Chen Li

Dr. Chen Li


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2024 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChen Li
Chen Li
LSLichun Sun
Lichun Sun
ZZZhigang Zhao
Zhigang Zhao
JZJian Zhang
Jian Zhang
Yong LiYong Li
Yong Li
LWLei Wang
Lei Wang
In the process of coalbed methane development, drilling fluid and fracturing fluid cannot achieve absolute compatibility with formation. The incompatibility between the working fluid and reservoir will lead to the intrusion of working fluid into the reservoir and cause reservoir pollution. This is a very common phenomenon. There is a large amount of pulverized coal in the coal seam, and the intrusion of working liquid will be combined with the pulverized coal to form cement to block the seepage space in the reservoir. Since pressure relief and fracturing fluid backflow will be performed at the first time after fracturing, the intrusion range of the working fluid is small, generally reaching 10 m to 50 m. Compared with a conventional gas reservoir or shale gas reservoir, the working fluid loss during CBM development will seriously affect the subsequent production project and even make the gas well lose production capacity. On the other hand, in order to avoid this phenomenon, measures such as acidification or volumetric fracturing are sometimes used to improve the seepage environment near the well and near the fracture. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively evaluate the impacts of working fluid filtration and reservoir reconstruction on production. In this study, a single well productivity evaluation model and sensitivity analysis method considering drilling fluid filtration loss, fracturing fluid filtration loss, reservoir reconstruction and other processes is proposed. The formation mechanism of fluid loss during drilling and fracturing is described, and the productivity evaluation model considering fluid loss is combined with the Langmuir isothermal adsorption equation, steady-state diffusion law, Darcy’s seepage law and Duhamel convolution formation. Combined with the distribution of actual gas reservoir flow characteristics, the sensitivity of single well productivity to gas reservoir porosity, gas reservoir permeability, coal seam adsorption coefficient, working fluid filtration loss and reservoir reconstruction measures are analyzed. Through the analysis and fitting of the actual production data on site, the relationship curve can better fit the field production data, and the evaluation results are in line with the drilling and fracturing conditions at that time and the subsequent production conditions, with small errors. The obtained method is suitable for predicting the productivity of fractured vertical wells in different working conditions and provides a basis for the development and productivity prediction of CBM reservoirs in China and in international cooperation.

11 April 2024 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJianzhong Liu
Jianzhong Liu
YSYanchun Su
Yanchun Su
LSLichun Sun
Lichun Sun
CLChen Li
Chen Li
LWLei Wang
Lei Wang
Yong LiYong Li
Yong Li
Hydraulic fracturing is an essential technology in the development of coalbed methane reservoirs. Hydraulic fracturing can create a highly conductive fracture in the reservoir and increase its permeability. At present, the focus of coalbed methane reservoir fracturing optimization is gradually shifting to the fracturing scale. In the current development process, more and more coalbed methane blocks try to increase the fracturing scale to increase the gas production of coalbed methane wells. Field tests show that gas production of coalbed methane wells will increase to a certain extent with the increase of fracturing scale. However, the increase in the scale of fracturing also increases its cost. Therefore, the most economical fracturing scale is not necessarily the optimal fracturing scale for gas production. The field test usually pays more attention to the gas production effect, but the development of a coalbed methane field should pay more attention to the economic benefit, and the optimization of fracturing should take the economic benefit as the goal. Taking economic benefits as the starting point, this paper uses fracturing simulation to calculate the fracture extension under different geological conditions and different fracturing scales. It also uses numerical simulation to calculate the gas well productivity under different fracture extension conditions. The economic evaluation model was established to calculate the economic benefits under different fracturing scales, and the optimal fracturing scale was obtained. Finally, the typical maps of fracturing optimization under different geological conditions are formed. The optimization method of fracturing scale integrating economy, fracturing, and gas reservoir is realized. The research results have been successfully applied to the optimization scheme of Liulin block development, and very good results have been achieved. Because this method is targeted at different geological conditions, it can be used to guide the fracturing optimization of other coalbed methane blocks and has very important significance for the development and optimization of coalbed methane reservoirs.

