An increasing number of anticancer agents has been proposed in recent years with the attempt to overcome treatment-resistant cancer cells and particularly cancer stem cells (CSC), the major culprits for tumour resistance and recurrence. However, a huge obstacle to treatment success is the ineffective delivery of drugs within the tumour environment due to limited solubility, short circulation time or inconsistent stability of compounds that, together with concomitant dose-limiting systemic toxicity, contribute to hamper the achievement of therapeutic drug concentrations. The synthetic retinoid Fenretinide (4-hydroxy (phenyl)retinamide; 4-HPR) formerly emerged as a promising anticancer agent based on pre-clinical and clinical studies. However, a major limitation of fenretinide is traditionally represented by its poor aqueous solubility/bioavailability due to its hydrophobic nature, that undermined the clinical success of previous clinical trials. Here, we developed a novel nano-micellar fenretinide formulation called bionanofenretinide (Bio-nFeR), based on drug encapsulation in an ion-pair stabilized lipid matrix, with the aim to raise fenretinide bioavailability and antitumour efficacy. Bio-nFeR displayed marked antitumour activity against lung, colon and melanoma CSC both in vitro and in tumour xenografts, in absence of mice toxicity. Bio-nFeR is suitable for oral administration, reaching therapeutic concentrations within tumours and an unprecedented therapeutic activity in vivo as single agent. Altogether, our results indicate Bio-nFeR as a novel anticancer agent with low toxicity and high activity against tumourigenic cells, potentially useful for the treatment of solid tumours of multiple origin.

PURPOSE: The AIEOP-BFM ALL 2009 protocol included, at the end of the induction phase, a randomized study of patients with high-risk (HR) ALL to investigate if an intensive exposure to pegylated L-asparaginase (PEG-ASNASE, 2,500 IU/sqm once a week × 4) on top of BFM consolidation phase IB allowed us to decrease minimal residual disease (MRD) and improve outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 1,097 patients presented, from June 2010 to February 2017, with one or more of the following HR criteria: KMT2A::AFF1 rearrangement, hypodiploidy, prednisone poor response, poor bone marrow response at day 15 (Flow MRD ≥10%), or no complete remission (CR) at the end of induction. Of them, 809 (85.1%) were randomly assigned to receive (404) or not receive (405) four weekly doses of PEG-ASNASE. RESULTS: By intention to treat (ITT) analysis, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with polimerase chain reaction MRD ≥5 × 10⁻⁴ at the end of phase IB in the experimental versus control arm (13.9% v 17.0%, P = .25). The 5-year event-free survival (median follow-up 6.3 years) by ITT in the experimental and control arms was 70.4% (2.3) versus 75.0% (2.2; P = .18), and the 5-year overall survival was 81.5% (2.0) versus 84.0% (1.9; P = .25), respectively. The corresponding 5-year cumulative incidence of death in CR was 9.5% (1.5) versus 5.7% (1.2; P = .08), and that of relapse was 17.7% (1.9) versus 17.2% (1.9), respectively ( P = .94). Adverse reactions in phase IB occurred in 22.2% and 8.9% of patients in the experimental and control arm, respectively ( P < .001). CONCLUSION: Additional PEG-ASNASE in phase IB did not translate into a benefit for decreasing relapse incidence but was associated with higher toxicity. Further improvements with conventional chemotherapy might be difficult in the context of intensive treatment protocols.

Background: Prevention and treatment of metastatic breast cancer (BC) is an unmet clinical need. The retinoic acid derivative fenretinide (FeR) was previously evaluated in Phase I-III clinical trials but, despite its excellent tolerability and antitumor activity in preclinical models, showed limited therapeutic efficacy due to poor bioavailability. We recently generated a new micellar formulation of FeR, Bionanofenretinide (Bio-nFeR) showing enhanced bioavailability, low toxicity, and strong antitumor efficacy on human lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and melanoma xenografts. In the present study, we tested the effect of Bio-nFeR on a preclinical model of metastatic BC. Methods: We used BC cell lines for in vitro analyses of cell viability, cell cycle and migratory capacity. For in vivo studies, we used HER2/neu transgenic mice (neuT) as a model of spontaneously metastatic BC. Mice were treated orally with Bio-nFeR and at sacrifice primary and metastatic breast tumors were analyzed by histology and immunohistochemistry. Molecular pathways activated in primary tumors were analyzed by immunoblotting. Stem cell content was assessed by flow cytometry, immunoblotting and functional assays such as colony formation ex vivo and second transplantation assay in immunocompromised mice. Results: Bio-nFeR inhibited the proliferation and migration of neuT BC cells in vitro and showed significant efficacy against BC onset in neuT mice. Importantly, Bio-nFeR showed the highest effectiveness against metastatic progression, counteracting both metastasis initiation and expansion. The main mechanism of Bio-nFeR action consists of promoting tumor dormancy through a combined induction of antiproliferative signals and inhibition of the mTOR pathway. Conclusion: The high effectiveness of Bio-nFeR in the neuT model of mammary carcinogenesis, coupled with its low toxicity, indicates this formulation as a potential candidate for the treatment of metastatic BC and for the adjuvant therapy of BC patients at high risk of developing metastasis.

Chemotherapy is the standard of care for most malignancies. Its tumor debulking effect in adjuvant or neoadjuvant settings is unquestionable, although secondary effects have been reported that paradoxically promote metastasis. Chemotherapy affects the hematopoietic precursors leading to myelosuppression, with neutropenia being the main hematological toxicity induced by cytotoxic therapy. We used renal and lung murine tumor models metastatic to the lung to study chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in the metastatic process. Cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin, two myelosuppressive drugs, but not cisplatin, increased the burden of artificial metastases to the lung, by reducing neutrophils. This effect was recapitulated by treatment with anti-Ly6G, the selective antibody-mediated neutrophil depletion that unleashed the formation of lung metastases in both artificial and spontaneous metastasis settings. The increased cancer dissemination was reversed by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-mediated boosting of neutrophils in combination with chemotherapy. CIN affected the early metastatic colonization of the lung, quite likely promoting the proliferation of tumor cells extravasated into the lung at 24–72 hours. CIN did not affect the late events of the metastatic process, with established metastasis to the lung, nor was there any effect on the release of cancer cells from the primary, whose growth was, in fact, somewhat inhibited. This work suggests a role of neutrophils associated to a common cancer treatment side effect and claims a deep dive into the relationship between chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and metastasis.