So Yeon Won

So Yeon Won

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2020 in Korean Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWSo Yeon Won
So Yeon Won
YPYaewon Park
Yaewon Park
MPMina Park
Mina Park
SASung Soo Ahn
Sung Soo Ahn
JKJinna Kim
Jinna Kim
SLSeung-Koo Lee
Seung-Koo Lee
Objective: To evaluate radiomics analysis in studies on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) using a radiomics quality score (RQS) system to establish a roadmap for further improvement in clinical use. Materials and Methods: PubMed MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched using the terms 'cognitive impairment' or 'Alzheimer' or 'dementia' and 'radiomic' or 'texture' or 'radiogenomic' for articles published until March 2020. From 258 articles, 26 relevant original research articles were selected. Two neuroradiologists assessed the quality of the methodology according to the RQS. Adherence rates for the following six key domains were evaluated: image protocol and reproducibility, feature reduction and validation, biologic/clinical utility, performance index, high level of evidence, and open science. Results: The hippocampus was the most frequently analyzed (46.2%) anatomical structure. Of the 26 studies, 16 (61.5%) used an open source database (14 from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and 2 from Open Access Series of Imaging Studies). The mean RQS was 3.6 out of 36 (9.9%), and the basic adherence rate was 27.6%. Only one study (3.8%) performed external validation. The adherence rate was relatively high for reporting the imaging protocol (96.2%), multiple segmentation (76.9%), discrimination statistics (69.2%), and open science and data (65.4%) but low for conducting test-retest analysis (7.7%) and biologic correlation (3.8%). None of the studies stated potential clinical utility, conducted a phantom study, performed cut-off analysis or calibration statistics, was a prospective study, or conducted cost-effectiveness analysis, resulting in a low level of evidence. Conclusion: The quality of radiomics reporting in MCI and AD studies is suboptimal. Validation is necessary using external dataset, and improvements need to be made to feature reproducibility, feature selection, clinical utility, model performance index, and pursuits of a higher level of evidence.

12 August 2021 in American Journal of Neuroradiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BSBeomseok Sohn
Beomseok Sohn
KPK.-Y. Park
K.-Y. Park
JCJ. Choi
J. Choi
JKJ.H. Koo
J.H. Koo
KHKyunghwa Han
Kyunghwa Han
SLS.-K. Lee
S.-K. Lee
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The detection of cerebral aneurysms on MRA is a challenging task. Recent studies have used deep learning–based software for automated detection of aneurysms on MRA and have reported high performance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incremental value of using deep learning–based software for the detection of aneurysms on MRA by 2 radiologists, a neurosurgeon, and a neurologist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TOF-MRA examinations of intracranial aneurysms were retrospectively extracted. Four physicians interpreted the MRA blindly. After a washout period, they interpreted MRA again using the software. Sensitivity and specificity per patient, sensitivity per lesion, and the number of false-positives per case were measured. Diagnostic performances, including subgroup analysis of lesions, were compared. Logistic regression with a generalized estimating equation was used. RESULTS: A total of 332 patients were evaluated; 135 patients had positive findings with 169 lesions. With software assistance, patient-based sensitivity was statistically improved after the washout period (73.5% versus 86.5%, P < .001). The neurosurgeon and neurologist showed a significant increase in patient-based sensitivity with software assistance (74.8% versus 85.2%, P = .03, and 56.3% versus 84.4%, P < .001, respectively), while the number of false-positive cases did not increase significantly (23 versus 30, P = .20, and 22 versus 24, P = .75, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Software-aided reading showed significant incremental value in the sensitivity of clinicians in the detection of aneurysms on MRA without a significant increase in false-positive findings, especially for the neurosurgeon and neurologist. Software-aided reading showed equivocal value for the radiologist.

1 May 2021 in European Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SWSo Yeon Won
So Yeon Won
YPYaewon Park
Yaewon Park
SASung Soo Ahn
Sung Soo Ahn
JMJu Hyung Moon
Ju Hyung Moon
Eui Hyun KimEui Hyun Kim
Eui Hyun Kim
SLSeung-Koo Lee
Seung-Koo Lee

1 January 2021 in Yonsei Medical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BJBio Joo
Bio Joo
HCHyun Seok Choi
Hyun Seok Choi
SASung Soo Ahn
Sung Soo Ahn
JCJihoon Cha
Jihoon Cha
SWSo Yeon Won
So Yeon Won
SLSeung-Koo Lee
Seung-Koo Lee
Joo B, et al. Yonsei Med J. 2021 Nov;62(11):1052-1061. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2021.62.11.1052

1 January 2022 in Korean Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWSo Yeon Won
So Yeon Won
JCJihoon Cha
Jihoon Cha
HCHyun Seok Choi
Hyun Seok Choi
YKYoung Dae Kim
Young Dae Kim
HYO SUK NAMHYO SUK NAM
HYO SUK NAM
SLSeung-Koo Lee
Seung-Koo Lee
Won SY, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2022 Mar;23(3):333-342. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0615

1 January 2023 in Korean Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BJBio Joo
Bio Joo
SWSo Yeon Won
So Yeon Won
RSRalph Sinkus
Ralph Sinkus
SLSeung-Koo Lee
Seung-Koo Lee
Joo B, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2023 Jun;24(6):564-573. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2022.0992