Cari Van Schalkwyk

Dr. Cari Van Schalkwyk


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 May 2022 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JPJuliet R. C. Pulliam
Juliet R. C. Pulliam
Cari Van SchalkwykCari Van Schalkwyk
Cari Van Schalkwyk
NGNevashan Govender
Nevashan Govender
AGAnne von Gottberg
Anne von Gottberg
CCCheryl Cohen
Cheryl Cohen
HMHarry Moultrie
Harry Moultrie
We provide two methods for monitoring reinfection trends in routine surveillance data to identify signatures of changes in reinfection risk and apply these approaches to data from South Africa’s severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic to date. Although we found no evidence of increased reinfection risk associated with circulation of the Beta (B.1.351) or Delta (B.1.617.2) variants, we did find clear, population-level evidence to suggest immune evasion by the Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant in previously infected individuals in South Africa. Reinfections occurring between 1 November 2021 and 31 January 2022 were detected in individuals infected in all three previous waves, and there has been an increase in the risk of having a third infection since mid-November 2021.

11 November 2021 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
JPJuliet R.C. Pulliam
Juliet R.C. Pulliam
Cari Van SchalkwykCari Van Schalkwyk
Cari Van Schalkwyk
NGNevashan Govender
Nevashan Govender
AGAnne von Gottberg
Anne von Gottberg
CCCheryl Cohen
Cheryl Cohen
HMHarry Moultrie
Harry Moultrie
Summary: Introduction: Globally, there have been more than 404 million cases of SARS-CoV-2, with 5.8 million confirmed deaths, as of February 2022. South Africa has experienced four waves of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, with the second, third, and fourth waves being driven by the Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants, respectively. A key question with the emergence of new variants is the extent to which they are able to reinfect those who have had a prior natural infection. Rationale: We developed two approaches to monitor routine epidemiological surveillance data to examine whether SARS-CoV-2 reinfection risk has changed through time in South Africa, in the context of the emergence of the Beta (B.1.351), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.529) variants. We analyze line list data on positive tests for SARS-CoV-2 with specimen receipt dates between 04 March 2020 and 31 January 2022, collected through South Africa’s National Notifiable Medical Conditions Surveillance System. Individuals having sequential positive tests at least 90 days apart were considered to have suspected reinfections. Our routine monitoring of reinfection risk included comparison of reinfection rates to the expectation under a null model (approach 1) and estimation of the time-varying hazards of infection and reinfection throughout the epidemic (approach 2) based on model-based reconstruction of the susceptible populations eligible for primary and second infections. Results: 105,323 suspected reinfections were identified among 2,942,248 individuals with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 who had a positive test result at least 90 days prior to 31 January 2022. The number of reinfections observed through the end of the third wave in September 2021 was consistent with the null model of no change in reinfection risk (approach 1). Although increases in the hazard of primary infection were observed following the introduction of both the Beta and Delta variants, no corresponding increase was observed in the reinfection hazard (approach 2). Contrary to expectation, the estimated hazard ratio for reinfection versus primary infection was lower during waves driven by the Beta and Delta variants than for the first wave (relative hazard ratio for wave 2 versus wave 1: 0.71 (CI 95 : 0.60–0.85); for wave 3 versus wave 1: 0.54 (CI 95 : 0.45–0.64)). In contrast, the recent spread of the Omicron variant has been associated with an increase in reinfection hazard coefficient. The estimated hazard ratio for reinfection versus primary infection versus wave 1 was 1.75 (CI 95 : 1.48–2.10) for the period of Omicron emergence (01 November 2021 to 30 November 2021) and 1.70 (CI 95 : 1.44–2.04) for wave 4 versus wave 1. Individuals with identified reinfections since 01 November 2021 had experienced primary infections in all three prior waves, and an increase in third infections has been detected since mid-November 2021. Many individuals experiencing third infections had second infections during the third (Delta) wave that ended in September 2021, strongly suggesting that these infections resulted from immune evasion rather than waning immunity. Conclusion: Population-level evidence suggests that the Omicron variant is associated with substantial ability to evade immunity from prior infection. In contrast, there is no population-wide epidemiological evidence of immune escape associated with the Beta or Delta variants. This finding has important implications for public health planning, particularly in countries like South Africa with high rates of immunity from prior infection. Further development of methods to track reinfection risk during pathogen emergence, including refinements to assess the impact of waning immunity, account for vaccine-derived protection, and monitor the risk of multiple reinfections will be an important tool for future pandemic preparedness.

