Anupreet Kaur

Anupreet Kaur


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ZSZeeshan Sheikh
Zeeshan Sheikh
VNVasudev Vivekanand Nayak
Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak
Umer DaoodUmer Daood
Umer Daood
AKAnupreet Kaur
Anupreet Kaur
HMHanan Moussa
Hanan Moussa
Lukasz WitekLukasz Witek
Lukasz Witek
Three-dimensional printing (3DP) technology has revolutionized the field of the use of bioceramics for maxillofacial and periodontal applications, offering unprecedented control over the shape, size, and structure of bioceramic implants. In addition, bioceramics have become attractive materials for these applications due to their biocompatibility, biostability, and favorable mechanical properties. However, despite their advantages, bioceramic implants are still associated with inferior biological performance issues after implantation, such as slow osseointegration, inadequate tissue response, and an increased risk of implant failure. To address these challenges, researchers have been developing strategies to improve the biological performance of 3D-printed bioceramic implants. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of 3DP techniques and strategies for bioceramic materials designed for bone regeneration. The review also addresses the use and incorporation of active biomolecules in 3D-printed bioceramic constructs to stimulate bone regeneration. By controlling the surface roughness and chemical composition of the implant, the construct can be tailored to promote osseointegration and reduce the risk of adverse tissue reactions. Additionally, growth factors, such as bone morphogenic proteins (rhBMP-2) and pharmacologic agent (dipyridamole), can be incorporated to promote the growth of new bone tissue. Incorporating porosity into bioceramic constructs can improve bone tissue formation and the overall biological response of the implant. As such, employing surface modification, combining with other materials, and incorporating the 3DP workflow can lead to better patient healing outcomes.

29 November 2023 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
ZSZeeshan Sheikh
Zeeshan Sheikh
VNVasudev Vivekanand Nayak
Vasudev Vivekanand Nayak
Umer DaoodUmer Daood
Umer Daood
AKAnupreet Kaur
Anupreet Kaur
HMHanan Moussa
Hanan Moussa
Lukasz WitekLukasz Witek
Lukasz Witek
3D Printing (3DP) technology has revolutionized the field of the use of bioceramics for maxillofacial and periodontal applications, offering unprecedented control over the shape, size, and structure of bioceramic implants. In addition, bioceramics have become attractive materials for these applications due to their biocompatibility, biostability, and favorable mechanical properties. However, despite their advantages, bioceramic implants are still associated with inferior biological performance issues after implantation, such as slow osseointegration, inadequate tissue response, and increased risk of implant failure. To address these challenges, researchers have been developing strategies to improve the biological performance of 3D printed bioceramic implants. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of 3DP techniques and strategies for bioceramic materials designed for bone regeneration. The review also addresses the use and incorporation of active biomolecules in 3D printed bioceramic constructs to stimulate bone regeneration. By controlling the surface roughness, and chemical composition of the implant, the construct can be tailored to promote osseointegration and reduce the risk of adverse tissue reactions. Additionally, growth factors, such as bone morphogenic proteins (rhBMP-2) and pharmacologic agent (dipyridamole), can be incorporated to promote the growth of new bone tissue. Incorporating porosity into bioceramic constructs can improve bone tissue formation and the overall biological response of the implant. As such, by employing surface modification, combining with other materials, and incorporation of 3DP workflow can lead to better patient healing outcomes.