The utilization of cold-formed steel (CFS) sections in construction has become widespread due to their favorable attributes, including their lightweight properties, high strength, recyclability, and ease of assembly. To ensure their continued safe and efficient utilization, this review provides a comprehensive investigation into the factors influencing the strength of CFS members. This analysis encompasses design codes, prediction methodologies, material properties, and various structural configurations. This review uncovers discrepancies among existing design codes, particularly noting conservative predictions in AISI and AS/NZS standards for composite and built-up sections. Additionally, the effectiveness of prediction methods such as the direct strength method and effective width method varies based on specific structural configurations and loading conditions. Furthermore, this review delves into recent advancements aimed at enhancing fire resistance, connection design, and the composite behavior of CFS structures. The influence of factors such as eccentricity, sheathing materials, and bolt spacing on structural performance is also examined. This study underscores the crucial role of accurate prediction methods and robust design standards in ensuring the structural integrity and safety of CFS constructions. Through a comparative analysis, it is revealed that AISI and AS/NZS standards exhibit conservatism in predicting nominal buckling loads compared to experimental data. Conversely, a non-linear finite element analysis demonstrates a strong correlation with laboratory tests, offering a more accurate prediction of nominal buckling capacity. Overall, this review offers comprehensive insights aimed at optimizing CFS structural design practices. By identifying key areas for future research and development, this work contributes to the ongoing advancement of safe and efficient CFS construction applications.
Cold-formed steel (CFS) sections constructed with high-strength steel have gained prominence in construction owing to their advantages, including a high strength-to-weight ratio, shape flexibility, availability in long spans, portability, cost-effectiveness, and design versatility. However, the thin thickness of CFS members makes them susceptible to various forms of buckling. This study focuses on addressing and mitigating different types of buckling in columns and beams by manipulating the lip length (d) and the ratio of inside radius to thickness (Ri/t) in CFS C-sections. To achieve this objective, a comprehensive analysis involving 176 models was conducted through the Finite Element Method (FEM). The findings reveal that an increase in lip length leads to a corresponding increase in critical elastic buckling load and moment (, , , , , and ). It is recommended to utilize a lip length greater than or equal to 15 mm for both columns and beams to mitigate various buckling types effectively. Conversely, an increase in the ratio of inside radius to thickness (Ri/t) results in an increase in critical elastic local buckling load () and moment (). Thus, lip length (d) significantly influences column and beam buckling, whereas Ri/t exhibits a relatively impactful effect. Subsequently, the experimental test results were used to verify finite element models. These insights contribute significant knowledge for optimizing the design and performance of CFS C-sections in structural applications.
Cold-formed steel channel (CFSC) sections have gained widespread adoption in building construction due to their advantageous properties, including superior energy efficiency, expedited construction timelines, environmental sustainability, material efficiency, and ease of transportation. This study presents a numerical investigation into the axial compressive behavior of CFSC section columns. A rigorously developed finite element model for CFSC sections was validated against existing experimental data from the literature. Upon validation, the model was employed for an extensive parametric analysis encompassing a dataset of 208 CFSC members. Furthermore, the efficacy of the design methodologies outlined in the AISI Specification and AS/NZS Standard were evaluated by comparing the axial load capacities obtained from the numerically generated data with the results of four previously conducted experimental tests. The findings reveal that the codified design equations, based on nominal compressive resistances determined using the current direct strength method, exhibit a conservative bias. On average, these equations underestimate the actual load capacities of CFSC section columns by approximately 11.5%. Additionally, this investigation explores the influence of eccentricity, cross-sectional dimensions, and the point-of-load application on the axial load capacity of CFSC columns. The results demonstrate that a decrease in section thickness, an increase in column length, and a higher degree of eccentricity significantly reduce the axial capacity of CFSC columns.