Troy Q Tabarestani

Dr. Troy Q Tabarestani

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 April 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PDPeter N. Drossopoulos
Peter N. Drossopoulos
FOFavour Ononogbu-Uche
Favour Ononogbu-Uche
TTTroy Q Tabarestani
Troy Q Tabarestani
CHChuan-Ching Huang
Chuan-Ching Huang
MPMounica Paturu
Mounica Paturu
MAMuhammad M Abd-El-Barr
Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
The transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has seen significant evolution since its early inception, reflecting advancements in surgical techniques, patient safety, and outcomes. Originally described as an improvement over the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), the TLIF began as an open surgical procedure, that notably reduced the need for the extensive neural retractation that hindered the PLIF. In line with the broader practice of surgery, trending toward minimally invasive access, the TLIF was followed by the development of the minimally invasive TLIF (MIS-TLIF), a technique that further decreased tissue trauma and postoperative complications. Subsequent advancements, including Trans-Kambin’s Triangle TLIF (percLIF) and transfacet LIF, have continued to refine surgical access, minimize surgical footprint, and reduce the risk of injury to the patient. The latest evolution, as we will describe it, the patient-specific TLIF, is a culmination of the aforementioned adaptations and incorporates advanced imaging and segmentation technologies into perioperative planning, allowing surgeons to tailor approaches based on individual patient anatomy and pathology. These developments signify a shift towards more precise methods in spine surgery. The ongoing evolution of the TLIF technique illustrates the dynamic nature of surgery and emphasizes the need for continued adaptation and refinement.

30 September 2022 in Neurospine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NLNicholle E. Lewis
Nicholle E. Lewis
TTTroy Q Tabarestani
Troy Q Tabarestani
BCBrianna R. Cellini
Brianna R. Cellini
NZNina Zhang
Nina Zhang
EMEric J. Marrotte
Eric J. Marrotte
TFTimothy D. Faw
Timothy D. Faw
Physical rehabilitation is essential for enhancing recovery in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI); however, aside from early surgical intervention and hemodynamic management, there are no proven interventions for promoting recovery in the acute phase. In general, early rehabilitation is considered beneficial, but optimal parameters and potential contraindications for implementing rehabilitation at very early time points are unclear. Moreover, clinical trials to date are limited to studies initiating rehabilitation 2 weeks after injury and later. To address these gaps, this article reviews the preclinical literature on physical interventions initiated within the first 8 days postinjury. Effects of early rehabilitation on molecular and structural nervous system changes, behavioral function, and body systems are considered. Most studies utilized treadmill or cycle training as the primary intervention. Treadmill training initiated within the first 3 days and terminated by 1 week after injury worsened autonomic function, inflammation, and locomotor outcomes, while swim training during this period increased microvascular dysfunction. In contrast, lower-intensity rehabilitation such as reach training, ladder training, or voluntary wheel or ball training showed benefits when implemented during the first 3 days. Rehabilitation initiated at 4 days postinjury was also associated with enhanced motor recovery. Cycling appears to have the greatest risk-benefit ratio; however, the effects of cycle training in the first 3 days were not investigated. Overall, research suggests that lower intensity or voluntary rehabilitation during the hyperacute phase is more appropriate until at least 4 days postinjury, at which point higher-intensity activity becomes safer and more beneficial for recovery.

1 June 2023 in JAAOS: Global Research and Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMikhail Alexander Bethell
Mikhail Alexander Bethell
Albert T AnastasioAlbert T Anastasio
Albert T Anastasio
JTJoshua R. Taylor
Joshua R. Taylor
TTTroy Q Tabarestani
Troy Q Tabarestani
CKChristopher S. Klifto
Christopher S. Klifto
OAOke Anakwenze
Oke Anakwenze
Background: Because of the lack of scientific oversight, the quality, applicability, and consistency of healthcare-related TikTok videos have become a focus of research exploration. The orthopaedic surgery literature lags behind other medical fields in analyzing the widespread utilization of TikTok videos for medical information delivery. Methods: TikTok was queried using the hashtag #shoulderstabilityexercises, and 109 videos were included. The videos were collected by two authors and independently evaluated using DISCERN (a well-validated informational analysis tool) and shoulder stability exercise education score (a self-designed tool for the evaluation of shoulder instability–related exercises). Results: DISCERN scores of videos uploaded by general users had significantly lower scores in all four categories than those uploaded by healthcare professionals (P < 0.001, P = 0.005, P = 0.002, and P < 0.001). For the shoulder stability exercise education score, general users had a significantly lower score than the healthcare professionals at 3.36 and 4.91 on a 25-point scale, respectively (P = 0.034). General users had more videos graded as very poor (84.2%) in comparison to the number of videos uploaded by healthcare professionals deemed very poor (51.5%). However, the remainder of healthcare professionals had their videos graded as poor (48.5%). Conclusion: Despite slightly improved video quality from healthcare professionals, the overall educational of the videos related to shoulder instability exercises was poor.

8 May 2023 in World Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDavid B. Sykes
David B. Sykes
TTTroy Q Tabarestani
Troy Q Tabarestani
NCNauman S. Chaudhry
Nauman S. Chaudhry
DSDavid S. Salven
David S. Salven
CSChristopher I. Shaffrey
Christopher I. Shaffrey
MAMuhammad M. Abd-El-Barr
Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr

20 April 2024 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PDPeter N. Drossopoulos
Peter N. Drossopoulos
ASArnav Sharma
Arnav Sharma
FOFavour Ononogbu-Uche
Favour Ononogbu-Uche
TTTroy Q Tabarestani
Troy Q Tabarestani
ABAlyssa Bartlett
Alyssa Bartlett
MAMuhammad M Abd-El-Barr
Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
The introduction of minimally invasive surgery ushered in a new era of spine surgery by minimizing the undue iatrogenic injury, recovery time, and blood loss, among other complications, of traditional open procedures. Over time, technological advancements have further refined the care of the operative minimally invasive spine patient. Moreover, pre-, and postoperative care have also undergone significant change by way of artificial intelligence risk stratification, advanced imaging for surgical planning and patient selection, postoperative recovery pathways, and digital health solutions. Despite these advancements, challenges persist necessitating ongoing research and collaboration to further optimize patient care in minimally invasive spine surgery.

30 September 2022 in Neurospine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TTTroy Q Tabarestani
Troy Q Tabarestani
NLNicholle E. Lewis
Nicholle E. Lewis
MKMargot Kelly-Hedrick
Margot Kelly-Hedrick
NZNina Zhang
Nina Zhang
BCBrianna R. Cellini
Brianna R. Cellini
MAMuhammad M Abd-El-Barr
Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
Acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) can be a devastating and costly event for individuals, their families, and the health system as a whole. Prognosis is heavily dependent on the physical extent of the injury and the severity of neurological dysfunction. If not treated urgently, individuals can suffer exacerbated secondary injury cascades that may increase tissue injury and limit recovery. Initial recognition and rapid treatment of acute SCI are vital to limiting secondary injury, reducing morbidity, and providing the best chance of functional recovery. This article aims to review the pathophysiology of SCI and the most up-to-date management of the acute traumatic SCI, specifically examining the modern approaches to surgical treatments along with the ethical limitations of research in this field.