Felice Giangaspero

Prof. Felice Giangaspero

Department of Radiologic, Oncologic and Anatomo Pathological Sciences, University of Rome La Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

46Years (1981-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 March 2018 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDavid Capper
David Capper
DJDavid T. W. Jones
David T. W. Jones
MSMartin Sill
Martin Sill
VHVolker Hovestadt
Volker Hovestadt
DSDaniel Schrimpf
Daniel Schrimpf
SPStefan M. Pfister
Stefan M. Pfister
Accurate pathological diagnosis is crucial for optimal management of patients with cancer. For the approximately 100 known tumour types of the central nervous system, standardization of the diagnostic process has been shown to be particularly challenging—with substantial inter-observer variability in the histopathological diagnosis of many tumour types. Here we present a comprehensive approach for the DNA methylation-based classification of central nervous system tumours across all entities and age groups, and demonstrate its application in a routine diagnostic setting. We show that the availability of this method may have a substantial impact on diagnostic precision compared to standard methods, resulting in a change of diagnosis in up to 12% of prospective cases. For broader accessibility, we have designed a free online classifier tool, the use of which does not require any additional onsite data processing. Our results provide a blueprint for the generation of machine-learning-based tumour classifiers across other cancer entities, with the potential to fundamentally transform tumour pathology.

1 February 2016 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DSDominik Sturm
Dominik Sturm
BOBrent A. Orr
Brent A. Orr
UTUmut H. Toprak
Umut H. Toprak
VHVolker Hovestadt
Volker Hovestadt
DJDavid T.W. Jones
David T.W. Jones
MKMarcel Kool
Marcel Kool

2 July 2014 in Brain Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DLDavid N. Louis
David N. Louis
APArie Perry
Arie Perry
PBPeter Burger
Peter Burger
DEDavid W. Ellison
David W. Ellison
GRGuido Reifenberger
Guido Reifenberger
PWPieter Wesseling
Pieter Wesseling
Major discoveries in the biology of nervous system tumors have raised the question of how non‐histological data such as molecular information can be incorporated into the next World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors. To address this question, a meeting of neuropathologists with expertise in molecular diagnosis was held in Haarlem, the Netherlands, under the sponsorship of the International Society of Neuropathology (ISN). Prior to the meeting, participants solicited input from clinical colleagues in diverse neuro‐oncological specialties. The present “white paper” catalogs the recommendations of the meeting, at which a consensus was reached that incorporation of molecular information into the next WHO classification should follow a set of provided “ISN‐Haarlem” guidelines. Salient recommendations include that (i) diagnostic entities should be defined as narrowly as possible to optimize interobserver reproducibility, clinicopathological predictions and therapeutic planning; (ii) diagnoses should be “layered” with histologic classification, WHO grade and molecular information listed below an “integrated diagnosis”; (iii) determinations should be made for each tumor entity as to whether molecular information is required, suggested or not needed for its definition; (iv) some pediatric entities should be separated from their adult counterparts; (v) input for guiding decisions regarding tumor classification should be solicited from experts in complementary disciplines of neuro‐oncology; and (iv) entity‐specific molecular testing and reporting formats should be followed in diagnostic reports. It is hoped that these guidelines will facilitate the forthcoming update of the fourth edition of the WHO classification of central nervous system tumors.

