In order to improve the level of the urban living environment and improve the comfort level of the microclimate, this paper investigates and simulates numerically the influence on the wind environment of different tree species in various tree array layouts, aiming to enhance wind comfort in tree landscapes and reduce the risk of high wind speeds. Initially, the study analyzes the commonly used tree species in Hangzhou’s urban tree arrays (beech, soapberry, and camphor trees), summarizing three types of tree array layouts: retention, through, and enclosure. Subsequently, standard tree models are established to define their crown porosity, trunk elastic modulus, and other physical characteristics. Using fluid–structure interaction methods, the impact of different tree species on the wind environment within various tree array layouts is numerically simulated at a wind speed of 14 m/s. In conclusion, the retention layout is most effective in controlling wind speed. Camphor trees perform excellently in reducing wind speed within both retention and enclosure tree array layouts, with wind reduction efficiencies of 16.06% and 14.09%, respectively. Soapberry trees show optimal wind speed reduction in the through layout, achieving 12.31%.
The hot-summer and cold-winter climate zone spans a large latitude, where the passive means of retrofitting the Trombe wall (TW) can be utilized to effectively improve the indoor wind environment and thermal comfort. In this study, a public building in Wenzhou, China, was selected as the object, and CFD numerical simulations and the wind environment data in spring, summer, and fall were collected through field experimental measurements. Comparative analyses were carried out to explore the adaptive strategy and effectiveness of the application of the Trombe wall on the local wind environment and climate and to quantify the improvement effect of the application of the Trombe wall on the Indoor environment. The results showed that the application of the Trombe wall in spring and fall in hot-summer and cold-winter regions could obviously increase the average indoor wind speed and the wind speed at the building outlet by 0.2–0.8 m/s and 0.9–3.6 m/s, respectively. This further effectively prolongs the indoor thermal comfort hours in spring and fall, which is a relatively applicable season, while the ventilation performance in summer is poor compared to spring and fall seasons.