Background: Fibrocartilaginous embolic myelopathy (FCEM) and acute non-compressive nucleus pulposus extrusion (ANNPE) are common causes of acute spinal cord injury in dogs. Outcome among paraplegic deep pain positive (DPP) and deep pain negative (DPN) dogs with either condition and factors influencing recovery have not been clearly established.Methods: Dogs with thoracolumbar FCEM or ANNPE resulting in paraplegia presenting to university hospitals between 2012 and 2022 were retrospectively included. Diagnosis of FCEM or ANNPE was based on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Outcome was defined as successful (recovery of independent ambulation) or unsuccessful (non-ambulatory ≥3 months following diagnosis or at the time of death/euthanasia). Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate associations between clinical or imaging variables and outcome.Results: Thirty-one dogs were included. In total, 14 dogs were initially paraplegic DPP (8 FCEM, 6 ANNPE) and 17 dogs were paraplegic DPN (11 FCEM, 6 ANNPE). Outcome was available for 26 dogs (14 DPP, 12 DPN) with a median follow-up time of 182 days (range 0–2,311) including 2 dogs euthanized at the time of diagnosis; 1 of 12 DPN dogs (8.3%) regained independent ambulation, whereas 9 of 14 DPP dogs (64.3%) regained independent ambulation. DPN dogs had a significantly higher risk of not regaining independent ambulation compared with DPP dogs (OR: 47.40, 95% CI: 2.09–1073.99). No other variables were associated with outcome.Conclusion: While recovery of ambulation was possible, these results confirm that the absence of pain perception is a useful negative prognostic indicator in dogs with severe thoracolumbar FCEM or ANNPE.

Nerve sheath tumors (NSTs) are well-recognized primary nervous system tumors, but there is relatively limited information in dogs including comparison of NSTs in different anatomical locations. This retrospective study describes the clinical features and outcomes in a group of dogs with NSTs affecting the cranial nerves or spinal nerves. Thirty dogs were included, 25 with a presumptive diagnosis and five confirmed by histopathologic analysis. Seven dogs also had cytology of tumor samples, which were supportive of the NST diagnosis in four. Eight dogs had cranial nerve-associated NSTs, with six involving the trigeminal nerve. Twenty-two dogs had spinal nerve-associated NSTs including 13 invading the spinal canal and nine peripheral to the spinal canal, with the majority affecting nerves or nerve roots of the brachial plexus. The prognosis was poor, with dogs being euthanized eventually because of disease progression. Among dogs alive 1 week after diagnosis, the median survival time was 4 months but ranged from 2 weeks to >2 years. While there was a broad overlap between NST locations, survival was generally longer for dogs without spinal canal or intracranial involvement. The results expand available information on NSTs in dogs but should be interpreted with caution given the small number of dogs with a definitive diagnosis. Further investigation is warranted to determine how tumor location, invasiveness, and treatments pursued impact outcome.

Background: Approximately 50%–60% of paraplegic deep pain negative (DPN) dogs secondary to thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion (TL-IVDE) recover ambulation after surgery. Mean F-wave duration has been associated with injury severity in TL-IVDE in dogs, but the relationship to outcome is unknown. Objective: Evaluate the prognostic utility of F-waves in DPN dogs secondary to TL-IVDE treated surgically. Animals: Thirty client-owned, acutely paraplegic DPN dogs secondary to TL-IVDE were managed surgically. Methods: Multi-center prospective and observational study. F-waves were performed at baseline (within 24 h post-operatively), 2–4 weeks and 3 months post-operatively. Outcome was categorized as successful or unsuccessful, with success defined as independent ambulation at 3 months post-operatively. F-wave variables were compared between dogs with a successful or unsuccessful outcome and over time using generalized estimating equations. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were generated for baseline F-wave variables. Results: F-waves were well-tolerated in all dogs. Of 30 enrolled dogs, 12 dogs had a successful outcome, 10 dogs were unsuccessful, and 8 dogs were removed from outcome analysis (3 progressive myelomalacia, 1 severe spinal shock, 2 technical error, and 2 unknown outcome). Baseline mean F-wave duration (displayed as median (range)) was longer in unsuccessful dogs (31.7 (11.4–60.8) ms) versus successful dogs (19.6 (10.8–27.3) ms), p = 0.003. Mean F-wave duration > 28.5 ms was 70% sensitive (95% confidence interval (CI): 40%–100%) and 100% specific (95% CI: 100%–100%) in predicting an unsuccessful outcome. Conclusions and Clinical Importance: F-waves performed shortly post-operatively could aid in predicting outcomes in DPN dogs secondary to TL-IVDE treated surgically.

