Frederick Below

Dr. Frederick Below

College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

43Years (1984-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2013 in Agronomy Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRoss R. Bender
Ross R. Bender
JHJason W. Haegele
Jason W. Haegele
MRMatias L. Ruffo
Matias L. Ruffo
FBFrederick Below
Frederick Below
Modern maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids coupled with improved agronomic practices may have influenced the accumulation and partitioning of nutrient uptake since the last comprehensive studies were published. The objective of this study was to investigate nutrient uptake and partitioning among elite commercial germplasm with transgenic insect protection grown under modern management practices. Plants were sampled at six growth stages and divided into four fractions for nutrient determination. Total nutrients required per hectare to produce 23.0 Mg ha−1 of total biomass with 12.0 Mg ha−1 of grain included 286 kg N, 114 kg P2O5, 202 kg K2O, 59 kg Mg, 26 kg S, 1.4 kg Fe, 0.5 kg Mn, 0.5 kg Zn, 0.1 kg Cu, and 0.08 kg B. A 10‐d period (V10–V14) denoted the maximum rates of accumulation on a per day basis for dry weight (439 kg), N (8.9 kg), P2O5 (2.4 kg), K2O (5.8 kg), Mg (2.2 kg), S (0.7 kg), Zn (14.2 g), Mn (18.0 g), B (3.3 g), Fe (95.3 g), and Cu (3.0 g). The majority of total uptake occurred post‐flowering for P, S, Zn, and Cu. Harvest index values of P (79%), S (57%), Zn (62%), and N (58%) were identified in the grain. These results provide much needed data on the nutrient uptake and partitioning of current hybrids, and provide an opportunity to further refine fertilizer method and timing recommendations for maize biomass and grain production.

11 November 1992 in Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJ. S. Schepers
J. S. Schepers
DFD. D. Francis
D. D. Francis
MVM. Vigil
M. Vigil
FBFrederick Below
Frederick Below

1 March 2015 in Agronomy Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RBRoss R. Bender
Ross R. Bender
JHJason W. Haegele
Jason W. Haegele
FBFrederick Below
Frederick Below
The absence of recent data regarding the nutritional needs of modern soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production systems necessitates a greater comprehensive understanding of nutrient uptake, partitioning, and remobilization. The objective of this study was to evaluate macro‐ and micronutrient accumulation and partitioning in current soybean cultivars. Across 3 site‐years, plants were sampled at seven growth stages and divided into four plant tissue fractions for quantification of nutrient uptake. Accumulation (per ha) of 275 kg N, 21 kg P (48 kg P2O5), 172 kg K (207 kg K2O), 113 kg Ca, 50 kg Mg, 19 kg S, 335 g Zn, 371 g Mn, 325 g B, 849 g Fe, and 63 g Cu were required to produce approximately 3500 and 9500 kg ha−1 of grain and total biomass, respectively. Supplemental fertility modestly increased biomass and yield (2%), but did not alter nutrient partitioning or harvest index. Nutrients with high harvest index (i.e., percentage of total nutrient accumulation partitioned to grain) values included P (81%), N (73%), Cu (62%), and S (61%), which may serve as a limitation to high yield. Seasonal patterns of nutrient accumulation suggested that K and Fe were acquired primarily during late vegetative growth while the uptake of N, P, Ca, Mg, S, Zn, Mn, B, and Cu were more equally distributed between vegetative and seed‐filling growth phases. These results document the rate and duration of macro‐ and micronutrient accumulation in soybean, and highlight the importance of adequate nutrient availability during key crop growth periods.

