Chad Babcock

Dr. Chad Babcock


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2018 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChad Babcock
Chad Babcock
AFAndrew Finley
Andrew Finley
HAHans-Erik Andersen
Hans-Erik Andersen
RPRobert Pattison
Robert Pattison
BCBruce D. Cook
Bruce D. Cook
ENErik Næsset
Erik Næsset

25 January 2024 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ASAnthony J. Stewart
Anthony J. Stewart
MHMeghan Halabisky
Meghan Halabisky
CBChad Babcock
Chad Babcock
DBDavid Butman
David Butman
DDDavid V. D’aMore
David V. D’aMore
L. Monika MoskalL. Monika Moskal
L. Monika Moskal
Inland wetlands are critical carbon reservoirs storing 30% of global soil organic carbon (SOC) within 6% of the land surface. However, forested regions contain SOC-rich wetlands that are not included in current maps, which we refer to as ‘cryptic carbon’. Here, to demonstrate the magnitude and distribution of cryptic carbon, we measure and map SOC stocks as a function of a continuous, upland-to-wetland gradient across the Hoh River Watershed (HRW) in the Pacific Northwest of the U.S., comprising 68,145 ha. Total catchment SOC at 30 cm depth (5.0 TgC) is between estimates from global SOC maps (GSOC: 3.9 TgC; SoilGrids: 7.8 TgC). For wetland SOC, our 1 m stock estimates are substantially higher (Mean: 259 MgC ha−1; Total: 1.7 TgC) compared to current wetland-specific SOC maps derived from a combination of U.S. national datasets (Mean: 184 MgC ha−1; Total: 0.3 TgC). We show that total unmapped or cryptic carbon is 1.5 TgC and when added to current estimates, increases the estimated wetland SOC stock to 1.8 TgC or by 482%, which highlights the vast stores of SOC that are not mapped and contained in unprotected and vulnerable wetlands.

1 January 2019 in Statistica Sinica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DTDaniel Taylor-Rodriguez
Daniel Taylor-Rodriguez
AFAndrew Finley
Andrew Finley
ADAbhirup Datta
Abhirup Datta
CBChad Babcock
Chad Babcock
HAHans-Erik Andersen
Hans-Erik Andersen
SBSudipto Banerjee
Sudipto Banerjee
Gathering information about forest variables is an expensive and arduous activity. As such, directly collecting the data required to produce high-resolution maps over large spatial domains is infeasible. Next generation collection initiatives of remotely sensed Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data are specifically aimed at producing complete-coverage maps over large spatial domains. Given that LiDAR data and forest characteristics are often strongly correlated, it is possible to make use of the former to model, predict, and map forest variables over regions of interest. This entails dealing with the high-dimensional (~102) spatially dependent LiDAR outcomes over a large number of locations (~105–106). With this in mind, we develop the Spatial Factor Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Process (SF-NNGP) model, and embed it in a two-stage approach that connects the spatial structure found in LiDAR signals with forest variables. We provide a simulation experiment that demonstrates inferential and predictive performance of the SF-NNGP, and use the two-stage modeling strategy to generate complete-coverage maps of forest variables with associated uncertainty over a large region of boreal forests in interior Alaska.

1 September 2016 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChad Babcock
Chad Babcock
AFAndrew O. Finley
Andrew O. Finley
BCBruce D. Cook
Bruce D. Cook
AWAaron Weiskittel
Aaron Weiskittel
CWChristopher W. Woodall
Christopher W. Woodall

1 November 2015 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBChad Babcock
Chad Babcock
AFAndrew O. Finley
Andrew O. Finley
JBJohn B. Bradford
John B. Bradford
RKRandall Kolka
Randall Kolka
RBRichard Birdsey
Richard Birdsey
MRMichael G. Ryan
Michael G. Ryan

22 June 2023 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EEEthan Emick
Ethan Emick
CBChad Babcock
Chad Babcock
GWGrayson W. White
Grayson W. White
Andrew T. HudakAndrew T. Hudak
Andrew T. Hudak
GGrant M. Domke
Grant M. Domke
AFAndrew Finley
Andrew Finley