Emanuele Pallozzi

Dr. Emanuele Pallozzi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2014 in Environmental and Experimental Botany
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GMGiovanni Marino
Giovanni Marino
EPEmanuele Pallozzi
Emanuele Pallozzi
Claudia CocozzaClaudia Cocozza
Claudia Cocozza
Roberto TognettiRoberto Tognetti
Roberto Tognetti
AGAlessio Giovannelli
Alessio Giovannelli
MCMauro Centritto
Mauro Centritto

28 April 2021 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Rocco PaceRocco Pace
Rocco Pace
GGGabriele Guidolotti
Gabriele Guidolotti
Chiara BaldacchiniChiara Baldacchini
Chiara Baldacchini
EPEmanuele Pallozzi
Emanuele Pallozzi
Rüdiger GroteRüdiger Grote
Rüdiger Grote
CCCarlo Calfapietra
Carlo Calfapietra
Trees and urban forests remove particulate matter (PM) from the air through the deposition of particles on the leaf surface, thus helping to improve air quality and reduce respiratory problems in urban areas. Leaf deposited PM, in turn, is either resuspended back into the atmosphere, washed off during rain events or transported to the ground with litterfall. The net amount of PM removed depends on crown and leaf characteristics, air pollution concentration, and weather conditions, such as wind speed and precipitation. Many existing deposition models, such as i-Tree Eco, calculate PM2.5 removal using a uniform deposition velocity function and resuspension rate for all tree species, which vary based on leaf area and wind speed. However, model results are seldom validated with experimental data. In this study, we compared i-Tree Eco calculations of PM2.5 deposition with fluxes determined by eddy covariance assessments (canopy scale) and particulate matter accumulated on leaves derived from measurements of vacuum/filtration technique as well as scanning electron microscopy combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (leaf scale). These investigations were carried out at the Capodimonte Royal Forest in Naples. Modeled and measured fluxes showed good overall agreement, demonstrating that net deposition mostly happened in the first part of the day when atmospheric PM concentration is higher, followed by high resuspension rates in the second part of the day, corresponding with increased wind speeds. The sensitivity analysis of the model parameters showed that a better representation of PM deposition fluxes could be achieved with adjusted deposition velocities. It is also likely that the standard assumption of a complete removal of particulate matter, after precipitation events that exceed the water storage capacity of the canopy (Ps), should be reconsidered to better account for specific leaf traits. These results represent the first validation of i-Tree Eco PM removal with experimental data and are a starting point for improving the model parametrization and the estimate of particulate matter removed by urban trees.

20 January 2019 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GGGabriele Guidolotti
Gabriele Guidolotti
EPEmanuele Pallozzi
Emanuele Pallozzi
OGOlga Gavrichkova
Olga Gavrichkova
ASAndrea Scartazza
Andrea Scartazza
MMMichele Mattioni
Michele Mattioni
CCCarlo Calfapietra
Carlo Calfapietra

20 June 2018 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGiuseppe Cristiano
Giuseppe Cristiano
EPEmanuele Pallozzi
Emanuele Pallozzi
GCGiulia Conversa
Giulia Conversa
Vincenzo TufarelliVincenzo Tufarelli
Vincenzo Tufarelli
Barbara De LuciaBarbara De Lucia
Barbara De Lucia
To assess the effect a new animal-derived biostimulant on the growth, root morphology, nitrogen content, leaf gas exchange of greenhouse potted snapdragon, three treatments were compared: (a) three doses of biostimulant (D): 0 (D0 or control), 0.1 (D0.1), and 0.2 g L−1 (D0.2); (b) two biostimulant application methods (M): foliar spray and root drenching; (c) two F1 Antirrhinum majus L. hybrids (CV): “Yellow floral showers” and “Red sonnet.” The treatments were arranged in a randomized complete-block design with four replicates, with a total of 48 experimental units. Plant height (+11%), number of shoots (+20%), total shoot length (+10%), number of leaves (+33%), total leaf area (+29%), and number of flowers (+59%) and total aboveground dry weight (+13%) were significantly increased by the biostimulant application compared to the control, regardless of the dose. The lowest dose resulted in the best effect on the ground plant dry weight (+38%) and, in order to the root system, on total length (+55%), average diameter (+36%), volume (+66%), tips (+49%), crossings (+88%), forks (+68%), projected (+62%), and total surface area (+28%). Compared to the control, plants treated with the biostimulant significantly enhanced leaf (+16%) and root (+8%) nitrogen content, photosynthetic rate (+52%), transpiration rate (+55%), and stomatal conductance (+81%), although there were no changes in dark-adapted chlorophyll fluorescence. Differences in the application method were not evident in the aboveground morphological traits, except in the plant shoot number (root drenching: +10%). The foliar spray compared to root drenching had a significant effect only on flower dry weight (3.8 vs. 3.0 g plant−1). On the other hand, root drenching had a positive effect on ground dry weight (2.7 vs. 2.3 g plant−1), root morphology, leaf-N and root-N content (+3%), transpiration rate (+21%), stomatal conductance (+40%), concentration of CO2 in intracellular spaces (+11%), as well as on the efficiency of Photosystem II (+11%). A higher pot quality was obtained in “Red sonnet” compared to “Yellow floral shower.” Based on our findings, applying the biostimulant to potted snapdragon at the lowest dose, as part of a fertilizing regime, improves the crop quality in an agro-environmental sustainable way.

1 January 2017 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SJStanislav Juráň
Stanislav Juráň
EPEmanuele Pallozzi
Emanuele Pallozzi
GGGabriele Guidolotti
Gabriele Guidolotti
Silvano FaresSilvano Fares
Silvano Fares
Ladislav ŠigutLadislav Šigut
Ladislav Šigut
OUOtmar Urban
Otmar Urban

1 March 2018 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EPEmanuele Pallozzi
Emanuele Pallozzi
ILIlaria Lusini
Ilaria Lusini
LCLucia Cherubini
Lucia Cherubini
RHRamilla A. Hajiaghayeva
Ramilla A. Hajiaghayeva
PCPaolo Ciccioli
Paolo Ciccioli
CCCarlo Calfapietra
Carlo Calfapietra