Cohesin is well known as the protein complex that holds sister chromatids together after replication so that they are not prematurely separated before mitosis. More recent data suggested that cohesin also has a cell-division-independent function, the loss of which can lead to disease. Matthias Merkenschlager and colleagues report that in mouse thymocytes, cohesin is required for long-range interactions that underlie several events leading to T-cell receptor rearrangement and thymocyte differentiation. Cohesin enables post-replicative DNA repair and chromosome segregation by holding sister chromatids together from the time of DNA replication in S phase until mitosis1. There is growing evidence that cohesin also forms long-range chromosomal cis-interactions2,3,4 and may regulate gene expression2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 in association with CTCF8,9, mediator4 or tissue-specific transcription factors10. Human cohesinopathies such as Cornelia de Lange syndrome are thought to result from impaired non-canonical cohesin functions7, but a clear distinction between the cell-division-related and cell-division-independent functions of cohesion—as exemplified in Drosophila11,12,13—has not been demonstrated in vertebrate systems. To address this, here we deleted the cohesin locus Rad21 in mouse thymocytes at a time in development when these cells stop cycling and rearrange their T-cell receptor (TCR) α locus (Tcra). Rad21-deficient thymocytes had a normal lifespan and retained the ability to differentiate, albeit with reduced efficiency. Loss of Rad21 led to defective chromatin architecture at the Tcra locus, where cohesion-binding sites flank the TEA promoter and the Eα enhancer, and demarcate Tcra from interspersed Tcrd elements and neighbouring housekeeping genes. Cohesin was required for long-range promoter–enhancer interactions, Tcra transcription, H3K4me3 histone modifications that recruit the recombination machinery14,15 and Tcra rearrangement. Provision of pre-rearranged TCR transgenes largely rescued thymocyte differentiation, demonstrating that among thousands of potential target genes across the genome4,8,9,10, defective Tcra rearrangement was limiting for the differentiation of cohesin-deficient thymocytes. These findings firmly establish a cell-division-independent role for cohesin in Tcra locus rearrangement and provide a comprehensive account of the mechanisms by which cohesin enables cellular differentiation in a well-characterized mammalian system.

The etiology of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has been shown to be associated with genetic and certain environmental factors that produce DNA damage. Base excision repair (BER) genes are responsible for repair of DNA damage caused by reactive oxygen species and other electrophiles and therefore are good candidate susceptibility genes for ESCC. We first screened eight BER genes for new and potential functional polymorphisms by resequencing 27 DNA samples. We then identified and genotyped for important tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a case-control study of 419 patients with newly diagnosed esophageal cancer and 480 healthy controls by frequency matching on age and sex. The association between genotypes and ESCC risk was estimated by unconditional multivariate logistic regression analysis, and stepwise regression procedure was used for constructing the final logistic regression model. We identified 129 SNPs in the eight BER genes, including 18 SNPs that cause amino acid changes. In the final model, 4 SNPs, including 2 in the coding regions (ADPRT Val762Ala and MBD4 Glu346Lys) and others in noncoding regions (LIG3 A3704G and XRCC1 T-77C), remained as significant predictors for the risk of ESCC. The adjusted odd ratios were 1.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.53] for the ADPRT 762Ala allele, 1.25 (95% CI 1.02–1.53) for the MBD4 346 Lys allele, 0.78 (95% CI 0.63–0.97) for the LIG3 3704G allele, and 1.38 (95% CI 1.01–1.89) for the XRCC1–77C allele. In addition, we observed a significant gene-gene interaction between XRCC1 Gln399Arg and ADPRT Val762Ala. The results suggest that the polymorphisms in five BER genes may be associated with the susceptibility to ESCC in a Chinese population.

