Stijn R. J. M. Deckers

Dr. Stijn R. J. M. Deckers


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Christopher Stephen NorrieChristopher Stephen Norrie
Christopher Stephen Norrie
SDStijn R. J. M. Deckers
Stijn R. J. M. Deckers
MRMaartje Radstaake
Maartje Radstaake
HBHans van Balkom
Hans van Balkom
This paper presents a narrative review of the current practices in assessing learners’ cognitive abilities and the limitations of traditional intelligence tests in capturing a comprehensive understanding of a child’s learning potential. Referencing prior research, it explores the concept of dynamic assessment (DA) as a promising yet underutilised alternative that focuses on a child’s responsiveness to learning opportunities. The paper highlights the potential of novel technologies, in particular tangible user interfaces (TUIs), in integrating computational science with DA to improve the access and accuracy of assessment results, especially for children with communication support needs (CSN), as a catalyst for abetting critical communicative competencies. However, existing research in this area has mainly focused on the automated mediation of DA, neglecting the human element that is crucial for effective solutions in special education. A framework is proposed to address these issues, combining pedagogical and sociocultural elements alongside adaptive information technology solutions in an assessment system informed by user-centred design principles to fully support teachers/facilitators and learners with CSN within the special education ecosystem.

18 March 2024 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDStijn R. J. M. Deckers
Stijn R. J. M. Deckers
YZYvonne van Zaalen
Yvonne van Zaalen
Background: Shared decision-making is one key element of interprofessional collaboration. Communication is often considered to be the main reason for inefficient or ineffective collaboration. Little is known about group dynamics in the process of shared decision-making in a team with professionals, including the patient or their parent. This study aimed to evaluate just that. Methods: Simulation-based training was provided for groups of medical and allied health profession students from universities across the globe. In an overt ethnographic research design, passive observations were made to ensure careful observations and accurate reporting. The training offered the context to directly experience the behaviors and interactions of a group of people. Results: Overall, 39 different goals were defined in different orders of prioritizing and with different time frames or intervention ideas. Shared decision-making was lacking, and groups chose to convince the parents when a conflict arose. Group dynamics made parents verbally agree with professionals, although their non-verbal communication was not in congruence with that. Conclusions: The outcome and goalsetting of an interprofessional meeting are highly influenced by group dynamics. The vision, structure, process, and results of the meeting are affected by multiple inter- or intrapersonal factors.

21 August 2024 in Augmentative and Alternative Communication
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMascha Legel
Mascha Legel
GSGloria Soto
Gloria Soto
NGNicola Grove
Nicola Grove
AWAnnalu Walller
Annalu Walller
SDStijn R. J. M. Deckers
Stijn R. J. M. Deckers
BSBert Steenbergen
Bert Steenbergen
Sharing personal stories with others is essential to human interaction and language development. To communicate, individuals use a variety of semiotic resources, including images, symbols, and written and spoken language. These modes are deployed in the co-construction of a daily face-to-face conversation. A self-created film can serve as a valuable resource to facilitate a deeper understanding of a personal experience, especially where spoken or written language may present a challenge, for example, for people who rely on augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Although the AAC literature indicates that using videos delivers benefits for aided communicators, guidelines on how to self-create, use, and transcribe them are rare. The present paper, a tutorial, describes how people who use AAC can develop a personal-video-scene (PVS) via the Film as Observable Communication (FaOC) method to utilize self-created films in sharing their stories. The first part of this paper, the theoretical framework, describes theories, methods, and practices from the fields of AAC, social semiotics, and visual anthropology, on which the FaOC method is based. The second part provides a step-by-step tutorial delivering practical guidance on how to create, use, and transcribe the PVS as a resource in conversations.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MLMascha Legel
Mascha Legel
SDStijn R. J. M. Deckers
Stijn R. J. M. Deckers
GSGloria Soto
Gloria Soto
NGNicola Grove
Nicola Grove
AWAnnalu Walller
Annalu Walller
BSBert Steenbergen
Bert Steenbergen
When access to natural speech is limited or challenging, as is the case for people with complex communication needs, self-created digital film can be practical to use as one of the resources within a multimodal conversation about a personal experience. The detailed and contextual information such audiovisual media offers with today’s available technology may assist the utility of other communication modes, such as (computerized) spoken, written or signed language, to foster mutual understanding and story growth. To promote the use of self-created film, here named a personal-video-scene (PVS), in the practice of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), a greater understanding is required of how such media can operate as a resource within social interactions, such as daily conversations. This study therefore introduces a multimodal coding model developed to study the employment of a PVS within a film-elicited conversational narrative, relating to four aspects of conversational control: (a) topic development, (b) conversational structure, (c) conversational repair and (d) conversational maintenance. A case study illustrates how the use of a PVS in story-sharing was instrumental in establishing common ground between narrators, boosting the frequency of comments and questions, mitigating instances of conversational repair and expanding topic development.

15 February 2018 in Neuropraxis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SDStijn R. J. M. Deckers
Stijn R. J. M. Deckers
YZYvonne van Zaalen
Yvonne van Zaalen

1 December 2025 in Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWCatriona Windsor
Catriona Windsor
KNKari-Anne Næss
Kari-Anne Næss
MKMelanie Kirmess
Melanie Kirmess
SDStijn R. J. M. Deckers
Stijn R. J. M. Deckers
NBNatalie Ballentine
Natalie Ballentine
Renée SpeyerRenée Speyer
Renée Speyer