26 June 2021 in Agronomy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CSConnor Sible
Connor Sible
JSJuliann R. Seebauer
Juliann R. Seebauer
FBFrederick Below
Frederick Below
Plant biostimulants are specialty products used to increase crop production and are quickly becoming common in the agricultural seed and chemical marketplace. Unlike traditional crop inputs, such as fertilizers or pesticides, biostimulants are unique in that a single product may have multiple avenues for influencing crop growth and development based on both the timing and the placement of application. This review presents a summary of the current status and descriptions of plant biostimulants with available literature on their uses in the row crop production of maize (Zea mays L.), soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), wheat (Triticum aestivum), and other major crop species. Biostimulants have much potential to improve crop production through enhanced yields, grain quality, and increased sustainability of agronomic production systems, particularly in relation to nutrient management. However, there is great variability in the efficacy of biostimulants and a limited understanding of the mechanisms responsible in field-tested scenarios where differences are observed. These unknown mechanisms may align with the recognized soil health indicators, providing opportunities for unrealized biostimulant potential beyond crop growth and development. This review aims to identify the predominant types of crop biostimulants, the known understandings of their modes of action, and examples of their current field efficacy with an outlook for their future.

1 March 2013 in Agronomy Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LGLaura F. Gentry
Laura F. Gentry
MRMatias L. Ruffo
Matias L. Ruffo
FBFrederick Below
Frederick Below
It is widely accepted that yields decline when corn (Zea mays L.) is grown continuously vs. in rotation with soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], although causes for the yield reduction are unclear. The primary objective of this study was to elucidate the source(s) of the continuous corn yield penalty (CCYP). The experiment was conducted from 2005 to 2010 in east‐central Illinois beginning with third‐year continuous corn (CC) or a soybean–corn (SC) rotation at six N fertilizer rates. Averaged across all years, yield at the agronomic optimum N rate for CC was 8.84 Mg ha−1 and for SC was 10.20 Mg ha−1, resulting in a CCYP of 1.36 Mg ha−1; values ranged yearly from 0.47 to 2.23 Mg ha−1. Using a regression model, three significant and independent predictors explained >99% of the variability in the CCYP: unfertilized CC yield (0NCCYD), years in CC (CCYRS), and the difference between CC and SC delta yields (maximum yield – unfertilized yield) (DELTADIFF). The strongest predictor, 0NCCYD, reflects net soil N mineralization and demonstrates that it decreases in CC systems. The CCYRS was strongly and positively correlated with CCYP, indicating that the CCYP increased through Year 7. We believe that CCYRS measures the effects of accumulated corn residue in CC systems. Finally, we consider DELTADIFF to be a measure of the interaction between yearly weather patterns and crop rotation, which results in more negative yield responses for CC than SC under hot or dry conditions. This study concluded that the primary causative agents of the CCYP are N availability, corn residue accumulation, and weather.

1 July 2013 in Crop Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JHJason W. Haegele
Jason W. Haegele
KCKevin A. Cook
Kevin A. Cook
DNDevin M. Nichols
Devin M. Nichols
FBFrederick Below
Frederick Below
Further enhancement of maize (Zea mays L.) N‐use efficiency (NUE) will benefit from a thorough understanding of how genetic improvement has shaped N use parameters. Since selection for grain yield has occurred at high N fertilizer rates, our hypothesis was that modern hybrids would have a greater response to supplemental N than hybrids from earlier eras. In 2009 and 2010, 21 single‐cross maize hybrids released between 1967 and 2006 were characterized for grain yield and N use traits. While the ability to acquire mineralized soil N did not change over era, the utilization increased with decade of introduction (0.24 kg kg–1 of plant N [kgplantN–1] yr–1; R2 = 0.37). Increases of grain yield at high N (86 kg ha–1 yr–1; R2 = 0.68) over era were accompanied by increases at low N of 56 kg ha–1 yr–1 (R2 = 0.69). Grain yield improvements at all levels of N were associated with decreased barrenness and increased kernel number expressed on a per‐plant and per‐area basis. Fertilizer N response, NUE, increased at a rate of 0.16 kg kg–1 of fertilizer N (kgN–1) yr–1 (R2 = 0.40). Increased NUE was positively correlated with improved N‐uptake efficiency (r = 0.76, P ≤ 0.001), due to the greater postflowering N uptake of more recent hybrids. The response of grain yield to fertilizer N in current hybrids is more dependent on uptake of fertilizer N than the efficiency of fertilizer N utilization, and approximately two‐thirds of genetic gain for grain yield at high N can be explained by improvements in grain yield at low N.