Mohammad Hassan Emamian

Prof. Mohammad Hassan Emamian

Ophthalmic Epidemiology research Center, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shāhrūd, Semnān, Iran
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2019 in JAMA Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGlobal Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration
Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration
CFChristina Fitzmaurice
Christina Fitzmaurice
DADegu Abate
Degu Abate
NANaghmeh Abbasi
Naghmeh Abbasi
HAHedayat Abbastabar
Hedayat Abbastabar
CMChristopher J. L. Murray
Christopher J. L. Murray
Cancer is now widely recognized as a global problem that unfortunately lacks a global solution. The latest United Nations high-level meeting on noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) exemplified this conundrum.1 Despite global commitment to reducing the risk of and disability from NCDs, including cancer, implementation of known solutions is inadequate to reach the 2011 Political Declaration on the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases2,3 (25% reduction in premature mortality from NCDs by 2025) and the third Sustainable Development Goal (by 2030 reduce by one-third premature mortality from NCDs through prevention and treatment, and promote mental health and well-being).4 To reduce cancer burden, identifying the scope of the problem and mapping out implementation of solutions is best done in National Cancer Control Plans (NCCPs). However, a recent review showed that only 29% of low-income countries had a NCCP, and even if NCCPs existed, cost, financing, monitoring, and expansion of information systems was often inadequate. Many highly effective prevention and treatment strategies exist for cancer. However, they are often very specific (eg, vaccination for human papillomavirus and hepatitis B virus for prevention of cervical and liver cancer, or tyrosine kinase inhibitors for cancers with targetable mutations). Effective NCCPs therefore require detailed knowledge about the local burden of cancer and associated risk factors. We herein present results from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 study describing cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost (YLLs), years lived with disability (YLDs), and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 195 countries from 1990 through 2017, which can inform cancer control through policy, resource allocation, and health system planning.

1 December 2019 in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSaeid Safiri
Saeid Safiri
SSSadaf G Sepanlou
Sadaf G Sepanlou
KIKevin S Ikuta
Kevin S Ikuta
CBCatherine Bisignano
Catherine Bisignano
HSHamideh Salimzadeh
Hamideh Salimzadeh
RMReza Malekzadeh
Reza Malekzadeh
Data about the global, regional, and country-specific variations in the levels and trends of colorectal cancer are required to understand the impact of this disease and the trends in its burden to help policy makers allocate resources. Here we provide a status report on the incidence, mortality, and disability caused by colorectal cancer in 195 countries and territories between 1990 and 2017. Vital registration, sample vital registration, verbal autopsy, and cancer registry data were used to generate incidence, death, and disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) estimates of colorectal cancer at the global, regional, and national levels. We also determined the association between development levels and colorectal cancer age-standardised DALY rates, and calculated DALYs attributable to risk factors that had evidence of causation with colorectal cancer. All of the estimates are reported as counts and age-standardised rates per 100 000 person-years, with some estimates also presented by sex and 5-year age groups. In 2017, there were 1·8 million (95% UI 1·8-1·9) incident cases of colorectal cancer globally, with an age-standardised incidence rate of 23·2 (22·7-23·7) per 100 000 person-years that increased by 9·5% (4·5-13·5) between 1990 and 2017. Globally, colorectal cancer accounted for 896 000 (876 300-915 700) deaths in 2017, with an age-standardised death rate of 11·5 (11·3-11·8) per 100 000 person-years, which decreased between 1990 and 2017 (-13·5% [-18·4 to -10·0]). Colorectal cancer was also responsible for 19·0 million (18·5-19·5) DALYs globally in 2017, with an age-standardised rate of 235·7 (229·7-242·0) DALYs per 100 000 person-years, which decreased between 1990 and 2017 (-14·5% [-20·4 to -10·3]). Slovakia, the Netherlands, and New Zealand had the highest age-standardised incidence rates in 2017. Greenland, Hungary, and Slovakia had the highest age-standardised death rates in 2017. Numbers of incident cases and deaths were higher among males than females up to the ages of 80-84 years, with the highest rates observed in the oldest age group (≥95 years) for both sexes in 2017. There was a non-linear association between the Socio-demographic Index and the Healthcare Access and Quality Index and age-standardised DALY rates. In 2017, the three largest contributors to DALYs at the global level, for both sexes, were diet low in calcium (20·5% [12·9-28·9]), alcohol use (15·2% [12·1-18·3]), and diet low in milk (14·3% [5·1-24·8]). There is substantial global variation in the burden of colorectal cancer. Although the overall colorectal cancer age-standardised death rate has been decreasing at the global level, the increasing age-standardised incidence rate in most countries poses a major public health challenge across the world. The results of this study could be useful for policy makers to carry out cost-effective interventions and to reduce exposure to modifiable risk factors, particularly in countries with high incidence or increasing burden. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

