Objective The mechanical thrombectomy (MT) benefit is related to the degree of reperfusion achieved. First pass effect (FPE) is defined as complete/near revascularisation of the large-vessel occlusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2c-3) after a single device pass. This study assessed the health benefit and economic impact of achieving FPE for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients from the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective. Design A lifetime Markov model was used to estimate incremental costs and health outcomes (measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)) of patients that achieve FPE. A subanalysis of the Systematic Evaluation of Patients Treated With Neurothrombectomy Devices for Acute Ischaemic Stroke (STRATIS) registry was performed to obtain clinical outcomes. The base case included all patients that achieved at least a final mTICI ≥2 b, while the alternative scenario included all patients regardless of their final mTICI (0–3). Treatment costs were updated to reflect current practice based on expert panel consensus, while other acute and long-term costs were obtained from a previous cost-effectiveness analysis of MT performed in Spain. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the model’s robustness. Setting Spanish healthcare perspective. Participants AIS patients in Spain. Interventions FPE following MT. Outcome measures The model estimated QALYs, lifetime costs and net monetary benefit for the FPE and non-FPE group, depending on the inclusion of reperfusion groups and formal care costs. Results STRATIS subanalysis estimated significantly better clinical outcomes at 90 days for the FPE group in all scenarios. In the base case, the model estimated lifetime cost saving per patient of €16 583 and an incremental QALY gain of 1.2 years of perfect health for the FPE group. Cost savings and QALY gains were greater in the alternative scenario (-€44 289; 1.75). In all scenarios, cost savings were driven by the long-term cost reduction. Conclusion Achieving FPE after MT can lead to better health outcomes per AIS patient and important cost savings for the Spanish NHS.

Background: The Advanced Neurovascular Access (ANA) thrombectomy system is a novel stroke thrombectomy device comprising a self-expanding funnel designed to reduce clot fragmentation by locally restricting flow while becoming as wide as the lodging artery. Once deployed, the ANA device allows distal aspiration combined with a stent retriever to mobilize the clot into the funnel where it remains copped during extraction. We investigated the safety and efficacy of ANA catheter system. Methods: SOLONDA (Solitaire in Combination With the ANA Catheter System as Manufactured by Anaconda) was a prospective, open, single-arm, multicenter trial with blinded assessment of the primary outcome by an independent core lab. Patients with anterior circulation vessel occlusion admitted within 8 hours from symptom onset were eligible. The primary end point was successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b–3) with ≤3 passes of the ANA device in combination with stent retriever, before the use of rescue therapy in the intention to treat population. Primary predefined analysis was noninferiority as compared to the performance end point observed in HERMES (High Effective Reperfusion Using Multiple Endovascular Devices). Results: After enrollment of 74 patients, an interim analysis was conducted, and the trial Steering Committee decided to terminate recruitment due to safety and performance objectives were reached. Mean age was 71.6 (SD 8.9) years, 46.6% women and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale on admission 14 (interquartile range, 10–19). Successful reperfusion within 3 passes before rescue therapy was achieved in 60/72 (83.3% [95% CI, 74.7%–91.9%]) with a rate of complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2c–3) of 60% (95% CI, 48.4%–71.1%; 43/72 patients). After noninferiority was confirmed ( P <0.01), the ANA device also showed superiority in the rate of successful reperfusion with ≤3 passes ( P =0.02). First-pass successful recanalization rate was 55.6% (95% CI, 44.1%–67.0%), with a first-pass complete recanalization rate of 38.9% (95% CI, 27.6%–50.1%). Rescue therapy to obtain a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score 2b–3 was needed in 12/72 (17%) patients. At 90 days, the rate of favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) was 57.5% (95% CI, 46.2%–68.9%), and the rate of excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–1) was 45.2% (95% CI, 33.8%–56.6%). The rate of severe adverse device related was 1.4%. Conclusions: In this clinical experience, the ANA device achieved a high rate of complete recanalization with a preliminary good safety profile and favorable 90 days clinical outcomes. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04095767.

