Background: This study aimed to compare the clinical, pathological, and biochemical characteristics of upper rectal cancer (URC) and mid–lower rectal cancer (MLRC) in stage II and III non-metastatic rectal cancer and to identify distinct prognostic factors influencing survival and recurrence. Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 100 patients with stage II and III non-metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by curative-intent surgery between 2021 and 2024. Patients were categorized into URC (n = 53) and MLRC (n = 47) groups. Parameters analyzed included demographic factors, ASA score, surgical characteristics, pathological features (tumor stage, lymph node involvement, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), tumor budding, tumor regression grade (TRG)), and biochemical markers (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), white blood cell (WBC) count, neutrophil count, platelet count (PLT), and C-reactive protein (CRP)). One-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival curves, and Cox regression models identified independent prognostic factors. Results: Preoperative CEA levels were higher in MLRC (p = 0.05), whereas WBC count (p = 0.01), neutrophil count (p = 0.02), PLT (p = 0.01), and CRP levels (p = 0.01) were higher in URC. Pathological analysis revealed higher LVI (p = 0.04), PNI (p = 0.04), and tumor budding (p = 0.03) in MLRC. At one-year follow-up, OS rates were 82.1% (URC) vs. 80.3% (MLRC) (p = 0.85), and DFS rates were 78.6% (URC) vs. 73.4% (MLRC) (p = 0.72). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified age (HR: 1.04, p = 0.03), ASA score (HR: 1.22, p = 0.01), CRP (HR: 1.18, p < 0.001), preoperative CEA (HR: 1.12, p = 0.02), preoperative CA19-9 (HR: 1.09, p = 0.03), LVI (HR: 1.42, p < 0.001), PNI (HR: 1.35, p = 0.02), and tumor budding (HR: 1.28, p = 0.03) as independent prognostic factors for OS. Similar trends were observed for DFS, with T stage (HR: 1.35, p = 0.01) and tumor size (HR: 1.22, p = 0.01) also being found significant. Conclusions: Inflammatory markers, tumor burden indicators (LVI, PNI, budding, tumor size, T stage), and preoperative CEA/CA19-9 were identified as significant predictors, suggesting a risk-adapted approach to rectal cancer treatment.

Visceral obesity is an important factor that increases the risk of complications after colorectal cancer surgery. As calculating visceral fat is difficult and time-consuming, more practical fat measurements that are not time-consuming have been introduced. This study aimed to investigate the effects of perirenal fat thickness on postoperative complications and prognosis in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Perirenal fat thickness was measured from the dorsal aspect of the left kidney on preoperative computerized tomography of patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer. The effects of perirenal fat thickness on postoperative complications were investigated. Diagnostic test performance was examined using the Roc Curve test to determine the cutoff value for the perirenal fat thickness values according to the complication findings of the patients. The cutoff value of perirenal fat thickness was found to be above 25.1, according to the presence of complications in the patients. Those with a perirenal fat thickness greater than 25.1 mm were considered to have high perirenal fat thickness values, and those with a low perirenal fat thickness value were considered low. Multivariate analysis revealed that increased perirenal fat thickness is an independent risk factor for postoperative complications. We believe that perirenal fat thickness measurement, as an indicator of visceral fat volume, can be used to identify patients at high risk of developing complications after colorectal cancer surgery. This may change the disease management and affect the patient information process.

Background and Objectives: Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) and mucinous components (MCP) in colorectal cancers (CRC) have shown conflicting results regarding their prognostic impact. This study aims to evaluate survival differences between MAC, MCP, and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (nMAC) in stage II and III CRC patients. Materials and Methods: 224 CRC patients who underwent surgery between 2013 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were classified as nMAC, MCP, or MAC based on the percentage of extracellular mucin. Those who received neoadjuvant therapy, had stage I or IV TNM disease, and emergency cases were excluded. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox regression models. Results: MAC patients showed worse survival outcomes compared to nMAC (p = 0.025). No difference in survival was found between MCP and nMAC (p = 0.055). Multivariate analysis identified MAC (OR: 2.814; p = 0.014) and perineural invasion (PNI) (OR: 2.283; p = 0.008) as independent factors associated with worse survival. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed MAC’s worse prognosis than nMAC (p = 0.027). Conclusions: MAC was shown to have a worse prognosis than nMAC in stage II and III CRC patients, while MCP survival rates were similar with nMAC. These findings suggest that MAC requires more careful treatment approaches, while MCP and nMAC have better survival rates. Further studies focusing on molecular and genetic profiles are needed to better understand these outcomes.

