Blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a natural protective membrane that prevents central nervous system (CNS) from toxins and pathogens in blood. However, the presence of BBB complicates the pharmacotherapy for CNS disorders as the most chemical drugs and biopharmaceuticals have been impeded to enter the brain. Insufficient drug delivery into the brain leads to low therapeutic efficacy as well as aggravated side effects due to the accumulation in other organs and tissues. Recent breakthrough in materials science and nanotechnology provides a library of advanced materials with customized structure and property serving as a powerful toolkit for targeted drug delivery. In-depth research in the field of anatomical and pathological study on brain and BBB further facilitates the development of brain-targeted strategies for enhanced BBB crossing. In this review, the physiological structure and different cells contributing to this barrier are summarized. Various emerging strategies for permeability regulation and BBB crossing including passive transcytosis, intranasal administration, ligands conjugation, membrane coating, stimuli-triggered BBB disruption, and other strategies to overcome BBB obstacle are highlighted. Versatile drug delivery systems ranging from organic, inorganic, and biologics-derived materials with their synthesis procedures and unique physio-chemical properties are summarized and analyzed. This review aims to provide an up-to-date and comprehensive guideline for researchers in diverse fields, offering perspectives on further development of brain-targeted drug delivery system.

Phenolics are readily accessible molecules with versatile reactivity and good biocompatibility—they have catalyzed research into phenolic-enabled nanotechnology thus providing a powerful toolkit for on-demand particle engineering in biomedicine.

Electroresponsive and synergistic brain-targeting nanoparticles improve efficacy of pharmacotherapy for epilepsy.

Ischemic stroke is lethal cerebrovascular disease, and reperfusion as the main strategy of blood supply restoration can cause severe ischemic brain damage. Considered as the major obstacle in medication for stroke, neuroinflammation after reperfusion undergoes dynamic progression, making precision treatment for stroke a Herculean task. In this work, we report a pathogenesis-adaptive polydopamine nanosystem for sequential therapy of ischemic stroke. Intrinsic free radical scavenging and tailored mesostructure of the nanosystem can attenuate oxidative stress at the initial stage. Upon microglial overactivation at the later stage, minocycline-loaded nanosystem can timely reverse the pro-inflammatory transition in response to activated matrix metalloproteinase-2, providing on-demand regulation. Further in vivo stroke study demonstrates a higher survival rate and improved brain recovery of the sequential strategy, compared with mono-therapy and combined therapy. Complemented with satisfactory biosafety results, this adaptive nanosystem for sequential and on-demand regulation of post-stroke neuroinflammation is a promising approach to ischemic stroke therapy.

Nanomaterials have aroused great interests in drug delivery due to their nanoscale structure, facile modifiability, and multifunctional physicochemical properties. Currently, stimuli‐responsive nanomaterials that can respond to endogenous or exogenous stimulus display strong potentials in biomedical applications. In comparison with conventional nanomaterials, stimuli‐responsive nanomaterials can improve therapeutic efficiency and reduce the toxicity of drugs toward normal tissues through specific targeting and on‐demand drug release at pathological sites. In this review, we summarize the responsive mechanism of a variety of stimulus, including pH, redox, and enzymes within pathological microenvironment, as well as exogenous stimulus such as thermal effect, magnetic field, light, and ultrasound. After that, biomedical applications (e.g., drug delivery, imaging, and theranostics) of stimuli‐responsive nanomaterials in a diverse array of common diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, cancer, neurological disorders, inflammation, and bacterial infection, are presented and discussed. Finally, the remaining challenges and outlooks of future research directions for the biomedical applications of stimuli‐responsive nanomaterials are also discussed. We hope that this review can provide valuable guidance for developing stimuli‐responsive nanomaterials and accelerate their biomedical applications in diseases diagnosis and treatment.