Background and Objectives: Cervical cancer (CC) represents a significant health concern worldwide, particularly for younger women. Cold knife (CK) conization and carbon dioxide (CO₂) laser conization are two techniques commonly used to remove pre-invasive lesions, offering a potential curative intent in cases of incidental diagnosis of CC. This study aimed to assess the clinical implications and pathological outcomes of CK vs. CO₂ laser conization for pre-invasive lesions. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed women who underwent CO₂ or CK conization for high-grade preinvasive lesions (CIN2/3, CIS and AIS) between 2010 and 2022. Patient demographics, surgical details and pathological outcomes were collected. Pregnancy outcomes, including composite adverse obstetric rates, and oncological follow-up data, were also obtained. Results: In all, 1270 women were included; of them, 1225 (96.5%) underwent CO₂, and 45 (3.5%) underwent CK conization. Overall, the rate of positive endocervical or deep margins was lower with CO₂ laser compared to CK (4.3% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.015). Incidental CC was diagnosed in 56 (4.4%) patients, with 35 (62.5%) squamous and 21 (46.6%) adenocarcinomas. In a multivariate regression model, the relative risk for positive endocervical or deep margins is significantly greater in cases of incidental diagnosis of CC (p < 0.01). In cases of incidental diagnosis of CC, we found that the probabilities of having either positive endocervical or deep margins after CO₂ laser or CK conization are similar, with a higher risk in case of adenocarcinoma lesion. Among women with CC, 42 (75%) opted for radical treatment, while 14 (25%) underwent a follow-up. Only one woman (7.1%) in the follow-up group, who had undergone CK conization, experienced a composite adverse obstetric outcome. No recurrences were observed after a median follow-up of 53 months. Conclusions: CO₂ laser conization achieved a lower positive margin rate overall. CK and CO₂ conization appear to be equivalent oncological options for incidental CC.

Assessing lymph node metastasis is crucial in determining the optimal therapeutic approach for endometrial cancer (EC). Considering the impact of lymphadenectomy, there is an urgent need for a cost-effective and easily applicable method to evaluate the risk of lymph node metastasis in cases of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy failure. This retrospective monocentric study enrolled EC patients, who underwent surgical staging with nodal assessment. Data concerning demographic, clinicopathological, ultrasound, and surgical characteristics were collected from medical records. Ultrasound examinations were conducted in accordance with the IETA statement. We identified 425 patients, and, after applying exclusion criteria, the analysis included 313 women. Parameters incorporated into the nomogram were selected via univariate and multivariable analyses, including platelet count, myometrial infiltration, minimal tumor-free margin, and CA 125. The nomogram exhibited good accuracy in predicting lymph node involvement, with an AUC of 0.88. Using a cutoff of 10% likelihood of nodal involvement, the nomogram displayed a low false-negative rate of 0.04 (95% CI 0.00–0.19) in the training set. The adaptability of this straightforward model renders it suitable for implementation across diverse clinical settings, aiding gynecological oncologists in preoperative patient evaluations and facilitating the design of personalized treatments. However, external validation is mandatory for confirming diagnostic accuracy.

Background: ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer) has brought about the publication of the FIGO 2023 staging system with a significant impact in practice for endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: In this comparative study, we investigated the need for adjuvant treatment according to FIGO 2023, for each FIGO 2009 stage. We prospectively enrolled EC patients from June 2021 to June 2024, collected classical risk factors and classified according to FIGO 2009. Afterwards, we reclassified the same women according to FIGO 2023 and grouped them according to ESMO/ESTRO/ESGO risk factors. Results: We collected 211 eligible patients. We found 176 patients with FIGO 2009 I–II and 35 women with FIGO 2009 III–IV. Based on classic anatomopathological risk factors and FIGO 2009, adjuvant treatment was indicated in 124 (70.5%) patients with FIGO 2009 I–II (vaginal brachytherapy = 48; external beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy = 63; chemotherapy with external beam radiotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy = 13) and in 35 (100%) women with FIGO 2009 III–IV (all underwent chemotherapy). After FIGO 2023 re-staging, the women with early-stage EC, were more frequently candidates for no treatment, with a decreased relative risk (RR) for adjuvant treatment (RR 0.84; CI95% 0.74–0.95; p < 0.01) when compared to the previous FIGO classification. No significant risk (RR 1.01; CI95% 0.76–1.3; p = 0.08) for a more aggressive adjuvant treatment was noted after FIGO 2023 re-staging. In FIGO stage III–IV, no changes in the treatment modalities were observed. Conclusions: The re-staging according to FIGO 2023 of women previously staged to FIGO 2009 I–II, yields an RR of 0.84 to spare any type of adjuvant treatment.

