Alastair D. Martin

Dr. Alastair D. Martin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 2017 in Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EAEDIDIONG ASUQUO
EDIDIONG ASUQUO
AMAlastair D. Martin
Alastair D. Martin
PNPetrus Nzerem
Petrus Nzerem
FSFlor Siperstein
Flor Siperstein
XFXiaolei Fan
Xiaolei Fan


1 July 2019 in Waste Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
HJHarish Kumar Jeswani
Harish Kumar Jeswani
AWAndrew Whiting
Andrew Whiting
AMAlastair D. Martin
Alastair D. Martin
AAAdisa Azapagic
Adisa Azapagic
This work aims to assess the environmental and economic sustainability of poultry litter gasification for heat and electricity generation. The results are compared with gasification of two other biomass feedstocks (Miscanthus and waste wood) and energy from fossil fuels. The findings suggest that poultry litter gasification can lead to significant reductions in 14 out of 16 impacts considered in the study in comparison with fossil-fuel alternatives. Compared to combined heat and power (CHP) from natural gas, most impacts from gasification of the litter are lower by more than 90%, including global warming potential. However, human toxicity and depletion of minerals are 25% and three times higher, respectively. Energy from poultry litter also has lower impacts than from waste woodchips and Miscanthus across all the categories, except for acidification. Owing to high capital costs, the unsubsidised cost of generating heat and electricity from poultry litter is similar to that of natural gas CHP but significantly cheaper than from other fossil-fuel alternatives. However, with the current subsidies in the UK, the payback time for poultry litter gasification is 13.5 years. It is estimated that 4.55 Mt of poultry litter is currently available in the UK, 2.73 Mt of which is suitable for conversion to energy. If this waste is utilised in gasification plants, it could potentially provide 0.6% of electricity and heat in the UK and save 1.7 Mt of GHG per year, equivalent to around 0.4% of UK's GHG emissions. However, the successful uptake of this technology will depend on a future reduction in capital costs.

1 November 2016 in Chemical Engineering Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DLDun Liu
Dun Liu
EREdward Roberts
Edward Roberts
AMAlastair D. Martin
Alastair D. Martin
SHStuart M. Holmes
Stuart M. Holmes
NBN.W. Brown
N.W. Brown
NHNatalia de las Heras
Natalia de las Heras

3 August 2018 in Chemengineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAEDIDIONG ASUQUO
EDIDIONG ASUQUO
AMAlastair D. Martin
Alastair D. Martin
PNPetrus Nzerem
Petrus Nzerem
An agricultural residue, white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) tuber peel (YTBS), was used for the removal of Cd(II) ion from an aqueous solution using a batch method. The adsorbent was characterized using FTIR, TGA, SEM, EDX, N2 BET, XRD, and XRF. The optimization of sorption variables such as pH, contact time, adsorbent dose, and initial metal ion concentration at 25 °C were also carried out. The results indicated the dependence of sorption on the adsorbate pH and adsorbent dose, while the adsorption system reached equilibrium in 180 min. The sorption kinetics was fitted to three models (pseudo first order, pseudo second order, and Elovich) to validate the kinetics, and the pseudo first order was the best model for the description of Cd(II) uptake. Equilibrium isotherm modelling was also carried out using the Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin models, with the Langmuir isotherm giving the best fitting to the experimental results. The maximum loading capacity (qmax) of the adsorbent for Cd(II) obtained from the Langmuir isotherm model was 22.4 mg∙g−1 with an isotherm constant (KL) of 3.46 × 10−3 L·mg−1 and r2 value of 0.99. This result indicates that the YTBS residue was a good adsorbent for the removal of Cd(II) ion from aqueous system.

1 September 2020 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SVSimon Vecten
Simon Vecten
MWM. Wilkinson
M. Wilkinson
AMAlastair D. Martin
Alastair D. Martin
ADAmos Christopher Dexter
Amos Christopher Dexter
NBNuno Bimbo
Nuno Bimbo
BHB. Herbert
B. Herbert