Malini Capoor

Malini Capoor


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

22Years (2005-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2021 in Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MCMalini Capoor
Malini Capoor
APAnnapurna Parida
Annapurna Parida

28 December 2005 in Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMalini Capoor
Malini Capoor
DNDeepthi Nair
Deepthi Nair
MDMonorama Deb
Monorama Deb
PVPradeep Kumar Verma
Pradeep Kumar Verma
LSLakshmi Srivastava
Lakshmi Srivastava
PAPushpa Aggarwal
Pushpa Aggarwal
The spectrum of candidiasis has changed with the emergence of non-albicans Candida spp. and acquired antifungal resistance, especially in immunocompromised hosts. This changing scenario has necessitated routine antifungal susceptibility testing. In the present work, 102 Candida spp. isolates gathered during 2003 - 2004 were characterized by standard procedures, and antifungal susceptibility testing to amphotericin B, fluconazole and itraconazole was performed by broth macrodilution (BMD)-minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and disk diffusion (DD) methods. Among all isolates, 77.4% were from an ICU and 10.8% were obtained from a nursery. The majority of the isolates were C. tropicalis (48%), followed by C. parapsilosis (27.4%) and C. albicans (22.5%). Overall 6.9, 4.9 and 3.9% of all isolates were resistant to amphotericin B, fluconazole and itraconazole, respectively. Out of the 5 (4.9%) isolates resistant to fluconazole, 4 (3.9%) were from patients with AIDS on fluconazole prophylaxis. A discrepancy was observed between the results of susceptibility testing by DD and those by BMD-MIC: 15 (14.7%) isolates were reported to be resistant by DD despite having low MICs. Based on these results, it was concluded that initial antifungal screening of clinical isolates by the DD method followed by confirmation of resistant strains by the broth dilution method is desirable to optimize patient management.

1 January 2010 in Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MCMalini Capoor
Malini Capoor
SSSujata Sarabahi
Sujata Sarabahi
VTVinay Kumar Tiwari
Vinay Kumar Tiwari
RNRavi Prakash Narayanan
Ravi Prakash Narayanan
Burn wound infection (BWI) is a major public health problem and the most devastating form of trauma worldwide. Fungi cause BWI as part of monomicrobial or polymicrobial infection, fungaemia, rare aggressive soft tissue infection and as opportunistic infections. The risk factors for acquiring fungal infection in burns include age of burns, total burn size, body surface area (BSA) (30-60%), full thickness burns, inhalational injury, prolonged hospital stay, late surgical excision, open dressing, artificial dermis, central venous catheters, antibiotics, steroid treatment, long-term artificial ventilation, fungal wound colonisation (FWC), hyperglycaemic episodes and other immunosuppressive disorders. Most of the fungal infections are missed owing to lack of clinical awareness and similar presentation as bacterial infection coupled with paucity of mycology laboratories. Expedient diagnosis and treatment of these mycoses can be life-saving as the mortality is otherwise very high. Emergence of resistance in non-albicans Candida spp., unusual yeasts and moulds in fungal BWI, leaves very few fungi susceptible to antifungal drugs, leaving many patients susceptible. There is a need to speciate fungi as far as the topical and systemic antifungal is concerned. Deep tissue biopsy and other relevant samples are processed by standard mycological procedures using direct microscopy, culture and histopathological examination. Patients with FWC should be treated by aggressive surgical debridement and, in the case of fungal wound infection (FWI), in addition to surgical debridement, an intravenous antifungal drug, most commonly amphotericin B or caspofungin, is prescribed followed by de-escalating with voriconazole or itraconazole, or fluconazole depending upon the species or antifungal susceptibility, if available. The propensity for fungal infection increases, the longer the wound is present. Therefore, the development of products to close the wound more rapidly, improvement in topical antifungal therapy with mould activity and implementation of appropriate systemic antifungal therapy guided by antifungal susceptibility may improve the outcome for severely injured burn victims.

1 October 2019 in Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
APAnnapurna Parida
Annapurna Parida
MCMalini Capoor
Malini Capoor
KBKumar Tapas Bhowmik
Kumar Tapas Bhowmik
INTRODUCTION: Biomedical waste poses physical, chemical, radiological, and microbiological risks to the public and health-care workers (HCWs) for current and future generations. AIM: The aim was to gauge the depth of understanding amongst HCWs on biomedical waste management (BMWM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A predesigned questionnaire on knowledge, attitude, and practices on BMWM Rules, 2016 (Principle), and 2018 (Amendment), Solid Waste Rules, 2016, and health hazards in HCW was distributed to all participants. RESULTS: Only 68% of the participants knew that the most important step in waste management is waste segregation. Eighty-two percent of the HCWs working in this setup knew of the different color-coded bins used for segregation. However, awareness was lacking with respect to health hazards associated with improperly segregated and disposed off biomedical waste as only 49% answered the questions on the hazards of waste correctly. Laboratory waste handling was found to be the least understood area of the newer guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Training aspects of health-care waste management should be strengthened so that the current, existing, and future regulations are practiced diligently and uniformly. Periodic evaluation and assessment should become routine to enforce adherence to waste management.

17 July 2020 in Mycoses
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ACArunaloke Chakrabarti
Arunaloke Chakrabarti
PSPrashant Sood
Prashant Sood
SRShivaprakash Rudramurthy
Shivaprakash Rudramurthy
SCSharon Chen
Sharon Chen
JJJoseph Jillwin
Joseph Jillwin
FNFor The Siham Candidemia Network
For The Siham Candidemia Network

1 March 2017 in Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GSGunjesh Kumar Singh
Gunjesh Kumar Singh
MCMalini Capoor
Malini Capoor
DNDeepthi Nair
Deepthi Nair
KBK.T. Bhowmik
K.T. Bhowmik
Radiotherapy for head and neck cancers (HNC) causes alteration of oral mucosal barrier predisposing it to colonization and infection. Such infections often result in pain and burning sensation thus contributing to major morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study was done on 50 patients of HNC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Three samples (throat, urine, blood) were collected for fungal culture and sensitivity. These samples were collected before the start of radiotherapy, during radiotherapy (2nd and 6th week) and post radiotherapy (10th week). Only 49 patients were available for analysis. Fungal infection was found in 27/49 patients (55.10%) out of which Non-albicans Candida was isolated in 18/49 (36.73%) and Candida albicans in 9/49 (18.36%) cases. About 66.66% (18/27) isolates were sensitive to fluconazole. Maximum isolation of yeast was during 6th week of radiotherapy. All grade 4 and 71.42% of grade 3 oral mucositis were found in patients who were positive for fungal infection. The spectrum of fungal species in throat swab was: Non-albicans Candida and Candida albicans observed in 36.73% and 18.36% of patients respectively. Higher rate of fungal colonization and infection was found in patients with grade 3/4 oral mucositis. Prophylactic fluconazole in HNC patients on concurrent chemoradiotherapy has the potential to reduce emerging invasive fungal infection and its associated morbidity.