Giuseppe Giannino

Dr. Giuseppe Giannino

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 February 2024 in Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GGGiuseppe Giannino
Giuseppe Giannino
VBValentina Braia
Valentina Braia
CBCarola Griffith Brookles
Carola Griffith Brookles
FGFederico Giacobbe
Federico Giacobbe
Fabrizio D'AscenzoFabrizio D'Ascenzo
Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
VDVeronica Dusi
Veronica Dusi
The cardiac autonomic nervous system (CANS) plays a pivotal role in cardiac homeostasis as well as in cardiac pathology. The first level of cardiac autonomic control, the intrinsic cardiac nervous system (ICNS), is located within the epicardial fat pads and is physically organized in ganglionated plexi (GPs). The ICNS system does not only contain parasympathetic cardiac efferent neurons, as long believed, but also afferent neurons and local circuit neurons. Thanks to its high degree of connectivity, combined with neuronal plasticity and memory capacity, the ICNS allows for a beat-to-beat control of all cardiac functions and responses as well as integration with extracardiac and higher centers for longer-term cardiovascular reflexes. The present review provides a detailed overview of the current knowledge of the bidirectional connection between the ICNS and the most studied cardiac pathologies/conditions (myocardial infarction, heart failure, arrhythmias and heart transplant) and the potential therapeutic implications. Indeed, GP modulation with efferent activity inhibition, differently achieved, has been studied for atrial fibrillation and functional bradyarrhythmias, while GP modulation with efferent activity stimulation has been evaluated for myocardial infarction, heart failure and ventricular arrhythmias. Electrical therapy has the unique potential to allow for both kinds of ICNS modulation while preserving the anatomical integrity of the system.

1 August 2023 in Journal of the American Heart Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FBFrancesco Bruno
Francesco Bruno
GMGiorgio Marengo
Giorgio Marengo
OFOvidio De Filippo
Ovidio De Filippo
WWWojciech Wańha
Wojciech Wańha
SLSergio Leonardi
Sergio Leonardi
COCollaborators
Collaborators
Background: The impact of complete revascularization (CR) on the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remains to be elucidated. Methods and Results: Consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome with multivessel coronary artery disease from the CORALYS (Incidence and Predictors of Heart Failure After Acute Coronary Syndrome) registry were included. Incidence of first hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death was the primary end point. Patients were stratified according to completeness of coronary revascularization. Of 14 699 patients in the CORALYS registry, 5054 presented with multivessel disease. One thousand four hundred seventy‐three (29.2%) underwent CR, while 3581 (70.8%) did not. Over 5 years follow‐up, CR was associated with a reduced incidence of the primary end point (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.51–0.85]), first HF hospitalization (adjusted HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.49–0.90]) along with all‐cause death and cardiovascular death alone (adjusted HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56–0.97] and HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.38–0.84], respectively). The results were consistent in the propensity‐score matching population and in inverse probability treatment weighting analysis. The benefit of CR was consistent across acute coronary syndrome presentations (HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.39–0.89] for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction and HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.50–0.99] for non‐ST‐elevation acute coronary syndrome) and in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >40% (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.37–0.72]), while no benefit was observed in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.37–1.10], P for interaction 0.04). Conclusions: CR after acute coronary syndrome reduced the risk of first hospitalization for HF and cardiovascular death, as well as first HF hospitalization, and cardiovascular and overall death both in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction and non‐ST‐elevation acute coronary syndrome. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT 04895176.

26 February 2026 in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FGFederico Giacobbe
Federico Giacobbe
PMPierre Meynet
Pierre Meynet
MBMarco Balducci
Marco Balducci
SCSergio Capoccia
Sergio Capoccia
RCRino Andrea Cimino
Rino Andrea Cimino
GFGaetano Maria De Ferrari
Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a key driver of ischemia and prognosis across several non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. This review summarizes the main tools for diagnosing microvascular dysfunction and available evidence on CMD incidence and the prognostic role in patients with cardiomyopathies. In dilated cardiomyopathy, CMD is associated with reduced myocardial blood flow, greater fibrosis, adverse remodeling, and worse outcomes. In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, CMD is highly prevalent and multifactorial (arteriolar remodeling, reduced capillary density, extravascular compression, diastolic dysfunction, and/or left ventricular (LV) outflow obstruction), correlating with fibrosis, heart failure, and arrhythmias/sudden death. In Takotsubo syndrome, CMD appears acute and reversible, with microvascular spasms as a predominant mechanism and plausible pathophysiologic basis of the event. In arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, preliminary data show a blunted hyperemic response and autonomic abnormalities that may impair microvascular vasodilation. In infiltrative and storage diseases (amyloidosis and Anderson–Fabry disease), CMD is often early, preceding hypertrophy/fibrosis, and contributes to symptoms, contractile dysfunction, and adverse outcomes; in sarcoidosis, microvascular inflammation reduces coronary flow reserve (CFR) and is associated with events. Targeted therapies remain limited; optimization of risk factors and drugs that modulate endothelial/metabolic function (statins, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, vasodilating β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors) yielded variable signals; device-based and nonpharmacologic strategies are under investigation. In conclusion, integrating microcirculatory assessment improves risk stratification and may furnish future therapeutic targets across cardiomyopathies.

11 May 2026 in Cardiogenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FAFilippo Angelini
Filippo Angelini
VDVeronica Dusi
Veronica Dusi
AFAmedeo Maria Feneziani
Amedeo Maria Feneziani
RMRossella Manai
Rossella Manai
MBMatteo Bianco
Matteo Bianco
CRClaudia Raineri
Claudia Raineri
Background: Genetic testing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) yields variable positivity rates. Identifying clinical predictors of positive genetic tests could improve pre-test counseling and refine expectations about diagnostic yield. Methods: We analyzed consecutive genotyped HCM probands from a contemporary multicenter cohort across four Italian tertiary centers. Genotype positivity was defined as the presence of ≥1 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant (ACMG classes 4–5). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of genotype positivity. Sensitivity analyses assessed the incremental value of left atrial volume index (LAVI) ≥ 34 mL/m2 and the mode of first clinical presentation. Results: Among 274 genotyped probands (median age at diagnosis 54 years; 62% male), 86 (31%) were genotype-positive (38% MYBPC3, 29% MYH7). Age at diagnosis 20 mm and gender were not predictive of genotype positivity. Inclusion of LAVI modestly improved the model performance (AUC 0.769, p = 0.016, ΔAUC +0.024; DeLong p = 0.016) but without leading to meaningful patient reclassification. Conclusions: Genotype positivity in HCM links to earlier onset and family history; traditional severity markers and initial presentation may not independently suggest genetic causality. These findings may help shape a personalized approach to genetic counseling in HCM.