Background: In dogs undergoing vertebral column stabilization, post-operative computed tomography (CT) evaluates implant placement. The impact on the interpretation of metallic artifact associated with titanium implants in dogs remains to be established. Our objective was to quantify metallic artifact on CT associated with titanium pedicle screws.Methods: The study design included an in vitro model and a retrospective review of 11 dogs with vertebral column stabilization. Twenty four titanium pedicle screws (6 each: 2.0 mm, 2.7 mm, 3.5 mm, and 4.5 mm) were inserted into a 20% ballistic gel, and CT scan of the construct was performed. Three blinded raters used a bone window to measure the maximum width (effective size) of each screw, one rater measured effective size using an ultrawide window and 45 titanium pedicle screws (3×2.0 mm, 5×2.7 mm, 30×3.5 mm, and 7×4.5 mm) in 11 clinical cases. Effective size measurements were compared to actual screw sizes.Results: The effective size was 26.9–43.8%, 9.2–18.5%, and 21.1–30.5% larger than the actual size for the in vitro system (bone window), in vitro system (ultrawide window), and clinical cases, respectively. The mean gross difference for the in vitro measurements varied by implant size (p < 0.001) and was positively correlated with implant size (r = 0.846), but the mean percentage difference was negatively correlated with implant size (p < 0.001). Overestimation was larger for the in vitro model bone window compared to the ultrawide window (p < 0.001) and clinical cases (p = 0.001).Conclusion: Metallic artifact associated with titanium pedicle screws on CT resulted in an overestimation of screw size. This information might aid in the interpretation of implant placement on post-operative imaging.

The underwater treadmill (UWTM) is utilized in dogs recovering from thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion (TL-IVDE). Gait scoring is validated for dogs with TL-IVDE walking on the land treadmill (LT) but has not been reported for the UWTM. Our objective was to investigate if LT gait analysis could be applied to the UWTM and if non-ambulatory dogs walking unassisted on the UWTM, at a standardized water level, would be more likely to generate gait scores compared to on the LT. This was a prospective, observational study in dogs with TL-IVDE managed surigcally. At 0, 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-operatively, paired video footage of dogs walking on the LT and UWTM (water level at the greater trochanter) was used to generate 0-100 stepping (SS) and coordination (regularity index, RI) scores. Scores were compared between treadmill type and over time. Twenty dogs were enrolled and seventy-eight paired recordings were available for review. Median gait scores increased over time but did not differ by treadmill type (P = 0.262 for SS, P = 0.533 for RI). Combining SS and RI, more recordings received scores of 0 for the LT (n=58/156; 37.2%) compared to the UWTM (n=44/156; 28.2%; P = 0.043). Scores of 0, at visits when there was at least movement present at multiple joints, was more common on the LT (n=11/108; 10.2%) compared to the UWTM (n=2/108, 1.9%; P = 0.026). In dogs recovering from TL-IVDE, LT-based gait scoring was feasible in dogs walking on the UWTM and might complement other gait analysis methods, especially for non-ambulatory dogs.

Electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing is uncommonly utilized in dogs other than for investigation of disorders of the neuromuscular system. In dogs with diseases affecting the spinal cord or cauda equina, EDX testing can provide functional data complementary to imaging information that together can guide therapeutic and management approaches. Additionally, in some clinical scenarios, EDX testing prior to advanced imaging is integral to identifying if there is spinal cord or cauda equina involvement and can aid in determining the appropriate diagnostic path. This review will outline EDX testing methods that have been reported in dogs relating to the diagnosis, monitoring or prognosis of various conditions affecting the spinal cord and cauda equina. The various tests will be briefly outlined regarding how they are performed and what information is provided. The main focus will be on clinical applications including highlighting situations where EDX testing is useful for differentiating between neurologic and non-neurologic presentations. Additional ways these EDX techniques could be incorporated in the management of diseases of the spinal cord and cauda equina in dogs will be presented.