Jing Che

Prof. Jing Che


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJin-Min Chen
Jin-Min Chen
WZWei-Wei Zhou
Wei-Wei Zhou
NPNikolay A. Poyarkov
Nikolay A. Poyarkov
BSBryan L. Stuart
Bryan L. Stuart
RBRafe M. Brown
Rafe M. Brown
JCJing Che
Jing Che

1 July 2018 in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJin-Min Chen
Jin-Min Chen
NPNikolay A. Poyarkov
Nikolay A. Poyarkov
CSChatmongkon Suwannapoom
Chatmongkon Suwannapoom
ALAmy Lathrop
Amy Lathrop
YWYun-He Wu
Yun-He Wu
JCJing Che
Jing Che

2 March 2015 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YSYan-Bo Sun
Yan-Bo Sun
ZXZi-Jun Xiong
Zi-Jun Xiong
XXXue-Yan Xiang
Xue-Yan Xiang
SLShiping Liu
Shiping Liu
WZWei-Wei Zhou
Wei-Wei Zhou
YZYa-Ping Zhang
Ya-Ping Zhang
Significance: We provide a de novo genome of the Tibetan frog, Nanorana parkeri , and conduct a series of comparisons with other vertebrates. Approximately one-half of the genome of Nanorana consists of transposable elements (TEs). The frequencies and distributional patterns of TEs differ considerably between Nanorana and Xenopus , the only other amphibian for which a genome has been sequenced. The genomes of these two frogs exhibit substantial homologous synteny blocks with rare interchromosomal and intrachromosomal rearrangements. We also identify 11 Mb of amphibian-specific conserved elements comprising 217 genes. These highly conserved genes provide a basis for comparative genomic analyses throughout frogs.

21 October 2020 in National Science Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WXWei Xu
Wei Xu
WDWen-Jie Dong
Wen-Jie Dong
TFTing-Ting Fu
Ting-Ting Fu
WGWei Gao
Wei Gao
CLChen-Qi Lu
Chen-Qi Lu
JCJing Che
Jing Che
The Himalaya are among the youngest and highest mountains in the world, but the exact timing of their uplift and origins of their biodiversity are still in debate. The Himalayan region is a relatively small area but with exceptional diversity and endemism. One common hypothesis to explain the rich montane diversity is uplift-driven diversification—that orogeny creates conditions favoring rapid in situ speciation of resident lineages. We test this hypothesis in the Himalayan region using amphibians and reptiles, two environmentally sensitive vertebrate groups. In addition, analysis of diversification of the herpetofauna provides an independent source of information to test competing geological hypotheses of Himalayan orogenesis. We conclude that the origins of the Himalayan herpetofauna date to the early Paleocene, but that diversification of most groups was concentrated in the Miocene. There was an increase in both rates and modes of diversification during the early to middle Miocene, together with regional interchange (dispersal) between the Himalaya and adjacent regions. Our analyses support a recently proposed stepwise geological model of Himalayan uplift beginning in the Paleocene, with a subsequent rapid increase of uplifting during the Miocene, finally giving rise to the intensification of the modern South Asian Monsoon.

28 April 2021 in Diversity
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJesse Grismer
Jesse Grismer
PWPerry Wood
Perry Wood
NPNikolay A. Poyarkov
Nikolay A. Poyarkov
MLMinh Le
Minh Le
SKSuranjan Karunarathna
Suranjan Karunarathna
JGJesse Grismer
Jesse Grismer
Karstic landscapes are immense reservoirs of biodiversity and range-restricted endemism. Nowhere is this more evident than in the world’s third-largest vertebrate genus Cyrtodactylus (Gekkonidae) which contains well over 300 species. A stochastic character mapping analysis of 10 different habitat preferences across a phylogeny containing 344 described and undescribed species recovered a karst habitat preference occurring in 25.0% of the species, whereas that of the other eight specific habitat preferences occurred in only 0.2–11.0% of the species. The tenth category—general habitat preference—occurred in 38.7% of the species and was the ancestral habitat preference for Cyrtodactylus and the ultimate origin of all other habitat preferences. This study echoes the results of a previous study illustrating that karstic landscapes are generators of species diversity within Cyrtodactylus and not simply “imperiled arks of biodiversity” serving as refugia for relics. Unfortunately, the immense financial returns of mineral extraction to developing nations largely outweighs concerns for biodiversity conservation, leaving approximately 99% of karstic landscapes with no legal protection. This study continues to underscore the urgent need for their appropriate management and conservation. Additionally, this analysis supports the monophyly of the recently proposed 31 species groups and adds one additional species group.

1 May 2018 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FYFang Yan
Fang Yan
JLJingcai Lü
Jingcai Lü
BZBaolin Zhang
Baolin Zhang
ZYZhiyong Yuan
Zhiyong Yuan
HZHaipeng Zhao
Haipeng Zhao
JCJing Che
Jing Che