Mir Babar Basir

Dr. Mir Babar Basir


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 April 2019 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMba Ruth Fisher Ba
Mba Ruth Fisher Ba
NKNavin K. Kapur
Navin K. Kapur
KPKirit Patel
Kirit Patel
MSMurad A. Salam
Murad A. Salam
TSTheodore Schreiber
Theodore Schreiber
MBMir Babar Basir
Mir Babar Basir

20 December 2017 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMir Babar Basir
Mir Babar Basir
TSTheodore Schreiber
Theodore Schreiber
SDSimon Dixon
Simon Dixon
KAKhaldoon Alaswad
Khaldoon Alaswad
KPKirit Patel
Kirit Patel
WOWilliam W. O'NEill
William W. O'NEill

5 December 2023 in Journal of the American Heart Association
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMir Babar Basir
Mir Babar Basir
ALAlejandro Lemor
Alejandro Lemor
SGSarah Gorgis
Sarah Gorgis
KPKirit C. Patel
Kirit C. Patel
BKBrian C. Kolski
Brian C. Kolski
WOWilliam W. O'NEill
William W. O'NEill
Background: Acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI‐CS) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices increase systemic blood pressure and end organ perfusion while reducing cardiac filling pressures. Methods and Results: The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative (NCT03677180) is a single‐arm, multicenter study. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of utilizing early MCS with Impella in patients presenting with AMI‐CS. The primary end point was in‐hospital mortality. A total of 406 patients were enrolled at 80 sites between 2016 and 2020. Average age was 64±12 years, 24% were female, 17% had a witnessed out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, 27% had in‐hospital cardiac arrest, and 9% were under active cardiopulmonary resuscitation during MCS implantation. Patients presented with a mean systolic blood pressure of 77.2±19.2 mm Hg, 85% of patients were on vasopressors or inotropes, mean lactate was 4.8±3.9 mmol/L and cardiac power output was 0.67±0.29 watts. At 24 hours, mean systolic blood pressure improved to 103.9±17.8 mm Hg, lactate to 2.7±2.8 mmol/L, and cardiac power output to 1.0±1.3 watts. Procedural survival, survival to discharge, survival to 30 days, and survival to 1 year were 99%, 71%, 68%, and 53%, respectively. Conclusions: Early use of MCS in AMI‐CS is feasible across varying health care settings and resulted in improvements to early hemodynamics and perfusion. Survival rates to hospital discharge were high. Given the encouraging results from our analysis, randomized clinical trials are warranted to assess the role of utilizing early MCS, using a standardized, multidisciplinary approach.

16 July 2020 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IHIvan D. Hanson
Ivan D. Hanson
TTTravis Tagami
Travis Tagami
RMRamy Mando
Ramy Mando
ABAbdalla Kara Balla
Abdalla Kara Balla
SDSimon R. Dixon
Simon R. Dixon
NINational Cardiogenic Shock Investigators
National Cardiogenic Shock Investigators

3 August 2021 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MBMir Babar Basir
Mir Babar Basir
ALAlejandro Lemor
Alejandro Lemor
SGSarah Gorgis
Sarah Gorgis
ATAngela M. Taylor
Angela M. Taylor
BTBehnam Tehrani
Behnam Tehrani
TIThe National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative Investigators
The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative Investigators

9 March 2022 in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAlejandro Lemor
Alejandro Lemor
MDMohammed F. Dabbagh
Mohammed F. Dabbagh
DCDavid Cohen
David Cohen
PVPedro Villablanca
Pedro Villablanca
BTBehnam Tehrani
Behnam Tehrani
MBMir Babar Basir
Mir Babar Basir