification systems, and clear communication about analytic decisions.