Enrico Lunghi

Dr. Enrico Lunghi

Institute of Zoology Chinese Academy of Sciences
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 December 2023 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMattia Saccò
Mattia Saccò
SMStefano Mammola
Stefano Mammola
FAFlorian Altermatt
Florian Altermatt
RARoman Alther
Roman Alther
ROSSANO BOLPAGNIROSSANO BOLPAGNI
ROSSANO BOLPAGNI
RRRobert Reinecke
Robert Reinecke
Groundwater is a vital ecosystem of the global water cycle, hosting unique biodiversity and providing essential services to societies. Despite being the largest unfrozen freshwater resource, in a period of depletion by extraction and pollution, groundwater environments have been repeatedly overlooked in global biodiversity conservation agendas. Disregarding the importance of groundwater as an ecosystem ignores its critical role in preserving surface biomes. To foster timely global conservation of groundwater, we propose elevating the concept of keystone species into the realm of ecosystems, claiming groundwater as a keystone ecosystem that influences the integrity of many dependent ecosystems. Our global analysis shows that over half of land surface areas (52.6%) has a medium‐to‐high interaction with groundwater, reaching up to 74.9% when deserts and high mountains are excluded. We postulate that the intrinsic transboundary features of groundwater are critical for shifting perspectives towards more holistic approaches in aquatic ecology and beyond. Furthermore, we propose eight key themes to develop a science‐policy integrated groundwater conservation agenda. Given ecosystems above and below the ground intersect at many levels, considering groundwater as an essential component of planetary health is pivotal to reduce biodiversity loss and buffer against climate change.

1 November 2021 in Biological Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAmanda E. Bates
Amanda E. Bates
RPRichard B. Primack
Richard B. Primack
BBBrandy S. Biggar
Brandy S. Biggar
TBTomas J. Bird
Tomas J. Bird
MCMary E. Clinton
Mary E. Clinton
CDCarlos M. Duarte
Carlos M. Duarte

1 May 2021 in Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMStefano Mammola
Stefano Mammola
Enrico LunghiEnrico Lunghi
Enrico Lunghi
HBHelena Bilandžija
Helena Bilandžija
PCPedro Cardoso
Pedro Cardoso
VGVolker Grimm
Volker Grimm
Alejandro MartínezAlejandro Martínez
Alejandro Martínez
Caves and other subterranean habitats fulfill the requirements of experimental model systems to address general questions in ecology and evolution. Yet, the harsh working conditions of these environments and the uniqueness of the subterranean organisms have challenged most attempts to pursuit standardized research. Two main obstacles have synergistically hampered previous attempts. First, there is ahabitat impedimentrelated to the objective difficulties of exploring subterranean habitats and our inability to access the network of fissures that represents the elective habitat for the so‐called “cave species.” Second, there is abiological impedimentillustrated by the rarity of most subterranean species and their low physiological tolerance, often limiting sample size and complicating laboratory experiments. We explore the advantages and disadvantages of four general experimental setups (in situ,quasi in situ,ex situ, andin silico) in the light of habitat and biological impediments. We also discuss the potential of indirect approaches to research. Furthermore, using bibliometric data, we provide a quantitative overview of the model organisms that scientists have exploited in the study of subterranean life. Our over‐arching goal is to promote caves as model systems where one can perform standardized scientific research. This is important not only to achieve an in‐depth understanding of the functioning of subterranean ecosystems but also to fully exploit their long‐discussed potential in addressing general scientific questions with implications beyond the boundaries of this discipline.

1 February 2014 in Acta Oecologica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Enrico LunghiEnrico Lunghi
Enrico Lunghi
Raoul ManentiRaoul Manenti
Raoul Manenti
Gentile Francesco FicetolaGentile Francesco Ficetola
Gentile Francesco Ficetola

9 July 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gentile Francesco FicetolaGentile Francesco Ficetola
Gentile Francesco Ficetola
BBBenedetta Barzaghi
Benedetta Barzaghi
AMAndrea Melotto
Andrea Melotto
MMMartina Muraro
Martina Muraro
Enrico LunghiEnrico Lunghi
Enrico Lunghi
Raoul ManentiRaoul Manenti
Raoul Manenti
Accurate measures of species abundance are essential to identify conservation strategies. N-mixture models are increasingly used to estimate abundance on the basis of species counts. In this study we tested whether abundance estimates obtained using N-mixture models provide consistent results with more traditional approaches requiring capture (capture-mark recapture and removal sampling). We focused on endemic, threatened species of amphibians and reptiles in Italy, for which accurate abundance data are needed for conservation assessments: the Lanza’s Alpine salamander Salamandra lanzai, the Ambrosi’s cave salamander Hydromantes ambrosii and the Aeolian wall lizard Podarcis raffonei. In visual counts, detection probability was variable among species, ranging between 0.14 (Alpine salamanders) and 0.60 (cave salamanders). For all the species, abundance estimates obtained using N-mixture models showed limited differences with the ones obtained through capture-mark-recapture or removal sampling. The match was particularly accurate for cave salamanders in sites with limited abundance and for lizards, nevertheless non-incorporating heterogeneity of detection probability increased bias. N-mixture models provide reliable abundance estimates that are comparable with the ones of more traditional approaches, and offer additional advantages such as a smaller sampling effort and no need of manipulating individuals, which in turn reduces the risk of harming animals and spreading diseases.

13 August 2015 in PeerJ
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Enrico LunghiEnrico Lunghi
Enrico Lunghi
Raoul ManentiRaoul Manenti
Raoul Manenti
Gentile Francesco FicetolaGentile Francesco Ficetola
Gentile Francesco Ficetola
Relationships between species and their habitats are not always constant. Different processes may determine changes in species-habitat association: individuals may prefer different habitat typologies in different periods, or they may be forced to occupy a different habitat in order to follow the changing environment. The aim of our study was to assess whether cave salamanders change their habitat association pattern through the year, and to test whether such changes are determined by environmental changes or by changes in preferences. We monitored multiple caves in Central Italy through one year, and monthly measured biotic and abiotic features of microhabitat and recorded Italian cave salamanders distribution. We used mixed models and niche similarity tests to assess whether species-habitat relationships remain constant through the year. Microhabitat showed strong seasonal variation, with the highest variability in the superficial sectors. Salamanders were associated to relatively cold and humid sectors in summer, but not during winter. Such apparent shift in habitat preferences mostly occurred because the environmental gradient changed through the year, while individuals generally selected similar conditions. Nevertheless, juveniles were more tolerant to dry sectors during late winter, when food demand was highest. This suggests that tolerance for suboptimal abiotic conditions may change through time, depending on the required resources. Differences in habitat use are jointly determined by environmental variation through time, and by changes in the preferred habitat. The trade-offs between tolerance and resources requirement are major determinant of such variation.