Tyler Westover

Dr. Tyler Westover


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in Green Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DCDaniel Carpenter
Daniel Carpenter
Tyler WestoverTyler Westover
Tyler Westover
SCStefan Czernik
Stefan Czernik
WJWhitney Jablonski
Whitney Jablonski
Renewable transportation fuels from biomass have the potential to substantially reduce greenhouse gas emissions and diversify global fuel supplies. Thermal conversion by fast pyrolysis converts up to 75% of the starting plant material (and its energy content) to a bio-oil intermediate suitable for upgrading to motor fuel. Woody biomass, by far the most widely-used and researched material, is generally preferred in thermochemical processes due to its low ash content and high quality bio-oil produced. However, the availability and cost of biomass resources, e.g. forest residues, agricultural residues, or dedicated energy crops, vary greatly by region and will be key determinates in the overall economic feasibility of a pyrolysis-to-fuel process. Formulation or blending of various feedstocks, combined with thermal and/or chemical pretreatment, could facilitate a consistent, high-volume, lower-cost biomass supply to an emerging biofuels industry. However, the impact of biomass type and pretreatment conditions on bio-oil yield and quality, and the potential process implications, are not well understood. This literature review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding the effect of feedstock and pretreatments on the yield, product distribution, and upgradability of bio-oil.

1 January 2013 in Biofuels
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKevin L Kenney
Kevin L Kenney
WSWilliam A Smith
William A Smith
GGGarold L Gresham
Garold L Gresham
Tyler WestoverTyler Westover
Tyler Westover

23 November 2015 in BioEnergy Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CWChristopher Williams
Christopher Williams
Tyler WestoverTyler Westover
Tyler Westover
RERachel M. Emerson
Rachel M. Emerson
Jaya Shankar TumuluruJaya Shankar Tumuluru
Jaya Shankar Tumuluru
CLChenlin Li
Chenlin Li
Terrestrial lignocellulosic biomass has the potential to be a carbon neutral and domestic source of fuels and chemicals. However, the innate variability of biomass resources, such as herbaceous and woody materials, and the inconsistency within a single resource due to disparate growth and harvesting conditions, presents challenges for downstream processes which often require materials that are physically and chemically consistent. Intrinsic biomass characteristics, including moisture content, carbohydrate and ash compositions, bulk density, and particle size/shape distributions are highly variable and can impact the economics of transforming biomass into value-added products. For instance, ash content increases by an order of magnitude between woody and herbaceous feedstocks (from ∼0.5 to 5 %, respectively) while lignin content drops by a factor of two (from ∼30 to 15 %, respectively). This increase in ash and reduction in lignin leads to biofuel conversion consequences, such as reduced pyrolysis oil yields for herbaceous products as compared to woody material. In this review, the sources of variability for key biomass characteristics are presented for multiple types of biomass. Additionally, this review investigates the major impacts of the variability in biomass composition on four conversion processes: fermentation, hydrothermal liquefaction, pyrolysis, and direct combustion. Finally, future research processes aimed at reducing the detrimental impacts of biomass variability on conversion to fuels and chemicals are proposed. © 2015 Battelle Energy Alliance, LLC, contract manager for Idaho National Laboratory.

1 June 2012 in Industrial Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Jaya Shankar TumuluruJaya Shankar Tumuluru
Jaya Shankar Tumuluru
JHJ. Richard Hess
J. Richard Hess
RBRichard D. Boardman
Richard D. Boardman
CWChristopher T. Wright
Christopher T. Wright
Tyler WestoverTyler Westover
Tyler Westover
There is a growing interest internationally to use more biomass for power generation, given the potential for significant environmental benefits and long-term fuel sustainability. However, the use of biomass alone for power generation is subject to serious challenges, such as feedstock supply reliability, quality, and stability, as well as comparative cost, except in situations in which biomass is locally sourced. In most countries, only a limited biomass supply infrastructure exists. Alternatively, co-firing biomass along with coal offers several advantages; these include reducing challenges related to biomass quality, buffering the system against insufficient feedstock quantity, and mitigating the costs of adapting existing coal power plants to feed biomass exclusively. There are some technical constraints, such as low heating values, low bulk density, and grindability or size-reduction challenges, as well as higher moisture, volatiles, and ash content, which limit the co-firing ratios in direct and indirect co-firing. To achieve successful co-firing of biomass with coal, biomass feedstock specifications must be established to direct pretreatment options in order to modify biomass materials into a format that is more compatible with coal co-firing. The impacts on particle transport systems, flame stability, pollutant formation, and boiler-tube fouling/corrosion must also be minimized by setting feedstock specifications, which may include developing new feedstock composition by formulation or blending. Some of the issues, like feeding, co-milling, and fouling, can be overcome by pretreatment methods including washing/leaching, steam explosion, hydrothermal carbonization, and torrefaction, and densification methods such as pelletizing and briquetting. Integrating formulation, pretreatment, and densification will help to overcome issues related to physical and chemical composition, storage, and logistics to successfully co-fire higher percentages of biomass (>40%) with coal.

17 December 2008 in Nano Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Tyler WestoverTyler Westover
Tyler Westover
RJReese Jones
Reese Jones
JHJ. Y. Huang
J. Y. Huang
GWGeorge Wang
George Wang
ELElaine Lai
Elaine Lai
ATA. Alec Talin
A. Alec Talin

24 April 2015 in Energy & Fuels
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DHDaniel Howe
Daniel Howe
Tyler WestoverTyler Westover
Tyler Westover
DCDaniel Carpenter
Daniel Carpenter
DSDaniel Santosa
Daniel Santosa
RERachel Emerson
Rachel Emerson
CLCraig Lukins
Craig Lukins