Sensorimotor control studies have predominantly focused on how motor regions of the brain relay basic movement-related information such as position and velocity. However, motor control is often complex, involving the integration of sensory information, planning, visuomotor tracking, spatial mapping, retrieval and storage of memories, and may even be emotionally driven. This suggests that many more regions in the brain are involved beyond premotor and motor cortices. In this study, we exploited an experimental setup wherein activity from over 87 non-motor structures of the brain were recorded in eight human subjects executing a center-out motor task. The subjects were implanted with depth electrodes for clinical purposes. Using training data, we constructed subject-specific models that related spectral power of neural activity in six different frequency bands as well as a combined model containing the aggregation of multiple frequency bands to movement speed. We then tested the models by evaluating their ability to decode movement speed from neural activity in the test data set. The best models achieved a correlation of 0.38 ± 0.03 (mean ± standard deviation). Further, the decoded speeds matched the categorical representation of the test trials as correct or incorrect with an accuracy of 70 ± 2.75% across subjects. These models included features from regions such as the right hippocampus, left and right middle temporal gyrus, intraparietal sulcus, and left fusiform gyrus across multiple frequency bands. Perhaps more interestingly, we observed that the non-dominant hemisphere (ipsilateral to dominant hand) was most influential in decoding movement speed.

Sensorimotor control and the involvement of motor brain regions has been extensively studied, but the role nonmotor brain regions play during movements has been overlooked. This is particularly due to the difficulty of recording from multiple regions in the brain during motor control. In this study, we utilize stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) recording techniques to explore the role nonmotor brain areas have on the way we move. Nine humans were implanted with SEEG depth electrodes for clinical purposes, which rendered access to local field potential (LFP) activity in deep and peripheral nonmotor structures. Participants performed fast and slow arm reaching movements using a robotic manipulandum. In this study, we explored whether neural activity in a given nonmotor brain structure correlated to movement path metrics including: path length, path deviation, and path speed. Statistical analysis revealed correlations between averaged neural activity in middle temporal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, and fusiform gyrus and our path metrics both within and across the subjects. Furthermore, we split trials across subjects into two groups: one group consisted of trials with high values of each path metric and the other with low values. We then found significant differences in LFP power in specific frequency bands (e.g. beta) during movement between each group. These results suggest that nonmotor regions may dynamically encode path-related information during movement.

Humans’ ability to adapt and learn relies on reflecting on past performance. These experiences form latent representations called internal states that induce movement variability that improves how we interact with our environment. Our study uncovered temporal dynamics and neural substrates of two states from ten subjects implanted with intracranial depth electrodes while they performed a goal-directed motor task with physical perturbations. We identified two internal states using state-space models: one tracking past errors and the other past perturbations. These states influenced reaction times and speed errors, revealing how subjects strategize from trial history. Using local field potentials from over 100 brain regions, we found large-scale brain networks such as the dorsal attention and default mode network modulate visuospatial attention based on recent performance and environmental feedback. Notably, these networks were more prominent in higher-performing subjects, emphasizing their role in improving motor performance by regulating movement variability through internal states.

Neural prostheses have generally relied on signals from cortical motor regions to control reaching movements of a robotic arm. However, little work has been done in exploring the involvement of nonmotor cortical and associative regions during motor tasks. In this study, we identify regions which may encode direction during planning and movement of a center-out motor task. Local field potentials were collected using stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) from nine epilepsy patients implanted with multiple depth electrodes for clinical purposes. Spectral analysis of the recorded data was performed using nonparametric statistical techniques to identify regions that may encode direction of movements during the motor task. The analysis revealed several nonmotor regions; including the right insular cortex, right temporal pole, right superior parietal lobule, and the right lingual gyrus, that encode directionality before and after movement onset. We observed that each of these regions encode direction in different frequency bands. This preliminary study suggests that nonmotor regions may be useful in assisting in neural prosthetic control.

Decision-making is a cognitive process involving working memory, executive function, and attention. However, the connectivity of large-scale brain networks during decision-making is not well understood. This is because gaining access to large-scale brain networks in humans is still a novel process. Here, we used SEEG (stereoelectroencephalography) to record neural activity from the default mode network (DMN), dorsal attention network (DAN), and frontoparietal network (FN) in ten humans while they performed a gambling task in the form of the card game, “War”. By observing these networks during a decision-making period, we related the activity of and connectivity between these networks. In particular, we found that gamma band activity was directly related to a participant’s ability to bet logically, deciding what betting amount would result in the highest monetary gain or lowest monetary loss throughout a session of the game. We also found connectivity between the DAN and the relation to a participant’s performance. Specifically, participants with higher connectivity between and within these networks had higher earnings. Our preliminary findings suggest that connectivity and activity between these networks are essential during decision-making.