Exertional heatstroke, brought on by strenuous activity, is usually seen in young, active people; classic heatstroke, associated with heat waves, is more common in the elderly and may be epidemic. Cooling and fluids are keys to management; sometimes, intensive care is needed.
Military Medicine is AMSUS’ monthly peer-reviewed journal, with articles including scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. Its objective is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare.
In a series of three companion papers published in this Journal, we identify and validate the available thermal stress indicators (TSIs). In this first paper of the series, we conducted a systematic review (registration: INPLASY202090088) to identify all TSIs and provide reliable information regarding their use (funded by EU Horizon 2020; HEAT-SHIELD). Eight databases (PubMed, Agricultural and Environmental Science Collection, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Russian Science Citation Index, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar) were searched from database inception to 15 April 2020. No restrictions on language or study design were applied. Of the 879 publications identified, 232 records were considered for further analysis. This search identified 340 instruments and indicators developed between 200 BC and 2019 AD. Of these, 153 are nomograms, instruments, and/or require detailed non-meteorological information, while 187 can be mathematically calculated utilizing only meteorological data. Of these meteorology-based TSIs, 127 were developed for people who are physically active, and 61 of those are eligible for use in occupational settings. Information regarding the equation, operating range, interpretation categories, required input data, as well as a free software to calculate all 187 meteorology-based TSIs is provided. The information presented in this systematic review should be adopted by those interested in performing on-site monitoring and/or big data analytics for climate services to ensure appropriate use of the meteorology-based TSIs. Studies two and three in this series of companion papers present guidance on the application and validation of these TSIs, to guide end users of these indicators for more effective use.
Risk of exertional heat stroke (EHS) is an ongoing challenge for United States military personnel, for athletes and for individuals with occupational stressors that involve prolonged activity in hot environments. Higher body mass index (BMI) is significantly associated with increased risk for EHS in activity duty U.S. Soldiers. During exercise, heat is generated primarily by contracting skeletal muscle (and other metabolically active body mass) and dissipated based on body surface area (BSA). Thus, in compensable environments, a higher BSA·mass−1 may be a benefit to heat dissipation and decrease the risk of EHS. The purpose of the present analysis was to test the hypothesis that BSA·mass−1 ratio is an important biophysical characteristic contributing to the risk of EHS. We employed a matched case-control approach, where each individual with a diagnosis of EHS was matched to five controls who were never diagnosed with EHS but were in the same unit and had the same job title. We used a multivariate conditional logistic regression model including variables of BSA·mass−1, sex, age, military rank, and race. BSA·mass−1 significantly predicted EHS risk (P = 0.006), such that people with higher BSA·mass−1 were at lower risk of developing EHS when controlling for other potential factors such as age and race. This relationship persisted after adjustment for other anthropometric measures of body size including weight, BMI, and BSA. These data suggest that biophysical factors play an important role in EHS risk, particularly in a healthy military-aged cohort of men and women. NEW & NOTEWORTHY With the impacts of climate change yielding higher average ambient temperatures over time, the incidence of EHS for individuals participating in outdoor activities may consequently increase. With the larger sample size in this study compared with prior research in this field, we were able to use various methods that had not been applied before. For example, we were able to mutually adjust for different measurements of body size to understand which metric had the highest association with EHS risk. Understanding factors that may be modifiable may be important for developing interventions to counteract the increased risk of EHS associated with climate change.
In a series of three companion papers published in this Journal, we identify and validate the available thermal stress indicators (TSIs). In this second paper of the series, we identified the criteria to consider when adopting a TSI to protect individuals who work in the heat, and we weighed their relative importance using a Delphi exercise with 20 experts. Two Delphi iterations were adequate to reach consensus within the expert panel (Cronbach’s α = 0.86) for a set of 17 criteria with varying weights that should be considered when adopting a TSI to protect individuals who work in the heat. These criteria considered physiological parameters such as core/skin/mean body temperature, heart rate, and hydration status, as well as practicality, cost effectiveness, and health guidance issues. The 17 criteria were distributed across three occupational health-and-safety pillars: (i) contribution to improving occupational health (55% of total importance), (ii) mitigation of worker physiological strain (35.5% of total importance), and (iii) cost-effectiveness (9.5% of total importance). Three criteria [(i) relationship of a TSI with core temperature, (ii) having categories indicating the level of heat stress experienced by workers, and (iii) using its heat stress categories to provide recommendations for occupational safety and health] were considered significantly more important when selecting a TSI for protecting individuals who work in the heat, accumulating 37.2 percentage points. These 17 criteria allow the validation and comparison of TSIs that presently exist as well as those that may be developed in the coming years.
This study investigated the effects of pyridostigmine pretreatment, NBC protective gear, and heat-exercise exposure on psychomotor performance and subjective sensations in eight healthy male volunteers. Exercise in heat enhanced performance of vertical addition (+7.3%, p < 0.001) but prolonged the reaction time (+4.4%, p < 0.01). The effects of pyridostigmine, protective gear, and the interactions between the various stressors were not significant. Cognitive performance was not dependent on body core temperature. Multiple complaints of subjective discomfort arose from wearing the protective garment. The results suggest the existence of a significant subjective discomfort but an absence of major cognitive decrements in a multiple-stresses state of chemical warfare alertness.