20 November 2024 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RFRuyong Feng
Ruyong Feng
CLChen Li
Chen Li
LSLichun Sun
Lichun Sun
JWJian Wang
Jian Wang
JLJia Liu
Jia Liu
NLNa Li
Na Li
The development of deep coalbed methane has become an important way to obtain natural gas in China. The development of deep CBM mainly depends on horizontal well technology. The different orientations of horizontal wells will have an important impact on the productivity of coalbed methane wells. The angle grid geological model of coalbed methane reservoirs with different inclination angles is established, and the deployment orientation of horizontal wells is changed to study the optimal deployment orientation of deep-saturated coalbed methane reservoirs. When CBM horizontal wells in deep saturated CBM reservoirs are deployed upward along the dip, well-controlled reserves, peak daily gas production, and cumulative gas production increase as the dip decreases. When deploying down the dip, with the increase in dip angle, the well-controlled reserves increase, and the peak daily gas production and cumulative gas production first increase and then decrease. In the low-dip reservoir, the development effect of horizontal wells deployed in different directions is better than that in the up-dip direction. In the high-dip reservoir, the development effect of horizontal wells deployed along the strike is better than that in the up-dip and down-dip directions. The development effect of horizontal wells is controlled by both well-controlled reserves and reservoir pressure drop. Because this method is targeted at different geological conditions, it can be used to guide the horizontal well optimization of other coalbed methane blocks and has very important significance for the development and optimization of coalbed methane reservoirs.

2 July 2024 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLichun Sun
Lichun Sun
ZZZhigang Zhao
Zhigang Zhao
CLChen Li
Chen Li
RFRuyong Feng
Ruyong Feng
YMYanjun Meng
Yanjun Meng
YLYong Li
Yong Li
China is rich in high-grade coalbed methane resources, accounting for one-third of the total amount of coalbed methane resources. Qinshui Basin is the main high ranking coalbed methane mining basin in China. In the early stage of CBM development, low-production and low-efficiency wells were formed in the process of block development because of an insufficient understanding of reservoir geological conditions. The existence of low-yield and low-efficiency wells with low output and a poor development benefit seriously restricts the efficient development of coalbed methane. In order to improve the overall development efficiency of coalbed methane fields, how to revitalize low-yield and low-efficiency wells is the main problem facing the development process of coalbed methane. With the deepening understanding of the study area geology, the formation of low-yield and low-efficiency wells has been basically identified. With the advancement of development technology, developers have the ability to retrofit some low-producing and inefficient wells. Low-production and low-efficiency wells are widely distributed. It is difficult to find the criteria for classifying low-producing and low-efficiency wells because of the great differences in geological conditions and reservoir physical properties in different blocks. In addition, the causes of a low-production and low-efficiency well are complex, as the same well is often caused by many reasons, and how to identify the causes of low-production and low-efficiency wells is difficult. In recent decades, developers have studied many methods to retrofit low-production wells, but the retrofit results are not satisfactory. How to choose an economical and efficient reservoir reconstruction method to revitalize low-production and low-efficiency wells is particularly important. This paper starts with the definition of low-production and low-efficiency wells in different blocks, combining an economic evaluation and productivity characteristics to judge whether they are low-production and low-efficiency wells, and defines the distribution of low-production and low-efficiency wells in blocks. The reasons for the formation of low-production and low-efficiency wells are analyzed with the geological characteristics, production dynamic performance, and engineering reconstruction effects. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the current relatively mature low-production and low-efficiency well treatment measures, clearly identifies the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment measures, and takes corresponding stimulation measures for different causes of low-production and low-efficiency wells. The research shows that there are 687 low-production and low-efficiency wells in block A, accounting for 69.4% of the total number of wells, and the low-production and low-efficiency wells account for a relatively large proportion; so, it is necessary to treat them. The main causes of low-production and low-efficiency wells are geology, engineering and drainage systems. The geological reason mainly refers to the low gas production of coalbed methane wells influenced by three factors: resource abundance, faults, and collapse columns. According to the different causes, three treatment measures of large-scale secondary fracturing, temporary plugging, and diversion fracturing and foam fracturing are put forward. The research method in this paper is targeted at different geological conditions so it can be used to guide the treatment of low-yield and low-efficiency wells in other CBM blocks, and it has very important significance for revitalizing the existing low-efficiency CBM assets and improving the development efficiency of CBM.