1 February 1983 in Journal of Neurosurgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PBPeter C. Burger
Peter C. Burger
PDPhilip J. Dubois
Philip J. Dubois
SSS. Clifford Schold
S. Clifford Schold
KSKenneth R. Smith
Kenneth R. Smith
GOGuy L. Odom
Guy L. Odom
FGFelice Giangaspero
Felice Giangaspero
✓ Pathological findings in 20 cases of glioblastoma multiforme were correlated with clinical histories and computerized tomographic (CT) scans. This was done to define the neoplasm in three stages: before treatment, during remission, and during recurrence. The untreated lesions were markedly cellular neoplasms composed predominantly of small anaplastic cells. The radiographic central region of low density was necrosis, the enhancing rim was a cellular zone of viable neoplasm, and the perilesional low-density area was edema with infiltrating tumor. In these 20 cases, all of the identifiable neoplasms lay within the zone of peritumoral edema or contrast enhancement, although small anaplastic cells may have been present in more distant regions. The lesions in remission were remarkable for their minimal mass effect, discrete nature, extensive necrosis, and content of large bizarre glia. The large cells were confined to the original tumor bed and were consistent with neoplastic cells inactivated and immobilized by radio- and chemotherapy. These lesions were accurately localized by CT scanning. The recurrent lesions were heterogeneous, but most were formed of widely disseminated small anaplastic cells. The highly cellular regions of such lesions could be localized by CT scanning, but CT could not detect less cellular foci in the cerebrum, cerebellum, or brain stem. In one patient, the contrast-enhancing lesions of “recurrence,” were foci of radionecrosis, underscoring the difficulty in distinguishing this entity from recurrent neoplasm.

17 November 2016 in Acta Neuropathologica
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Kristian W. PajtlerKristian W. Pajtler
Kristian W. Pajtler
SMStephen C. Mack
Stephen C. Mack
Vijay RamaswamyVijay Ramaswamy
Vijay Ramaswamy
CSChristian A. Smith
Christian A. Smith
HWHendrik Witt
Hendrik Witt
MTMichael D. Taylor
Michael D. Taylor
Multiple independent genomic profiling efforts have recently identified clinically and molecularly distinct subgroups of ependymoma arising from all three anatomic compartments of the central nervous system (supratentorial brain, posterior fossa, and spinal cord). These advances motivated a consensus meeting to discuss: (1) the utility of current histologic grading criteria, (2) the integration of molecular-based stratification schemes in future clinical trials for patients with ependymoma and (3) current therapy in the context of molecular subgroups. Discussion at the meeting generated a series of consensus statements and recommendations from the attendees, which comment on the prognostic evaluation and treatment decisions of patients with intracranial ependymoma (WHO Grade II/III) based on the knowledge of its molecular subgroups. The major consensus among attendees was reached that treatment decisions for ependymoma (outside of clinical trials) should not be based on grading (II vs III). Supratentorial and posterior fossa ependymomas are distinct diseases, although the impact on therapy is still evolving. Molecular subgrouping should be part of all clinical trials henceforth.

20 November 2010 in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SRStefan Rutkowski
Stefan Rutkowski
KHKatja von Hoff
Katja von Hoff
AEAngela Emser
Angela Emser
IZIsabella Zwiener
Isabella Zwiener
TPTorsten Pietsch
Torsten Pietsch
JGJacques Grill
Jacques Grill
Purpose: To assess the prognostic role of clinical parameters and histology in early childhood medulloblastoma. Patients and Methods: Clinical and histologic data from 270 children younger than age 5 years diagnosed with medulloblastoma between March 1987 and July 2004 and treated within prospective trials of five national study groups were centrally analyzed. Results: Two hundred sixty children with medulloblastoma and specified histologic subtype were eligible for analysis (median age, 1.89 years; median follow-up, 8.0 years). Rates for 8-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 55% and 76%, respectively, in 108 children with desmoplastic/nodular medulloblastoma (DNMB) or medulloblastoma with extensive nodularity (MBEN); 27% and 42%, respectively, in 145 children with classic medulloblastoma (CMB); and 14% and 14%, respectively, in seven children with large-cell/anaplastic (LC/A) medulloblastoma (P < .001). Histology (DNMB/MBEN: hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.64; LC/A medulloblastoma: HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 0.95 to 5.54; P < .001 compared with CMB), incomplete resection and metastases (M0R1: HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.80; M+: HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.50 to 3.46; P < .001 compared with M0R0), and national group were independent prognostic factors for EFS, and OS. The HRs for OS ranged from 0.14 for localized M0 and DNMB/MBEN to 13.67 for metastatic LC/A medulloblastoma in different national groups. Conclusion: Our results confirm the high frequency of desmoplastic variants of medulloblastomas in early childhood and histopathology as a strong independent prognostic factor. A controlled de-escalation of treatment may be appropriate for young children with DNMB and MBEN in future clinical trials.