This study aimed to evaluate scientific evidence of the benefit of the use of insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and Intermittent preventive treatment (IPT) on the birth weight of newborns and the hemoglobin level of the mother when used to prevent malaria during pregnancy. This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on 467 hospitalized women in the Maternity Ward of Centre Hospitalier de Kingasani II, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire that was pre-tested during a face-to-face interview. Apart from basic statistics, the chi-square test was used to compare proportions. Multivariate analysis (logistic regression) was used to identify variables significantly associated with the 95% confidence interval (CI). The ITN ownership rate was 81% (95% CI: 77–84) and the ITN use rate was 66% (95% CI: 62–70). Sixty-five percent (95% CI: 60–69) reported having received at least three doses of IPT during pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyramethemine (IPTp-SP). There was a statistically significant difference in hemoglobin levels between hospitalized women who did not use the ITN (9.4 g/dL IIQ: 8.7–9.9) and those who did (11 g/dL IIQ: 9.8–12.2). The non-use of the ITN was associated with low birth weight (aOR = 3.6; 95% CI: 2.1–6.2; p < 0.001) and anemia in pregnant women (cOR = 2.41; 95% CI: 1.16–5.01; p = 0.018). The use of ITN and taking at least three doses of ITP during pregnancy are associated with good birth weight. The number of doses of IPTp received during antenatal care is associated with the maternal hemoglobin level in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Background: Low peripheral parasitaemia caused by sequestration of Plasmodium falciparum in the placenta hampers the diagnosis of malaria in pregnant women, leading to microscopy or conventional rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) false-negative results. Although mainly asymptomatic, maternal malaria remains harmful to pregnant women and their offspring in endemic settings and must be adequately diagnosed. Ultra-sensitive RDTs (uRDTs) are thought to be more sensitive than RDTs, and their diagnostic performance was assessed in the current study in pregnant women living in Kinshasa, a stable malaria transmission area in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Methods: To assess and compare the diagnostic performances of both RDTs and uRDTs, 497 peripheral blood samples were tested using microscopy and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) as the index and the reference tests, respectively. The agreement between the different diagnostic tests assessed was estimated by Cohen's Kappa test. Results: The median parasite density by qPCR was 292 p/μL of blood [IQR (49.7–1137)]. Using qPCR as the reference diagnostic test, the sensitivities of microscopy, RDT and uRDT were respectively [55.7% (95% CI 47.6–63.6)], [81.7% (95%CI 74.7–87.3)] and [88% (95% CI 81.9–92.6)]. The specificities of the tests were calculated at 98.5% (95% CI 96.6–99.5), 95.2% (95% CI 92.5–97.2) and 94.4% (95% CI 91.4–96.6) for microscopy, RDT and uRDT, respectively. The agreement between qPCR and uRDT was almost perfect (Kappa = 0.82). For parasite density (qPCR) below 100 p/µL, the sensitivity of RDT was 62% (95% CI 47.1–75.3) compared to 68% (95% CI 53.3–80.4) for uRDT. Between 100 and 200 p/µL, the sensitivity of RDT was higher, but still lower compared to uRDT: 89.4% (95% CI 66.8–98.7) for RDT versus 100% (95% CI 82.3–100) for uRDT. In both cases, microscopy was lower, with 20% (95% CI 10–33.7) and 47.3% (95% CI 24.4–71.1) respectively. Conclusions: uRDT has the potential to improve malaria management in pregnant women as it has been found to be slightly more sensitive than RDT in the detection of malaria in pregnant women but the difference was not significant. Microscopy has a more limited value for the diagnosis of malaria during the pregnancy, because of its lower sensitivity.

Introduction: Malaria infection during pregnancy increases the risk of low birth weight and infant mortality and should be prevented and treated. Artemisinin-based combination treatments are generally well tolerated, safe and effective; the most used being artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP). Pyronaridine-artesunate (PA) is a new artemisinin-based combination. The main objective of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of PA versus AL or DP when administered to pregnant women with confirmed Plasmodium falciparum infection in the second or third trimester. The primary hypothesis is the pairwise non-inferiority of PA as compared with either AL or DP. Methods and analysis: A phase 3, non-inferiority, randomised, open-label clinical trial to determine the safety and efficacy of AL, DP and PA in pregnant women with malaria in five sub-Saharan, malaria-endemic countries (Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Mali, Mozambique and the Gambia). A total of 1875 pregnant women will be randomised to one of the treatment arms. Women will be actively monitored until Day 63 post-treatment, at delivery and 4–6 weeks after delivery, and infants’ health will be checked on their first birthday. The primary endpoint is the PCR-adjusted rate of adequate clinical and parasitological response at Day 42 in the per-protocol population. Ethics and dissemination: This protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee for Health Research in Burkina Faso, the National Health Ethics Committee in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology/Faculty of Pharmacy in Mali, the Gambia Government/MRCG Joint Ethics Committee and the National Bioethics Committee for Health in Mozambique. Written informed consent will be obtained from each individual prior to her participation in the study. The results will be published in peer-reviewed open access journals and presented at (inter)national conferences and meetings. Trial registration number: PACTR202011812241529.