Background: Lymph node metastasis in vulvar cancer is a critical prognostic factor associated with higher recurrence and decreased survival. A survival benefit is reported with adjuvant radiotherapy but with potential significant morbidity. We aim to clarify whether there is high-quality evidence to support the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in this setting.Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant radiotherapy to locoregional metastatic nodal areas.Search Methods: We conducted a comprehensive and systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the National Cancer Institute. We considered only randomized controlled trials (RCTs).Main Results: We identified 1,760 records and finally retrieved only one eligible RCT (114 participants with positive inguinofemoral lymph nodes). All women had undergone radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy and had been randomized to adjuvant radiotherapy or to intraoperative ipsilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy. At 6 years, the overall survival (OS) was 51% versus 41% in favor of radiotherapy (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.30–1.3) without significance and with very low certainty of evidence. At 6 year, the cumulative incidence of cancer-related deaths was 29% versus 51% in favor of adjuvant radiotherapy (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.28–0.87). Recurrence-free survival at 6 years was 59% after adjuvant radiotherapy versus 48% after pelvic lymphadenectomy (HR 0.39; 95% CI 0.17–0.88). Three (5.3%) versus 13 (24.1%) groin recurrences were noted, respectively, in the adjuvant radiotherapy and pelvic lymphadenectomy groups. There was no significant difference in acute toxicities for pelvic lymphadenectomy compared to radiotherapy. In women with positive pelvic lymph nodes (20%), the OS at 6 year was 36% compared with 13% in favor of adjuvant radiotherapy. Late cutaneous toxicity rate appeared to be greater after radiotherapy (19% vs. 15%) but with less chronic lymphedema (16% vs. 22%).Conclusion: There is only very low-quality evidence on administering adjuvant radiotherapy for inguinal lymph node metastases. Although the identified study was a multicenter RCT, there was a reasonable imprecision and inconsistency because of small study numbers, wide confidence intervals in the data, and early trial closure, resulting in downgrading of the evidence.

Uterine sarcomas are rare and aggressive gynecological malignancies. We evaluated the epidemiology, treatment outcomes and survival rates in uterine sarcoma patients managed in our institute. The medical records of women with histology proven uterine sarcoma, including leiomyosarcoma (LMS), adenosarcoma (ADS), and endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS), treated at our institution from February 2010 to February 2022, were analyzed. In total, 41 patients were identified. In detail, LMS, ADS, and high-grade and low-grade ESS were identified, respectively, in 60.9%, 19.5%, 12.1%, and 7.3% of the cases. The majority of women affected by LMS (72%) underwent primary surgery and 40% of them also received adjuvant chemotherapy. A surgical approach was the preferred mode of treatment in 83% of the recurrences. The median OS (overall survival), DFS (disease free survival), and PFS (progression free survival) for the LMS group were 25, 44.5, and 8 months, respectively. The 5-year survival rates for LMS, ADS, and ESS groups were 30.5%, 100% and 37.5%, respectively. The 5-year survival for LMS was found to be significantly worse than for other histology types (p = 0.016). Our study provides valuable data for the evaluation of treatment strategies and survival trends among these rare cancers. The management and follow-up planning of each subtype requires a thorough patient-focused multidisciplinary discussion.

Background/Objectives: Despite advances in targeted therapies, a substantial proportion of high-risk endometrial carcinomas (EC) do not respond to treatment and have a poor prognosis. The identification of prognostic and predictive biomarkers to improve patient stratification is therefore a clinical priority. L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) is a promising biomarker in EC; however, its soluble circulating form (sL1CAM) has been poorly investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic and predictive significance of sL1CAM in high-risk ECs. Methods: High-risk EC patients, treated with surgery and platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy, were retrospectively enrolled. sL1CAM levels were quantified in 72 preoperative serum samples by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: High sL1CAM levels were associated with advanced age and non-endometrioid histology. Across the entire patient cohort, higher sL1CAM concentrations significantly correlated with worse prognosis in terms of DSS and PFS in univariate (DSS: HR = 2.22, p = 0.028; PFS: HR = 1.21, p = 0.041) and multivariate (DSS: HR = 2.13, p = 0.041; PFS: HR = 1.93, p = 0.048) analyses. Stratification by histological type revealed a significant prognostic association only in the endometrioid subgroup, both in univariate and multivariate analyses. Moreover, in this subgroup, elevated sL1CAM levels were associated with shorter time to recurrence after chemotherapy, both in univariate (PFI: HR = 2.69, p = 0.027) and multivariate (PFI: HR = 2.97, p = 0.017) analysis, and significantly predicted relapse within 6 months (OR = 7.83, p = 0.027). Conclusions: sL1CAM is associated with poor prognosis in high-risk EC and seems to be associated with platinum response in endometrioid tumors. These findings support its potential role as a biomarker to improve risk stratification, warranting validation in larger, prospective studies.