Hendrik Marks

Dr. Hendrik Marks

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2012 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HMHendrik Marks
Hendrik Marks
TKTüzer Kalkan
Tüzer Kalkan
RMRoberta Menafra
Roberta Menafra
SDSergey Denissov
Sergey Denissov
KJKenneth Jones
Kenneth Jones
HSHendrik G. Stunnenberg
Hendrik G. Stunnenberg
Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells grown in serum exhibit greater heterogeneity in morphology and expression of pluripotency factors than ES cells cultured in defined medium with inhibitors of two kinases (Mek and GSK3), a condition known as "2i" postulated to establish a naive ground state. We show that the transcriptome and epigenome profiles of serum- and 2i-grown ES cells are distinct. 2i-treated cells exhibit lower expression of lineage-affiliated genes, reduced prevalence at promoters of the repressive histone modification H3K27me3, and fewer bivalent domains, which are thought to mark genes poised for either up- or downregulation. Nonetheless, serum- and 2i-grown ES cells have similar differentiation potential. Precocious transcription of developmental genes in 2i is restrained by RNA polymerase II promoter-proximal pausing. These findings suggest that transcriptional potentiation and a permissive chromatin context characterize the ground state and that exit from it may not require a metastable intermediate or multilineage priming.

1 September 2010 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMichiel Vermeulen
Michiel Vermeulen
HEH. Christian Eberl
H. Christian Eberl
FMFilomena Matarese
Filomena Matarese
HMHendrik Marks
Hendrik Marks
SDSergei Denissov
Sergei Denissov
MMMatthias Mann
Matthias Mann

1 September 2013 in Cell Stem Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EHEhsan Habibi
Ehsan Habibi
ABArie B. Brinkman
Arie B. Brinkman
JAJulia Arand
Julia Arand
LKLeonie I. Kroeze
Leonie I. Kroeze
HKHindrik H.D. Kerstens
Hindrik H.D. Kerstens
HSHendrik G. Stunnenberg
Hendrik G. Stunnenberg

30 March 2012 in Genome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABArie B. Brinkman
Arie B. Brinkman
HGHongcang Gu
Hongcang Gu
SBStefanie J.J. Bartels
Stefanie J.J. Bartels
YZYingying Zhang
Yingying Zhang
FMFilomena Matarese
Filomena Matarese
HSHendrik G. Stunnenberg
Hendrik G. Stunnenberg
Cross-talk between DNA methylation and histone modifications drives the establishment of composite epigenetic signatures and is traditionally studied using correlative rather than direct approaches. Here, we present sequential ChIP-bisulfite-sequencing (ChIP-BS-seq) as an approach to quantitatively assess DNA methylation patterns associated with chromatin modifications or chromatin-associated factors directly. A chromatin-immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-capturing step is used to obtain a restricted representation of the genome occupied by the epigenetic feature of interest, for which a single-base resolution DNA methylation map is then generated. When applied to H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), we found that H3K27me3 and DNA methylation are compatible throughout most of the genome, except for CpG islands, where these two marks are mutually exclusive. Further ChIP-BS-seq-based analysis in Dnmt triple-knockout (TKO) embryonic stem cells revealed that total loss of CpG methylation is associated with alteration of H3K27me3 levels throughout the genome: H3K27me3 in localized peaks is decreased while broad local enrichments (BLOCs) of H3K27me3 are formed. At an even broader scale, these BLOCs correspond to regions of high DNA methylation in wild-type ES cells, suggesting that DNA methylation prevents H3K27me3 deposition locally and at a megabase scale. Our strategy provides a unique way of investigating global interdependencies between DNA methylation and other chromatin features.

1 April 2017 in Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TKTüzer Kalkan
Tüzer Kalkan
NONelly Olova
Nelly Olova
MRMila Roode
Mila Roode
CMCarla Mulas
Carla Mulas
HLHeather Lee
Heather Lee
ASAustin Smith
Austin Smith
Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells are locked into self-renewal by shielding from inductive cues. Release from this ground state in minimal conditions offers a system for delineating developmental progression from naïve pluripotency. Here, we examine the initial transition process. The ES cell population behaves asynchronously. We therefore exploited a short-half-life Rex1::GFP reporter to isolate cells either side of exit from naïve status. Extinction of ES cell identity in single cells is acute. It occurs only after near-complete elimination of naïve pluripotency factors, but precedes appearance of lineage specification markers. Cells newly departed from the ES cell state display features of early post-implantation epiblast and are distinct from primed epiblast. They also exhibit a genome-wide increase in DNA methylation, intermediate between early and late epiblast. These findings are consistent with the proposition that naïve cells transition to a distinct formative phase of pluripotency preparatory to lineage priming.

1 February 2014 in Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SDSergei Denissov
Sergei Denissov
HHHelmut Hofemeister
Helmut Hofemeister
HMHendrik Marks
Hendrik Marks
AKAndrea Kranz
Andrea Kranz
GCGiovanni Ciotta
Giovanni Ciotta
ASA. Francis Stewart
A. Francis Stewart
Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me3) at the promoters of actively transcribed genes is a universal epigenetic mark and a key product of Trithorax group action. Here, we show that Mll2, one of the six Set1/Trithorax-type H3K4 methyltransferases in mammals, is required for trimethylation of bivalent promoters in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mll2 is bound to bivalent promoters but also to most active promoters, which do not require Mll2 for H3K4me3 or mRNA expression. By contrast, the Set1 complex (Set1C) subunit Cxxc1 is primarily bound to active but not bivalent promoters. This indicates that bivalent promoters rely on Mll2 for H3K4me3 whereas active promoters have more than one bound H3K4 methyltransferase, including Set1C. Removal of Mll1, sister to Mll2, had almost no effect on any promoter unless Mll2 was also removed, indicating functional backup between these enzymes. Except for a subset, loss of H3K4me3 on bivalent promoters did not prevent responsiveness to retinoic acid, thereby arguing against a priming model for bivalency. In contrast, we propose that Mll2 is the pioneer trimethyltransferase for promoter definition in the naïve epigenome and that Polycomb group action on bivalent promoters blocks the premature establishment of active, Set1C-bound, promoters.