Background: The management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has seen the emergence of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) as a promising approach. TNT has shown potential in enhancing tumor regression, increasing pathological complete response (pCR) rates, and improving the control of systemic disease. However, the impact of TNT on complications during and after surgery remains uncertain. This research aimed to assess surgical complications linked to TNT in comparison with conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Additionally, this study explored the potential of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) as a predictor of surgical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Sancaktepe Şehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, including patients with LARC who underwent either TNT or nCRT followed by curative excision (TME). Demographic data, perioperative complications, and tumor-related variables were also analyzed. The prognostic value of the PNI in predicting surgical complications was assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 103 patients with LARC were included, of whom 38 (36.9%) received TNT and 65 (63.1%) underwent nCRT. TNT was associated with significantly higher rates of anastomotic leakage (13.2% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.04) and wound infections (23.7% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.02). The mean tumor size was significantly smaller in the TNT group (3.22 ± 1.10 cm) than in the nCRT group (3.65 ± 1.26 cm, p = 0.02). The PNI was significantly lower in the TNT group (38.96 ± 5.54) than in the nCRT group (41.31 ± 4.65, p = 0.03). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a lower PNI was independently associated with increased surgical complications (β = −1.09, p = 0.028, 95% CI: −2.06–−0.12). Conclusions: Although TNT demonstrates clear oncological benefits in LARC, it is associated with increased perioperative morbidity. Our findings suggest that the PNI is a valuable predictive biomarker of surgical complications in patients treated with TNT. Preoperative nutritional assessment and optimization may improve perioperative outcomes and mitigate the risks associated with TNT. Future prospective studies should explore targeted interventions to enhance the safety profile of TNT while preserving its oncological advantages.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy in asymptomatic individuals aged 45–49 years compared with those aged 50–54 years in a Turkish population, providing insights into region-specific screening strategies. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study was conducted across three tertiary endoscopy units in Turkey. Screening colonoscopy data from 3943 asymptomatic individuals aged 45–54 years between 2018 and 2023 were analyzed. The patients were stratified into two groups: 45–49 years (Group 1) and 50–54 years (Group 2). Demographic characteristics, polyp size, histological features, and prevalence of early-onset advanced colorectal neoplasia (EAO-aCRN) were assessed. Results: A total of 3943 patients were included, with 862 in Group 1 (45–49 years) and 3081 in Group 2 (50–54 years). The polyp detection rate was 16.6% in Group 1 and 22.9% in Group 2 (p < 0.001). The adenoma detection rates were 10.8% and 13.9% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.018). The advanced polyp detection rates were 3.2% and 7.3% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean polyp size was 6.5 ± 5.1 mm in Group 1 and 8.8 ± 8.4 mm in Group 2 (p < 0.001). The mean number of polyps per patient was 1.5 ± 0.8 in Group 1 and 1.9 ± 1.6 in Group 2 (p = 0.023). Advanced neoplasia was detected in 16.6% of Group 1 patients compared with 22.9% of Group 2 patients (p < 0.001). Conclusions: While CRC screening at age 45 demonstrated lower detection rates of polyps and advanced neoplasia than at age 50, the higher prevalence of EAO-CRN among 45–49-year-olds in Turkey underscores the importance of early screening in high-risk populations. Tailored regional strategies incorporating individual risk factors are crucial for optimizing CRC prevention policies.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic significance of staging laparoscopy (SL) compared to computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) in gastric cancer staging. We evaluated the ability of SL to detect occult peritoneal metastases and influence of SL on survival outcomes across cancer stages and treatment approaches. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 95 patients with gastric cancer underwent preoperative assessment using CT, PET-CT, and SL between 2018 and 2024. Diagnostic performance metrics were calculated for SL, CT, and PET/CT across the local, locally advanced, and metastatic stages. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves, and comparisons were made using log-rank tests. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model incorporating interaction terms was used to determine the independent prognostic factors affecting survival, focusing on SL findings and cytology results. Results: The cohort comprised 75 males (78.9%) and 20 females (21.1%), with a mean age of 57.4 ± 10.1 years. The tumor location distribution was predominant in the corpus (31.1%) and cardia. Tumor staging revealed that 48.1% were classified as T3 and 28.8% as T4, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy analysis showed that SL outperformed CT and PET-CT in detecting peritoneal metastasis across all stages. Specifically, SL demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 95% for local disease, 92% and 80% for locally advanced disease, and 95% and 99% for metastatic disease, significantly exceeding those of CT and PET-CT. Patients with SL findings had a median overall survival (OS) of 30 months compared with 20 months for those assessed only with CT and PET-CT (p < 0.05). The stage-specific median OS for SL patients was 40 months in the local, 25 months in the locally advanced (p < 0.05), and 15 months in the metastatic disease (p < 0.01) groups, indicating significant survival benefits. Multivariable Cox regression identified SL findings as an independent factor associated with reduced mortality risk (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50–0.90, p < 0.01), while positive cytology findings predicted poorer survival (HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.25–2.60, p < 0.01). Interaction terms revealed that SL yielded greater survival benefits in patients with metastatic disease (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60, p < 0.01) and those undergoing systemic therapy (HR: 0.75, p = 0.04). Conclusions: SL provides superior diagnostic accuracy and prognostic information for advanced gastric cancer staging compared with CT and PET-CT. By accurately detecting peritoneal metastasis, SL aids in optimizing treatment plans, particularly in advanced stages, thus potentially improving patient outcomes.