6 February 2024 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChen Li
Chen Li
LSLichun Sun
Lichun Sun
ZZZhigang Zhao
Zhigang Zhao
JZJian Zhang
Jian Zhang
CWCunwu Wang
Cunwu Wang
YMYanjun Meng
Yanjun Meng
Different from conventional gas reservoirs, the permeability of coalbeds is affected by stress sensitivity and matrix shrinkage during production. These two conditions lead to lower permeability in the reservoir and affect the production efficiency of the gas well. In addition, coalbed methane wells have single-phase water flow in the initial stage of production. When the reservoir pressure is reduced to its critical desorption pressure, the adsorbed gas in the reservoir desorbs into the pore space and participates in the flow. The flow state in the reservoir changes from single-phase to two phase, and the permeability of the reservoir decreases. The occurrence of these three damage mechanisms is related to the flow rate of fluid in the reservoir. At present, there is a lack of research on the optimization of drainage and production systems considering the damage mechanism of coal reservoirs. This study comprehensively considers how to optimize the production rate of coal reservoirs under the influence of stress sensitivity, matrix shrinkage and two phase flow in the production process to achieve the purpose of production with the least damage to the reservoir.

13 January 2025 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChen Li
Chen Li
LSLichun Sun
Lichun Sun
ZZZhigang Zhao
Zhigang Zhao
JZJian Zhang
Jian Zhang
CWCunwu Wang
Cunwu Wang
YMYanjun Meng
Yanjun Meng
In the process of CBM development, the fracturing effect has always been a major controlling factor for CBM productivity. The coal fragmentation degree is a special geological feature in the process of CBM development and research, and other types of reservoirs are not involved in this study. This paper addresses the problem of the inaccurate prediction of the reservoir fragmentation degree by studying the influence of the reservoir type and depth plane curvature on the reservoir fragmentation degree based on the coalbed characteristics of a block. It also studies the influence of faults on the reservoir fragmentation degree based on the reservoir geological characteristics and seismic inversion results. Combined with dynamic data on coalbed methane production, the influence of different geological characteristics on the productivity of coalbed methane wells is studied. The research results show that the reservoir fragmentation degree is mainly affected by the reservoir type. In the coal-forming period or after coal forming, the stronger the tectonic movement is, the higher the reservoir fragmentation degree is. Another manifestation of tectonic movement is faults. The effect of the reservoir fragmentation degree on production is negative. The better the reservoir fragmentation degree is, the worse the reconstruction effect of the coalbed methane well is, and the worse the later production effect is. At the same time, the faults generated by tectonic movement affect not only the reservoir fragmentation degree but also the water production of coalbed methane wells. The closer a well is to a fault, the greater the risk is of high water production and low gas production. Therefore, in the process of selecting a desert area, a complex reservoir fragmentation degree and areas with strong tectonic movement should be avoided. This study takes a structural control block as the research object to study the main controlling factors of coalbed methane reservoir productivity in complex structures. At present, there is no relevant research on this structure in terms of controlling productivity at home or abroad. The research in this paper can provide technical support for the development of similar CBM reservoirs. This method can guide the development of coalbed methane fields and lay a foundation for the selection of favorable coalbed methane reservoir areas.