Insertion of central venous port (CVP) catheter in the cancer population is associated with increased incidence of venous thromboembolic events (VTE). However, trials have shown limited benefit of antithrombotic treatment to prevent catheter-related venous thrombosis. This prospective observational cohort study was designed to assess the incidence of VTE closely related to CVP implantation in patients with cancer and undergoing chemotherapy, and to identify a high risk subgroup of patients. Between February 2006 and December 2011, 1097 consecutive cancer patients with first CVP implantation were included. Catheter-related VTE were defined as deep venous thrombosis in the arm, with or without pulmonary embolism (PE), or isolated PE. The incidence of CVP-associated VTE was 5.9% (IC95 4.4–7.3%) at 3 months, and 11.3% (IC95 9.4–13.2%) at 12 months. The incidence of any VTE was 7.6% (IC95 6.0–9.3%) at 3 months, and 15.3% (IC95 13.1–17.6%) at 12 months. High Khorana risk score and lung cancer were significant predictors of 3 month VTE. In conclusion, this large cohort study of patients with first CVP catheter implantation confirms the high incidence of VTE associated with the CVP implantation and allow identifying high risk patients who may benefit from thromboprophylaxis.

Objectives. To determine the ferritin inter-assay differences between three “Conformité Européenne” (CE) marked tests, the impact on reference intervals (RI), and the proportion of individuals with iron deficiency (ID), we used plasma and serum from healthy blood donors (HBD) recruited in three different Switzerland regions. Design and Methods. Heparinized plasma and serum from HBD were obtained from three different transfusion centers in Switzerland (Fribourg, Geneva, and Neuchatel). One hundred forty samples were recruited per center and per matrix, with a gender ratio of 50%, for a total of 420 HBD samples available per matrix. On both matrices, ferritin concentrations were quantified by three different laboratories using electrochemiluminescence (ECL), latex immunoturbidimetric assay (LIA), and luminescent oxygen channeling immunoassay (LOCI) assays, respectively. The degree of agreement between matrices and between the three sites/methods was assessed by Passing–Bablok and we evaluated the proportion of individuals deemed to have ID per method. Results. Overall, no difference between serum and heparinized plasma ferritin values was observed according to Passing–Bablok analyses (proportional bias range: 1.0–3.0%; maximum constant bias: 1.84 µg/L). Significant median ferritin differences (p < 0.001 according to Kruskal–Wallis test) were observed between the three methods (i.e., 83.6 µg/L, 103.5 µg/L, and 62.1 µg/L for ECL, LIA, and LOCI in heparinized plasma, respectively), with proportional bias varying significantly between ±16% and ±32% on serum and from ±14% to ±35% on plasma with no sign of gender-related differences. Affecting the lower end of RI, the proportion of ID per method substantially varied between 4.76% (20/420) for ECL, 2.86% (12/420) for LIA, and 9.05% (38/420) for LOCI. Conclusions. Serum and heparinized plasma are exchangeable for ferritin assessment. However, the order of magnitude of ferritin differences across methods and HBD recruitment sites could lead to diagnostic errors if uniform RI were considered. Challenging the recently proposed use of uniform ferritin thresholds, our results highlight the importance of method- and region-specific RI for ferritin due to insufficient inter-assay harmonization. Failing to do so significantly impacts ID diagnosis.

