Thomas Finkenzeller

Prof. Dr. Thomas Finkenzeller

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2008 in Neuropsychologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDM. Doppelmayr
M. Doppelmayr
TFThomas Finkenzeller
Thomas Finkenzeller
PSP. Sauseng
P. Sauseng

1 September 2018 in Psychology of Sport and Exercise
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BKBjoern Krenn
Bjoern Krenn
TFThomas Finkenzeller
Thomas Finkenzeller
SWSabine Würth
Sabine Würth
GAGünter Amesberger
Günter Amesberger

1 December 2014
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HWHerbert Wagner
Herbert Wagner
TFThomas Finkenzeller
Thomas Finkenzeller
SWSabine Würth
Sabine Würth
SDSerge P Von Duvillard
Serge P Von Duvillard

1 October 2018 in Journal of Sport and Health Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MLMarko S. Laaksonen
Marko S. Laaksonen
TFThomas Finkenzeller
Thomas Finkenzeller
HHHans-Christer Holmberg
Hans-Christer Holmberg
GSGerold Sattlecker
Gerold Sattlecker
The biathlon, an Olympic sporting discipline that combines cross-country skiing with rifle marksmanship, entails considerable physiological demands, as well as fine motor control while shooting after intense exercise and under mental pressure. Although much of our knowledge about cross-country skiing is probably also applicable to the biathlon, carrying the rifle and shooting under stress make this discipline somewhat unique. The present review summarizes and examines the scientific literature related to biathlon performance, with a focus on physiological and biomechanical factors and shooting technique, as well as psychophysiological aspects of shooting performance. We conclude with suggestions for future research designed to extend our knowledge about the biathlon, which is presently quite limited.

25 May 2012 in European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AEAndreas Egger
Andreas Egger
David NiederseerDavid Niederseer
David Niederseer
GDGernot Diem
Gernot Diem
TFThomas Finkenzeller
Thomas Finkenzeller
ELE Ledl-Kurkowski
E Ledl-Kurkowski
JNJosef Niebauer
Josef Niebauer
Resistance training has become a mainstay of exercise training in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, it remains controversial whether hypertrophy resistance training (HRT) is superior to endurance resistance training (ERT) with regard to its effects on glycaemic control, muscle mass and strength. Thirty-two patients with T2DM (13 men and 19 women; 64.8 ± 7.8 years) were randomly assigned to either eight weeks of HRT (n = 16; 2 sets, 10–12 repetitions, 70% of the one-repetition maximum (1-RM)) or ERT (n = 16; 2 sets, 25–30 repetitions, 40% 1-RM). In addition, all patients participated in aerobic exercise training (AET; 1 hour/day on 2 non-consecutive days/week; cycle ergometer; 70% of heart rate reserve). After eight weeks of intervention, there were time but not group effects for reduced glucose and fructosamine levels, weight, BMI, waist circumference, subcutaneous abdominal fat, resting heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure; muscle mass of the arms and physical exercise capacity increased significantly. Significant time and group effects were documented for maximum strength of the chest, with a greater increase for HRT than ERT (p = 0.01). Specific maximal resistance training of the chest muscles led to superior gain in strength as compared to endurance resistance training. This, however, did not translate into superior values of glycaemic control, weight, waist circumference, muscle mass and physical work capacity, which all improved significantly by a similar magnitude in both groups. Since overall effects of both protocols were comparable, both may be offered to patients according to their personal preference.

1 November 2016 in International Journal of Psychophysiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GGGermano Gallicchio
Germano Gallicchio
TFThomas Finkenzeller
Thomas Finkenzeller
GSGerold Sattlecker
Gerold Sattlecker
SLStefan Lindinger
Stefan Lindinger
Kerstin HoedlmoserKerstin Hoedlmoser
Kerstin Hoedlmoser
This study explored the influence of sub-maximal cardiovascular load on electroencephalographic (EEG) activity preceding biathlon shooting. Frontal-midline theta and alpha power were examined to assess monitoring processes and cortical inhibition, respectively. Thirteen experienced biathletes (mean age: 17years; 5 males, 8 females) fired sets of five consecutive shots from the standing position at a 50-meter-distant target, under two fixed-order conditions: (i) at rest and (ii) immediately after 3-minute exercise on a bicycle ergometer at 90% of maximum heart rate (HR). HR and rate of physical exertion (RPE) were measured as manipulation checks. Shooting accuracy was assessed in target rings for each shot. Frontal-midline theta and alpha power were computed in the last second preceding each shot from average-reference 61-channel EEG and inter-individual differences were minimized through a median-scaled log transformation (Appendix). HR and RPE increased under cardiovascular load, however, shooting accuracy did not change. Pre-shooting frontal-midline theta power decreased, whereas alpha power increased over temporal and occipital - but not central - regions. These changes were larger for greater HR values. Additionally, higher frontal-midline theta, lower left-central alpha, and higher left-temporal alpha power were associated with more accurate shooting. These findings suggest that monitoring processes are beneficial to shooting performance but can be impaired by sub-maximal cardiovascular load. Greater inhibition of movement-irrelevant regions (temporal, occipital) and concomitant activation of movement-related regions (central) indicate that greater neural efficiency is beneficial to shooting performance and can allow trained biathletes to shoot accurately despite physically demanding conditions.