Background. Uraemia and hypertension are associated with higher risk for cardiovascular complications. Endothelial dysfunction plays an important role in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases. The aim of the present study was to evaluate endothelial function in the forearm skin microcirculation of patients with essential hypertension, in hypertensive haemodialysis patients and in normotensive control subjects. Methods. We performed laser Doppler flowmetry with iontophoresis of acetylcholine (ACh) and of sodium nitroprusside (SNP) as well as the post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia test (PORH) in 16 normal control subjects (CONT), in 16 patients with essential hypertension (EHT) and in 16 haemodialysis patients with essential hypertension (DHT). Plasma levels of endothelin-1, big-endothelin and von Willebrand factor (vWF) were also measured. Results. The average hyperaemic response to the higher dose of ACh iontophoresis was 801±110% in CONT, 563±69 % in EHT and 308±64% in DHT (P<0.05, between all comparisons). Vasodilation to the higher dose of SNP was 791±79% in CONT, 633±72% in EHT and 355±69% in DHT (NS, P<0.001 compared with controls, respectively). The average peak flow during PORH was significantly lower in both the EHT and DHT groups compared with controls (294±39, 267±59 and 429±45%, respectively, P<0.05). Levels of endothelin-1, big endothelin, vWF and vWF activity were significantly higher in the DHT group (P<0.05, compared with controls). Conclusions. In hypertensive haemodialysis patients, both endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation was impaired. The observed increase in plasma markers of endothelial damage indicated a progression of vascular disease.

Socio-economic determinants of health (SDoH) include various nonmedical factors in the socio-economic sphere with a potentially significant impact on health outcomes. Their effects manifest through several mediators/moderators (behavioral characteristics, physical environment, psychosocial circumstances, access to care, and biological factors). Various critical covariates (age, gender/sex, race/ethnicity, culture/acculturation, and disability status) also interact. Analyzing the effects of these factors is challenging due to their enormous complexity. Although the significance of SDoH for cardiovascular diseases is well documented, research regarding their impact on peripheral artery disease (PAD) occurrence and care is less well documented. This narrative review explores to what extent SDoH are multifaceted in PAD and how they are associated with its occurrence and care. Additionally, methodological issues that may hamper this effort are addressed. Finally, the most important question, whether this association may contribute to reasonable interventions aimed at SDoH, is analyzed. This endeavor requires attention to the social context, a whole systems approach, multilevel-thinking, and a broader alliance that reaches out to more stakeholders outside the medical sphere. More research is needed to justify the power in this concept to improve PAD-related outcomes like lower extremity amputations. At the present time, some evidence, reasonable consideration, and intuitive reasoning support the implementation of various interventions in SDoH in this field.

OBJECTIVE The role of biochemical and functional markers of microvascular dysfunction to predict cardiovascular outcomes in nondialyzed chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear. In this prospective cohort study, we assessed whether biochemical [serum level of angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), asymmetric and symmetric dimethylarginin] and functional (laser Doppler flowmetry) measures of microvascular function predicted cardiovascular events, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in CKD patients. METHODS Postocclusive reactive hyperemia area (PORHHA), acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside-mediated flow changes were estimated by laser Doppler flowmetry, and Ang-2, asymmetric and symmetric dimethylarginin were assessed in 105 CKD patients at baseline. Multiple failure time Cox-regression analyses with backward elimination were performed to determine the predictors of the combined endpoint of cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events during a median of 66.6 (interquartile range 39.8-80.4) months of follow-up. RESULTS In univariate models lnAng-2 and lnPORHHA both predicted the cardiovascular outcome besides age, diabetes, baseline cardiovascular disease, brachial pulse pressure and log C-reactive protein. In multivariate analysis lnPORHHA [hazard ratio: 0.66 (95% confidence interval: 0.49-0.89) per ln(mU s)], age [1.03 (1.01-1.06) per year], log C-reactive protein [1.31 (1.06-1.64) per ln(mg/l)] and diabetes [3.33 (1.70-6.53)] remained significant predictors of the cardiovascular outcome, whereas lnAng-2 did not enter the model. Neither of the microvascular variables were an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. CONCLUSION Among the functional and biochemical microvascular parameters PORHHA seems to improve cardiovascular risk assessment in CKD. Nevertheless the robustness of traditional risk factors seems to outweigh the role of microvascular biomarkers on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events at this time.