Malignant melanomas (MMs) are the abnormal proliferation of melanocytes and are one of the lethal skin cancers in humans, equines, and canines. Accordingly, MMs in companion animals can serve as naturally occurring animal models, completing conventional cancer models. The common constitutive activation of the MAPK and PI3K pathways in MMs has been described in all three species. Targeting the related pathways is considered a potential option in comparative oncologic approaches. Herein, we present a cross-species comparative analysis exposing a set of ten melanoma cell lines (one human, three equine, and six canine) derived from primary tumors or metastasis to a pan-RAF and RAF dimer inhibitor (LY3009120). Cellular response (proliferation, biomass, metabolism, early and late apoptosis/necrosis, and morphology) and the presence of pathogenic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) within the mutational hotspot genes BRAF exon 11 and 15, NRAS exon 2 and 3, KRAS exon 2, and KIT exon 11 were analyzed. This study showed that equine malignant melanoma (EMM) cells (MelDuWi) harbor the KRAS p.Q61H mutation, while canine malignant melanoma (CMM) cells (cRGO1 and cRGO1.2) carry NRAS p.G13R. Except for EMM metastasis cells eRGO6 (wild type of the above-mentioned hotspot genes), all melanoma cell lines exhibited a decrease in dose dependence after 48 and 72 h of exposure to LY3009120, independent of the mutation hotspot landscape. Furthermore, LY3009120 caused significant early apoptosis and late apoptosis/necrosis in all melanoma cell lines except for eRGO6. The anti-tumor effects of LY3009120 were observed in nine melanoma cell lines, indicating the potential feasibility of experimental trials with LY3009120. The present study reveals that the irradiation-resistant canine metastasis cells (cRGO1.2) harboring the NRAS p.G13R mutation are significantly LY3009120-sensitive, while the equine metastases-derived eRGO6 cells show significant resistance to LY3009120, which make them both valuable tools for studying resistance mechanisms in comparative oncology.

Next-generation sequencing is a vital tool for personalized diagnostics and therapies in cancer. Despite numerous advantages, the method depends on multiple parameters regarding the sample material, e.g., sample fixation. A panel’s ability to ensure balanced pre-amplification of the regions of interest is challenging, especially in targeted sequencing approaches, but of significant importance to its applicability across hematological malignancies and solid tumors. This study comparatively evaluated the technical performance of the commercially available Oncomine^TM Myeloid Panel in fresh and Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material by using an Ion Torrent™ Personal Genome Machine™ System and Ion GeneStudio S5 System platform. In total, 114 samples were analyzed, including 55 fresh materials and 59 FFPE samples. Samples were sequenced with a minimum of one million reads. Amplicons with coverage below 400 reads were classified as underperforming. In fresh material, 49/526 amplicons were identified as performing insufficiently, corresponding with 18 genes. Using FFPE material, 103/526 amplicons underperformed. Independent of input material, regions in 27 genes, including ASXL1, BCOR and BRAF, did not match quality parameters. Subsequently, exemplary mutations were extracted from the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer database. This technical evaluation of the Oncomine^TM Myeloid Panel identified amplicons that do not achieve adequate coverage levels and which need to be considered when interpreting sequencing.