Umar Akram

Mr. Umar Akram

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
7 April 2024 in Biomedicines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SRSana Rehman
Sana Rehman
ANArsalan Nadeem
Arsalan Nadeem
UAUmar Akram
Umar Akram
ASAbeer Sarwar
Abeer Sarwar
AQAmmara Quraishi
Ammara Quraishi
VYVivek Yedavalli
Vivek Yedavalli
Ischemic stroke poses a significant global health challenge, necessitating ongoing exploration of its pathophysiology and treatment strategies. This comprehensive review integrates various aspects of ischemic stroke research, emphasizing crucial mechanisms, therapeutic approaches, and the role of clinical imaging in disease management. It discusses the multifaceted role of Netrin-1, highlighting its potential in promoting neurovascular repair and mitigating post-stroke neurological decline. It also examines the impact of blood–brain barrier permeability on stroke outcomes and explores alternative therapeutic targets such as statins and sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling. Neurocardiology investigations underscore the contribution of cardiac factors to post-stroke mortality, emphasizing the importance of understanding the brain–heart axis for targeted interventions. Additionally, the review advocates for early reperfusion and neuroprotective agents to counter-time-dependent excitotoxicity and inflammation, aiming to preserve tissue viability. Advanced imaging techniques, including DWI, PI, and MR angiography, are discussed for their role in evaluating ischemic penumbra evolution and guiding therapeutic decisions. By integrating molecular insights with imaging modalities, this interdisciplinary approach enhances our understanding of ischemic stroke and offers promising avenues for future research and clinical interventions to improve patient outcomes.

31 July 2025 in Clinical Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EAEeman Ahmad
Eeman Ahmad
SAShoaib Ahmad
Shoaib Ahmad
ANAzka Naeem
Azka Naeem
SAShahzaib Ahmed
Shahzaib Ahmed
MSMaryam Shehzad
Maryam Shehzad
GFGregg C. Fonarow
Gregg C. Fonarow
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be associated with fatal cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). We aim to identify CVD‐related mortality trends in patients with CKD in the US, examining the variation by sex, race, and region, and compare them to CVD‐related mortality trends in general.Methods: The CDC‐WONDER database was used to obtain age‐adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 population. Annual percent change (APC) and average APC (AAPC) in these rates were calculated using Joinpoint regression and comparisons were done using pairwise comparison.Results: From 1999 to 2020, a total of 605,384 CVD‐related deaths were observed in patients with CKD. The AAMR was almost double in males (11.0) than females (6.3). NH (Non‐Hispanic) Blacks or African Americans displayed the highest overall AAMR while NH Asians or Pacific Islanders displayed the lowest. AAMRs also varied substantially by region (Midwest: 8.8; West: 8.6; South: 8.0; Northeast: 7.3). States with the highest AAMR was the District of Columbia. Nonmetropolitan regions exhibited a slightly higher AAMR (8.6) than metropolitan regions (8.1). The AAPC for CVD‐related deaths in patients with CKD differed significantly from that of the general population for the entire cohort, across both sexes, as well as among NH Whites, NH Black or African Americans, and Hispanics or Latinos. Regional differences were also observed in the Midwest, Northeast, and West.Conclusion: Significant differences in CVD‐related deaths in patients with CKD were observed. These high‐risk groups should be the point of focus for targeted interventions to reduce CVD‐related mortality in CKD patients.

2 May 2025 in Sleep Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZNZain Ali Nadeem
Zain Ali Nadeem
ORObaid Ur Rehman
Obaid Ur Rehman
UAUmar Akram
Umar Akram
MIMuhammad Ali Iftikhar
Muhammad Ali Iftikhar
HIHamza Irfan
Hamza Irfan
AKAlishba Khan
Alishba Khan

16 October 2024 in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UAUmar Akram
Umar Akram
ZNZain Ali Nadeem
Zain Ali Nadeem
HAHaider Ashfaq
Haider Ashfaq
EFEeshal Fatima
Eeshal Fatima
HAHamza Ashraf
Hamza Ashraf
MAMuhammad Hassan Ahmad
Muhammad Hassan Ahmad

5 February 2026 in Clinical Cardiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SAShahzaib Ahmed
Shahzaib Ahmed
ZNZain Ali Nadeem
Zain Ali Nadeem
ANAimen Nadeem
Aimen Nadeem
HAHamza Ashraf
Hamza Ashraf
UAUmar Akram
Umar Akram
MAM. Chadi Alraies
M. Chadi Alraies
Objective: Hypertension is a key risk factor for aortic dissection (AD). AD, if left untreated, carries significant mortality rates. Our aim is to analyse trends in mortality due to AD in adults with primary hypertension in the United States (US). Methods: We used the CDC WONDER database to extract mortality data for patients with primary hypertension who died due to AD. Age‐adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) and crude mortality rates (CMRs) were extracted per 100 000 persons. Annual percentage changes (APCs) and average APCs (AAPCs) in AAMRs and CMRs were calculated using Joinpoint regression. Results: From 1999 to 2020, a total of 13 128 deaths due to AD were reported in patients with primary hypertension in the US. Males displayed a higher overall AAMR (0.3) than females (0.2) throughout the study period. Slight regional variations were observed, with the West showing the highest overall AAMR (0.4), followed by the Midwest (0.3), and the Northeast and South (0.2). In urban areas, AAMRs were higher than in rural areas until 2008. From 2009 to 2020, AAMRs remained stable in urban areas (0.3) but increased in rural areas from 2010 to 2020 (4.7). The highest state‐level AAMRs were observed in Hawaii, Oregon, and Oklahoma. Conclusion: Significant differences were observed in AAPCs compared to AD‐related mortality trends in the general population. Mortality trends revealed an initial decline followed by a gradual rise. Clinicians should focus on high‐risk groups and raise awareness about the disease in these populations.

16 April 2025 in DEN Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
UAUmar Akram
Umar Akram
SAShahzaib Ahmed
Shahzaib Ahmed
EFEeshal Fatima
Eeshal Fatima
EAEeman Ahmad
Eeman Ahmad
HAHamza Ashraf
Hamza Ashraf
KAKhabab Mohamed Ahmed
Khabab Mohamed Ahmed
Background: Colonoscopy is the gold standard for early detection and monitoring of colorectal cancer. Procedural effectiveness is dependent on optimal bowel preparation. Traditional polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions are difficult to tolerate, whereas newer low‐volume alternatives, including PEG with ascorbic acid and oral sulfate solutions (OSS), offer improved efficacy and tolerability. The meta‐analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OSS compared to PEG for bowel preparation in colonoscopy.Methods: Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception until June 2024. Only randomized controlled trials comparing OSS with PEG were included. Data was analyzed using R version 4.4.0 using a random effects model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results: Twenty‐one studies with 6346 participants met the inclusion criteria. OSS significantly improved adenoma detection (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04–1.22; p‐value <0.01; I2 = 0%) and polyp detection rates (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.06–1.26; p‐value <0.01; I2 = 0%), and had a higher Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score (MD, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13–0.50; p‐value <0.01; I2 = 81%). PEG was associated with more sleep disturbances (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.25–0.82; p‐value = 0.03; I2 = 0%). However, other adverse effects were similar between both solutions.Conclusion: OSS demonstrated superior adenoma and polyp detection rates. When compared to PEG, patients utilizing OSS achieved higher BBPS scores. Data gleaned support enhanced cleansing efficacy and safety of OSS as a bowel preparation regimen.