Green wall irrigation procedures are a particularly important and hard task, given that the quality of the green wall depends on them. There is currently a wide variety of irrigation programmers available, with a range of functions and prices, thereby replacing manual activities and making it easier to maintain green walls. This paper proposes the use of low-cost automated irrigation programmers via a freeware called Arduino. The system is based on air and substrate measurements to ensure optimal plant growth and high water-use efficiency. At certain thresholds, the irrigation system is activated. This not only makes irrigation more convenient but also helps to reduce energy consumption, increases irrigation efficiency and saves time. The data is then sent via Transmission Control Protocol using Internet of Things technology, in this case ThingSpeak. The platform compiles the data and presents them in simple graphical format, thus enabling real-time monitoring from wherever there is Internet access. Together with Arduino, the project incorporates the Raspberry pi system that operates like a database via Hypertext Transfer Protocol Wi-Fi received by a Structured Query Language (MySQL) server using Hypertext Preprocessor. These data are used for the subsequent analysis of green wall performance.

Este trabajo muestra como la fibra de coco mezclada con cascarilla de arroz es útil como medio de cultivo en muros verdes, reduciendo el impacto ambiental de la explotación de musgo Sphagnum a largo plazo. Por esto, se diseñó un prototipo de muros verdes para analizar la diferencia entre ambos sustratos. La escorrentía y la retención hídrica de los sustratos se analizaron mediante sensores de flujo y humedad. El sustrato compuesto de cascarilla de arroz y fibra de coco mostró mayor homogeneidad en la distribución del agua de riego que el musgo Sphagnum. Los análisis de clorofila mostraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre el material vegetal plantado en el sustrato de fibra de coco y cascarilla de arroz y en el de Sphagnum, pero no se encontraron diferencias en biomasa y en el contenido hídrico.