1 September 2019 in The Lancet Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LFLisa M. Force
Lisa M. Force
IAIbrahim Abdollahpour
Ibrahim Abdollahpour
SAShailesh M Advani
Shailesh M Advani
DADominic Agius
Dominic Agius
EAElham Ahmadian
Elham Ahmadian
NBNickhill Bhakta
Nickhill Bhakta
Accurate childhood cancer burden data are crucial for resource planning and health policy prioritisation. Model-based estimates are necessary because cancer surveillance data are scarce or non-existent in many countries. Although global incidence and mortality estimates are available, there are no previous analyses of the global burden of childhood cancer represented in disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). Using the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017 methodology, childhood (ages 0-19 years) cancer mortality was estimated by use of vital registration system data, verbal autopsy data, and population-based cancer registry incidence data, which were transformed to mortality estimates through modelled mortality-to-incidence ratios (MIRs). Childhood cancer incidence was estimated using the mortality estimates and corresponding MIRs. Prevalence estimates were calculated by using MIR to model survival and multiplied by disability weights to obtain years lived with disability (YLDs). Years of life lost (YLLs) were calculated by multiplying age-specific cancer deaths by the difference between the age of death and a reference life expectancy. DALYs were calculated as the sum of YLLs and YLDs. Final point estimates are reported with 95% uncertainty intervals. Globally, in 2017, there were 11·5 million (95% uncertainty interval 10·6-12·3) DALYs due to childhood cancer, 97·3% (97·3-97·3) of which were attributable to YLLs and 2·7% (2·7-2·7) of which were attributable to YLDs. Childhood cancer was the sixth leading cause of total cancer burden globally and the ninth leading cause of childhood disease burden globally. 82·2% (82·1-82·2) of global childhood cancer DALYs occurred in low, low-middle, or middle Socio-demographic Index locations, whereas 50·3% (50·3-50·3) of adult cancer DALYs occurred in these same locations. Cancers that are uncategorised in the current GBD framework comprised 26·5% (26·5-26·5) of global childhood cancer DALYs. The GBD 2017 results call attention to the substantial burden of childhood cancer globally, which disproportionately affects populations in resource-limited settings. The use of DALY-based estimates is crucial in demonstrating that childhood cancer burden represents an important global cancer and child health concern. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC), and St. Baldrick's Foundation.

16 October 2019 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRoy Burstein
Roy Burstein
NHNathaniel J Henry
Nathaniel J Henry
MCMichael L Collison
Michael L Collison
LMLaurie B Marczak
Laurie B Marczak
ASAmber Sligar
Amber Sligar
SHSimon Hay
Simon Hay
Since 2000, many countries have achieved considerable success in improving child survival, but localized progress remains unclear. To inform efforts towards United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3.2—to end preventable child deaths by 2030—we need consistently estimated data at the subnational level regarding child mortality rates and trends. Here we quantified, for the period 2000–2017, the subnational variation in mortality rates and number of deaths of neonates, infants and children under 5 years of age within 99 low- and middle-income countries using a geostatistical survival model. We estimated that 32% of children under 5 in these countries lived in districts that had attained rates of 25 or fewer child deaths per 1,000 live births by 2017, and that 58% of child deaths between 2000 and 2017 in these countries could have been averted in the absence of geographical inequality. This study enables the identification of high-mortality clusters, patterns of progress and geographical inequalities to inform appropriate investments and implementations that will help to improve the health of all populations.

8 August 2013 in Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HHHassan Hashemi
Hassan Hashemi
MKMahdi Khabazkhoob
Mahdi Khabazkhoob
AKAhmad Kheirkhah
Ahmad Kheirkhah
Mohammad Hassan EmamianMohammad Hassan Emamian
Mohammad Hassan Emamian
Shiva MehravaranShiva Mehravaran
Shiva Mehravaran
AFAkbar Fotouhi
Akbar Fotouhi

1 November 2013 in Cornea
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HHHassan Hashemi
Hassan Hashemi
ABAsghar Msc Beiranvand
Asghar Msc Beiranvand
MKMahdi Khabazkhoob
Mahdi Khabazkhoob
SASoheila Msc Asgari
Soheila Msc Asgari
Mohammad Hassan EmamianMohammad Hassan Emamian
Mohammad Hassan Emamian
AFAkbar Fotouhi
Akbar Fotouhi
Purpose: To determine the prevalence of keratoconus in the 40- to 64-year-old population of Shahroud, Iran. Methods: This study was done cross sectionally based on the data from the first phase of the Shahroud Eye Cohort Study. In this study, 6311 patients were selected using random cluster sampling, and 5190 patients (response rate = 82.2%) participated in the study. Here, the analysis was done on data pertaining to those whose topographic map (with Pentacam) had no errors. These patients were categorized as keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and non-keratoconus. Results: After applying the exclusion criteria, data from 4592 patients with a mean age of 50.83 ± 0.12 years were analyzed. Of these, 35 patients (0.76%) were diagnosed with keratoconus in at least 1 eye, and 47 patients (1.02%) were identified as having forme fruste keratoconus. The prevalence of keratoconus was 0.72% (95% confidence interval, 0.35–1.09) in men, and 0.79% (95% confidence interval, 0.43–1.15) in women (P = 0.793). The mean age of the keratoconic patients was 47.6, which was significantly lower than 50.9 of normal individuals (P < 0.001). The mean maximum keratometry and central corneal thickness in patients with keratoconus were 48.67 ± 3.6 diopters and 470 ± 29 μm, respectively. Keratoconus was associated with an 8.1 greater odds of visual impairment (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The prevalence of keratoconus in the Shahroud population is far higher than in western populations. Because of the high odds of visual impairment in this population, it can be a serious warning for the need to assess the prevalence and causes of keratoconus in the Middle Eastern region.