1 January 2024 in JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Cari Van SchalkwykCari Van Schalkwyk
Cari Van Schalkwyk
MMMary Mahy
Mary Mahy
LJLeigh F. Johnson
Leigh F. Johnson
JIJeffrey W. Imai-Eaton
Jeffrey W. Imai-Eaton
Each year, supported by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), country teams across the globe produce estimates that chart the state of their HIV epidemics. In 2023, HIV estimates were available for 174 countries, accounting for 99% of the global population, of which teams from 150 countries actively engaged in this process. The methods used to derive these estimates are developed under the guidance of the UNAIDS Reference Group on Estimates, Modeling, and Projections (www.epidem.org). Updates to these methods and epidemiological analyses that inform parameters and assumptions are documented in this supplement.

7 May 2020 in Eurosurveillance
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CPCarl Ab Pearson
Carl Ab Pearson
Cari Van SchalkwykCari Van Schalkwyk
Cari Van Schalkwyk
AFAnna M Foss
Anna M Foss
KOKathleen M O'Reilly
Kathleen M O'Reilly
JPJuliet Rc Pulliam
Juliet Rc Pulliam
For 45 African countries/territories already reporting COVID-19 cases before 23 March 2020, we estimate the dates of reporting 1,000 and 10,000 cases. Assuming early epidemic trends without interventions, all 45 were likely to exceed 1,000 confirmed cases by the end of April 2020, with most exceeding 10,000 a few weeks later.

11 March 2021 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Cari Van SchalkwykCari Van Schalkwyk
Cari Van Schalkwyk
RDRob E. Dorrington
Rob E. Dorrington
TSThapelo Seatlhodi
Thapelo Seatlhodi
CVClaudia Velasquez
Claudia Velasquez
AFAli Feizzadeh
Ali Feizzadeh
LJLeigh F. Johnson
Leigh F. Johnson
Globally, large proportions of HIV-positive populations live in cities. The Fast-Track cities project aims to advance progress toward elimination of HIV as a public health threat by accelerating the response in cities across the world. This study applies a well-established HIV transmission model to provide key HIV estimates for the five largest metropolitan districts in South Africa (SA): Cape Town, Ekurhuleni, eThekwini, Johannesburg and Tshwane. We calibrate the model to metro-specific data sources and estimate progress toward the 90-90-90 targets set by UNAIDS (90% of people living with HIV (PLHIV) diagnosed, 90% of those diagnosed on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and viral suppression in 90% of those on ART). We use the model to predict progress towards similarly defined 95-95-95 targets in 2030. In SA, 90.5% of PLHIV were diagnosed in 2018, with metro estimates ranging from 86% in Johannesburg to 92% in eThekwini. However, only 68.4% of HIV-diagnosed individuals nationally were on ART in 2018, with the proportion ranging from 56% in Tshwane to 73% in eThekwini. Fractions of ART users who were virally suppressed ranged from 77% in Ekurhuleni to 91% in eThekwini, compared to 86% in the whole country. All five metros are making good progress to reach diagnosis targets and all (with the exception of Ekurhuleni) are expected to reach viral suppression targets in 2020. However, the metros and South Africa face severe challenges in reaching the 90% ART treatment target.

21 December 2021 in medRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
CPCarl A. B. Pearson
Carl A. B. Pearson
SSSheetal Prakash Silal
Sheetal Prakash Silal
MLMichael W.Z. Li
Michael W.Z. Li
JDJonathan Dushoff
Jonathan Dushoff
BBBenjamin Bolker
Benjamin Bolker
JPJuliet R. C. Pulliam
Juliet R. C. Pulliam
A new SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern, Omicron (B.1.1.529), has been identified based on genomic sequencing and epidemiological data in South Africa. Presumptive Omicron cases in South Africa have grown extremely rapidly, despite high prior exposure and moderate vaccination coverage. The available evidence suggests that Omicron spread is at least in part due to evasion of this immune protection, though Omicron may also exhibit higher intrinsic transmissibility. Using detailed laboratory and epidemiological data from South Africa, we estimate the constraints on these two characteristics of the new variant and their relationship. Our estimates and associated uncertainties provide essential information to inform projection and scenario modeling analyses, which are crucial planning tools for governments around the world. One Sentence Summary We report a region of plausibility for the relative transmissibility and immune escape characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant estimated by integrating laboratory and epidemiological data from South Africa.