Background: Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is an important malaria control strategy in sub-Saharan Africa. Indeed, it overcomes the risk of misdiagnosis due to low peripheral parasitemia during pregnancy by treating women with SP on predetermined schedules. However, over time, the spread of Plasmodium-resistant strains has threatened this strategy in many countries. As an alternative, the intermittent screening and treatment for pregnancy (ISTp) aims at a monthly screening of pregnant women, preferably by using very sensitive tests such as ultrasensitive rapid diagnostic tests (us-RDTs) and the treatment of positive cases with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) regardless of the presence of symptoms. Unlike IPTp-SP, ISTp prevents overuse of antimalarials limiting the drug pressure on parasites, an advantage which can be potentiated by using an ACT like pyronaridine-artesunate (Pyramax®) that is not yet used in pregnant women in the field. Methods: This study aims to compare the non-inferiority of ISTp using us-RDTs and Pyramax® versus IPTp-SP on malaria in pregnancy through a randomized clinical trial performed in Kisenso, Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, a malaria perennial transmission area. Discussion: The results will be essential for the National Malaria Control Program to update the malaria prevention policy in pregnant women in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04783051

The declining effectiveness of Intermittent Preventive Treatment in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP) due to the emergence of Plasmodium falciparum resistance highlights the need for alternative malaria prevention strategies in pregnant women. A novel approach was proposed: screening with an ultra-sensitive rapid diagnostic test and treating positive with pyronaridine-artesunate (ISTp-uRDT-PA). This trial compared the impact of both strategies on maternal malaria and anaemia, abortion, intrauterine death, birth weight, preterm delivery. This non-inferiority trial, conducted in Kinshasa, enrolled pregnant women in their second and third trimesters. Participants in the IPTp-SP arm (n = 124) received SP at monthly antenatal visit as per guidelines, while those in the ISTp-uRDT-PA arm (n = 126) were screened monthly with an uRDT and treated with PA if positive. Primary outcomes included asymptomatic parasitaemia (uRDT positive without fever) or symptomatic parasitaemia (uRDT positive with fever or history of fever, and parasite density by microscopy during pregnancy. Asymptomatic parasitaemia by uRDT during pregnancy was similar in both arms (20.8% in IPTp-SP vs 21.0% in ISTp-uRDT-PA). At delivery, asymptomatic parasitaemia was 51% higher in ISTp-uRDT-PA arm compared to IPTp-SP (cRR = 1.51 [95% CI 0.76–3.00], p = 0.24). Symptomatic parasitaemia by uRDT at delivery showed no significant difference. Malaria by microscopy at enrolment was detected in 34.4% of women. Malaria by microscopy during pregnancy was 9.6% in IPTp-SP and 10.1%. ISTp-uRDT-PA (p = 0.19), decreasing to 3.2% and 0.9%, respectively, at delivery (p = 0.24). Mean haemoglobin concentration at enrolment was 10.1 g/dl in the IPTp-SP and 9.8 g/dl in the ISTp-uRDT-PA with no significant difference in maternal anaemia at delivery (7%; cRR = 1.07 [95% CI 0.87–1.31], p = 0.52). No significant differences were found for spontaneous abortions and in utero death in both arms. The risk of a premature newborn declined by 14% in ISTp-uRDT-PA compared to the IPTp-SP arm (cRR = 0.86 [95% CI 0.29–2.85], p = 0.79) while low-birth-weight was not significantly higher (cRR = 1.74 [95% CI 0.86–3.53], p = 0.12). ISTp-uRDT-PA was non inferior to IPTp-SP and can be considered as a future alternative for IPTp-SP in case this intervention can no longer be used due to high SP resistance. Clinical trials registration: NCT04783051.

To compare the neurodevelopment and malaria susceptibility of infants born to mothers infected or uninfected with malaria at the time of delivery. A cohort of 388 mother-child pairs was recruited at delivery. Maternal malaria was assessed by microscopy at birth, and infant malaria was based on a history of fever. Infant neurodevelopment was evaluated at 4-6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), which include scores for gross motor (GM), and early learning composite (ELC). Infant malaria incidence and neurological functioning were compared based on malaria exposure at delivery. In total, 62/385 (16.1%) infants were exposed to malaria at delivery, confirmed by microscopy for both peripheral and placental malaria. These exposed infants had a significantly lower birth weight (LBW) (2824.68 ± 493.85 g) than those born of uninfected mothers (3032.69 ± 487.8 g; p = 0.0023). GM at 12 months showed no significant differences between groups (mean GM score for exposed: 47.2 ± 9.8 vs unexposed: 47.6 ± 9.7; p = 0.757). However, infants exposed to malaria infection had significantly lower ECL (-7.70 [95% confidence interval {CI}: -15.0, -0.36]; P = 0.04). Infant malaria, malnutrition, and LBW were significantly associated with reduced GM scores (-1.2 [95% CI: -2.25, -0.18], P = 0.021; -0.96 [95% CI: -1.92, -0.02], and -1.59 [95% CI: -3.06, -0.11], respectively). Malaria incidence peaked at 12 months, affecting 54.7% of the exposed group vs 70.6% of non-exposed infants (risk ratio = 1.04 [95% CI: 0.87-1.25], P = 0.631). Malaria at delivery was associated with impaired ELC but not with GM. Malaria susceptibility during the first 12 months was not influenced by maternal malaria exposure. However, LBW, malnutrition and infant malaria impacted infant development.