Introduction: Although stentrievers (SRs) have been a mainstay of mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and current guidelines recommend the use of SRs in the treatment of large vessel occlusion stroke (LVO), there is a paucity of studies in the literature comparing SRs directly against each other in terms of mechanical and functional properties. Timely access to endovascular therapy and the ability to restore intracranial flow in a safe, efficient, and efficacious manner have been critical to the success of MT. This study aimed to investigate the impact of contemporary SR characteristics, including model, brand, size, and length, on the first-pass effect (FPE) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Consecutive patients with M1 occlusion treated with a single SR+BGC were recruited from the ROSSETTI registry. The primary outcome was the FPE that was defined as modified (mFPE) or true (tFPE) for the achievement of modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) grades 2b-3 or 3 after a single device pass, respectively. We compared patients who achieved mFPE with those who achieved tFPE according to SR characteristics. Results: We included 610 patients (52.3% female and 47.7% male, mean age 75.1 ± 13.62 years). mFPE was achieved in 357 patients (58.5%), whereas tFPE was achieved in 264 (43.3%). There was no significant association between SR characteristics and mFPE or tFPE. Specifically, the SR size did not show a statistically significant relationship with improvement in FPE. Similarly, the length of the SR did not yield significant differences in the mFPE and tFPE, even when the data were grouped. Conclusions: Our data indicate that contemporary SR-mediated thrombectomy characteristics, including model, brand, size, and length, do not significantly affect the FPE.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several nonrandomized studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of balloon guide catheters in treating patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion. However, their impact on the elderly populations has been underreported. We aimed to analyze the effect of balloon guide catheters in a cohort of elderly patients (80 years of age or older) with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients from June 2019 to June 2022 were collected from the ROSSETTI Registry. Demographic and clinical data, angiographic endovascular technique, and clinical outcome were compared between balloon guide catheter and non-balloon guide catheter groups. We studied the association between balloon guide catheters and the rate of complete recanalization after a single first-pass effect modified TICI 2c–3, as well as their association with functional independence at 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 808 patients were included during this period, 465 (57.5%) of whom were treated with balloon guide catheters. Patients treated with balloon guide catheters were older, had more neurologic severity at admission and lower baseline ASPECTS, and were less likely to receive IV fibrinolytics. No differences were observed in terms of the modified first-pass effect between groups (45.8 versus 39.9%, P = .096). In the multivariable regression analysis, balloon guide catheter use was not independently associated with a modified first-pass effect or the final modified TICI 2c–3, or with functional independence at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, balloon guide catheter use during endovascular treatment of anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion in elderly patients did not predict the first-pass effect, near-complete final recanalization, or functional independence at 3 months. Further studies, including randomized clinical trials, are needed to confirm these results.

Background: Balloon guide catheters (BGCs) are adjunctive devices that may be used during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to induce flow arrest and improve clot retrieval and reperfusion outcomes for acute ischemic stroke. As the cost-effectiveness of BGC use remains uncertain, this study assessed short- and long-term direct healthcare costs associated with BGC use versus standard guide catheters (SGC) during MT. Methods: A decision tree model estimated the short-term costs (index hospitalization), long-term costs (one year after index hospitalization), and total costs for patients undergoing MT + BGC versus MT + SGC from a healthcare system perspective in the United States (US), Canada, United Kingdom (UK), Sweden, Germany, Italy, Spain, Belgium, and The Netherlands. Average device costs were sourced from public tender prices and market research data. Weighted average healthcare costs for modified Rankin Scale scores were sourced from published literature for the respective countries. A 2024 meta-analysis supporting improved outcomes with BGC provided input parameters to model treatment effects for BGC and SGC. Deterministic one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of model parameters and accounted for uncertainty. Results: Across all countries, long-term and total per-patient costs were lower with MT + BGC, yielding total per-patient cost savings of $6297 (US), CAD 3006 (Canada), £1828 (UK), 28,950 kr (Sweden), €1077 (Germany), €709 (Italy), €3678 (Spain), €2259 (Belgium), and €3344 (The Netherlands). The probability of MT + BGC yielding cost savings ranged 0.356–0.911 (short term), 0.962–0.975 (long term), and 0.838–0.935 (total costs). While long-term and total costs consistently favored MT + BGC, short-term cost savings showed more variability across countries. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that BGC use is associated with total one-year per-patient cost savings for inpatient and postdischarge stroke care across the US, Canada, and seven European healthcare systems. Balloon guide catheters can potentially reduce post-stroke care costs and should be considered more broadly, despite the additional cost incurred by the device.