Background Cardiology guidelines recommend measuring high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) for the diagnostic work-up of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Many hospitals measure hs-cTnT, but preliminary data have shown that hs-cTnT is higher than normal in many hemodialysis patients without evidence of ACS. The purpose of this study was therefore to determine the hs-cTnT levels every month for 1 year in asymptomatic hemodialysis patients, in order to assess their changes over time relative to creatine kinase. Methods Fourty-four hemodialysis patients (mean age 67 ± 14 years) were included. The predialysis levels of fifth-generation hs-cTnT, CK, and CK-MB were measured every month for 1 year using a Cobas® 6000 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland). Results Almost 100% of hs-cTnT measurements were higher than normal (N < 14 ng/L); the mean ± SD annual level was 84 ± 59 ng/L, ranging from a minimum of 24 ± 2 to 241 ± 28 ng/L in individual patients. The mean levels of CK and CK-MB were normal. Thirteen myocardial infarctions were analyzed, which were all associated with an initial elevation in hs-cTnT >45% from the individual baseline value. By comparison, CK and CK-MB only increased in 38% and 31% of these myocardial infarctions, respectively. Discussion hs-cTnT is persistently higher than normal in chronic hemodialysis patients. Standard algorithms for diagnosing ACS can obviously not be used and alternative diagnostic strategies need to be developed. According to our data, and given the huge variation in baseline hs-cTnT levels among patients, the use of higher cut-offs as proposed in the literature cannot be recommended. Instead, we consider that hs-cTnT should be checked at regular intervals (e.g., every 3–6 months) in order to establish individual baseline levels for hs-cTnT. This approach, in most instances, not only makes it possible to more rapidly rule-in but also to rapidly rule-out, cases of ACS in hemodialysis patients who develop cardiac symptoms.

Hemolytic blood samples are the number one cause for specimen rejection at emergency departments. Triggered by unsuitable blood sampling material or incorrect handling and a related strong vacuum force, hemolytic samples often must be retaken. The objective of this study was to assess whether correct manual aspiration using S-Monovette® could reduce the number of hemolytic samples. Between January and April 2019, a head-to-head study was conducted. Whereas in the first eight weeks, all specimens were collected using Vacutainer®, in the second eight weeks, blood was taken using S-Monovette® in aspiration mode. Specimens were categorized into five classes (0–30, 31–50, 51–75, 76–100, and 101+ mg/dl of cell-free hemoglobin) and for the statistical analyses, all samples exceeding 30 mg/dl were classified as hemolytic. Data were collected on 4794 blood specimens (Vacutainer®: 2634 samples, S-Monovette®: 2160 samples). While the percentage of non-hemolytic samples (HI of 0–30 mg/dl) was substantially higher for specimens drawn by S-Monovette® (95.7 %) than Vacutainer® (83.0 %), the opposite was true for all HI categories above 30 mg/dl. Importantly, the reduction of hemolytic samples took place immediately following the imposition of S-Monovette® and remained stable at a low level until the end of the study. Based on our results, we conclude that switching to S-Monovette® in manual aspiration mode in the blood sampling process could be highly beneficial, not only from a financial point of view, but also with regards to reducing unnecessary tasks and stress for nursing staff and improving patient outcome overall.

Background: The inverse association between HDL‐cholesterol (HDL‐C) levels and the risk of cardiovascular diseases is evident. Hypothesis: Our hypothesis was that higher levels of HDL‐C predisposed patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) to chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) rather than acute coronary syndrome (ACS), which has not clearly been demonstrated yet. Aim: To determine, in an unselected population of patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), if HDL‐C levels are independently higher in subjects presenting with CCS compared with those with ACS. Methods and Results: In this retrospective study, we identified 4215 patients who underwent PCI in the Cardio‐FR database. A total of 2942 patients met the selection criteria and completed at least a 1‐year follow‐up: 1686 suffered an ACS whereas 1256 presented with CCS. We found that low HDL‐C levels were significantly associated with ACS and high HDL‐C levels with CCS. This was consistent across all BMI categories in both genders. In addition, higher HDL‐C levels reduced the likelihood of CAD subjects developing ACS. Specifically, each mmol/L increase in HDL‐C decreased the odds of ACS by 79%. Interestingly, the CCS group had more polymorbid subjects than the ACS group. At 2‐year follow‐up, no difference in patient‐oriented composite endpoint was seen between high and low HDL‐C groups. Conclusion: In an unselected population of coronary patients, HDL‐C levels were consistently lower in individuals presenting with ACS compared with CCS, independently of BMI and gender. This finding strengthens the hypothesis that HDL‐C plays a role in long‐term protection against atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability. Considering HDL‐C level still makes sense. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04185285