Adenosine diphosphate ribosyl transferase (ADPRT) and X-ray repair cross-complementing 1 (XRCC1) are two major DNA base excision repair (BER) proteins and act interactively in stimulating and executing BER processes. Polymorphisms of ADPRT Val762Ala and XRCC1 Arg399Gln have been associated with altered protein function and BER activity. This case-control study examined the contribution of these two polymorphisms, alone and in combination, or in interaction with smoking, to the risk of developing lung cancer. We estimated the risk of lung cancer associated with these polymorphisms in 1,000 cases and 1,000 cancer-free controls using logistic regression models. Subjects having the ADPRT Ala/Ala genotype had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.68 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.27-2.23] compared with those having the Val/Val genotype. A greater than multiplicative joint effect between the ADPRT polymorphism and smoking was observed. The ORs (95% CI) of the Ala/Ala genotype for nonsmokers and smokers who smoked ≤16, 16 to 28, or >28 pack-years were 1.13 (0.79-1.62), 1.35 (0.68-2.70), 2.46 (1.35-4.51) or 17.09 (8.15-35.83), respectively (P trend test < 0.001). Gene-gene interaction of ADPRT and XRCC1 polymorphisms increased risk of lung cancer in a supermultiplicative manner (OR for the presence of both ADPRT 762Ala/Ala and XRCC1 399Gln/Gln genotypes, 5.91; 95% CI, 2.09-16.72), although the XRCC1 polymorphism itself was not associated with the risk. In conclusion, the ADPRT Val762Ala polymorphism plays an important role in smoking-related lung cancer and the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism may serve as a risk modifier.

X-ray repair cross-complementing 1 (XRCC1) plays a key role in DNA base excision repair and cells lacking its activity are hypersensitive to DNA damage. Recently, we reported a SNP (rs3213245, −77T>C) in the XRCC1 gene 5′ untranslated region (UTR) was significantly associated with the risk of developing esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Computer analysis predicted that this SNP was in the core of Sp1-binding motif, which suggested its functional significance. Gel shift and super shift assays confirmed that −77T>C polymorphic site in the XRCC1 promoter was within the Sp1-binding motif and the T>C substitution greatly enhanced the binding affinity of Sp1 to this region. Luciferase assays indicated that the Sp1-high-affinity C-allelic XRCC1 promoter was associated with a reduced transcriptional activity. The association between −77T>C and three other amino-acid substitution-causing polymorphisms in XRCC1 and risk of lung cancer was examined in 1024 patients and 1118 controls and the results showed that only the −77T>C polymorphism was significantly associated with an increased risk of developing lung cancer. Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that an increased risk of lung cancer was associated with the variant XRCC1 −77 genotypes (TC and CC) compared with the TT genotype (OR=1.46, 95% CI=1.18–1.82; P=0.001) and the increased risk was more pronounced in smokers (OR=1.63, 95% CI=1.20–2.21) than in non-smokers (OR=1.28, 95% CI=0.94–1.76). Taken together, these results showed that the functional SNP −77T>C in XRCC1 5′UTR was associated with cancer development owing to the decreased transcriptional activity of C-allele-containing promoter with higher affinity to Sp1 binding.

V(D)J recombination assembles antigen receptor genes in a well-defined order during lymphocyte development. This sequential process has long been understood in the context of the accessibility model, which states that V(D)J recombination is regulated by controlling the ability of the recombination machinery to gain access to its chromosomal substrates. Indeed, many features of “open” chromatin correlate with V(D)J recombination, and promoters and enhancers have been strongly implicated in creating a recombinase-accessible configuration in neighboring chromatin. An important prediction of the accessibility model is that cis-elements and transcription control binding of the recombination-activating gene 1 (RAG1) and RAG2 proteins to their DNA targets. However, this prediction has not been tested directly. In this study, we use mutant Tcra and Tcrb alleles to demonstrate that enhancers control RAG1 binding globally at Jα or Dβ/Jβ gene segments, that promoters and transcription direct RAG1 binding locally, and that RAG1 binding can be targeted in the absence of RAG2. These findings reveal important features of the genetic mechanisms that regulate RAG binding and provide a direct confirmation of the accessibility model.