Peter Pivonka

Prof. Dr. Peter Pivonka


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 May 2017 in Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CBClaudia Di Bella
Claudia Di Bella
SDSerena Duchi
Serena Duchi
COCathal D. O'Connell
Cathal D. O'Connell
RBRomane Blanchard
Romane Blanchard
CACheryl Augustine
Cheryl Augustine
Peter ChoongPeter Choong
Peter Choong

1 August 2008 in Bone
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PPPeter Pivonka
Peter Pivonka
JZJan Zimak
Jan Zimak
DSDavid W. Smith
David W. Smith
BGBruce S. Gardiner
Bruce S. Gardiner
CDColin Dunstan
Colin Dunstan
GMGregory R. Mundy
Gregory R. Mundy

19 July 2017 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDSerena Duchi
Serena Duchi
OCOnofrillo Carmine
Onofrillo Carmine
COCathal D. O’connell
Cathal D. O’connell
RBRomane Blanchard
Romane Blanchard
CACheryl Augustine
Cheryl Augustine
Peter ChoongPeter Choong
Peter Choong
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is driving major innovations in the area of cartilage tissue engineering. Extrusion-based 3D bioprinting necessitates a phase change from a liquid bioink to a semi-solid crosslinked network achieved by a photo-initiated free radical polymerization reaction that is known to be cytotoxic. Therefore, the choice of the photocuring conditions has to be carefully addressed to generate a structure stiff enough to withstand the forces phisiologically applied on articular cartilage, while ensuring adequate cell survival for functional chondral repair. We recently developed a handheld 3D printer called “Biopen”. To progress towards translating this freeform biofabrication tool into clinical practice, we aimed to define the ideal bioprinting conditions that would deliver a scaffold with high cell viability and structural stiffness relevant for chondral repair. To fulfill those criteria, free radical cytotoxicity was confined by a co-axial Core/Shell separation. This system allowed the generation of Core/Shell GelMa/HAMa bioscaffolds with stiffness of 200KPa, achieved after only 10 seconds of exposure to 700 mW/cm2 of 365 nm UV-A, containing >90% viable stem cells that retained proliferative capacity. Overall, the Core/Shell handheld 3D bioprinting strategy enabled rapid generation of high modulus bioscaffolds with high cell viability, with potential for in situ surgical cartilage engineering.

1 February 2013 in Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSStefan Scheiner
Stefan Scheiner
PPPeter Pivonka
Peter Pivonka
CHChristian Hellmich
Christian Hellmich

1 January 2010 in Journal of Theoretical Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PPPeter Pivonka
Peter Pivonka
JZJan Zimak
Jan Zimak
DSDavid W. Smith
David W. Smith
BGBruce S. Gardiner
Bruce S. Gardiner
CDColin Dunstan
Colin Dunstan
GMGregory R. Mundy
Gregory R. Mundy

1 February 2013 in Engineering Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PPPeter Pivonka
Peter Pivonka
PBPascal R. Buenzli
Pascal R. Buenzli
SSStefan Scheiner
Stefan Scheiner
CHChristian Hellmich
Christian Hellmich
CDColin Dunstan
Colin Dunstan