EVANGELOS TZAMAKOS

Mr. EVANGELOS TZAMAKOS

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 April 2024 in Biomolecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Dimitra MetallinouDimitra Metallinou
Dimitra Metallinou
GKGrigorios Karampas
Grigorios Karampas
MPMaria Loukia Pavlou
Maria Loukia Pavlou
MLMaria Ioanna Louma
Maria Ioanna Louma
AMAIMILIA MANTZOU
AIMILIA MANTZOU
NICOLETTA IACOVIDOUNICOLETTA IACOVIDOU
NICOLETTA IACOVIDOU
Neonatal brain injury (NBI) is a critical condition for preterm neonates with potential long-term adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. This prospective longitudinal case–control study aimed at investigating the levels and prognostic value of serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) during the first 3 days of life in preterm neonates (<34 weeks) that later developed brain injury in the form of either periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) or intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) during their hospitalization. Participants were recruited from one neonatal intensive care unit, and on the basis of birth weight and gestational age, we matched each case (n = 29) with a neonate who had a normal head ultrasound scan (n = 29). We report that serum NSE levels during the first three days of life do not differ significantly between control and preterm neonates with NBI. Nevertheless, subgroup analysis revealed that neonates with IVH had significantly higher concentrations of serum NSE in comparison to controls and neonates with PVL on the third day of life (p = 0.014 and p = 0.033, respectively). The same pattern on the levels of NSE on the third day of life was also observed between (a) neonates with IVH and all other neonates (PVL and control; p = 0.003), (b) neonates with II–IV degree IVH and all other neonates (p = 0.003), and (c) between control and the five (n = 5) neonates that died from the case group (p = 0.023). We conclude that NSE could be an effective and useful biomarker on the third day of life for the identification of preterm neonates at high risk of developing severe forms of IVH.

31 May 2024 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ETEVANGELOS TZAMAKOS
EVANGELOS TZAMAKOS
Dimitra MetallinouDimitra Metallinou
Dimitra Metallinou
Maria TigkaMaria Tigka
Maria Tigka
KLKaterina Lykeridou
Katerina Lykeridou
Antigoni SarantakiAntigoni Sarantaki
Antigoni Sarantaki
CNChristina Ioannis Nanou
Christina Ioannis Nanou
Midwives’ self-efficacy can significantly affect the provided care and, therefore, maternal and neonatal outcomes. The aim of the present study was to investigate associations of perceived self-efficacy with emotional intelligence, personality, resilience, and attitudes towards death among midwives in Greece. From 2020 to 2022, a total of 348 midwives were recruited in this descriptive cross-sectional study. The participants were employed as independent professionals, in public hospitals or regional health authorities. Data collection involved five research instruments: the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form (TEIQue-SF), the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ), the Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC), and the Death Attitude Profile-Revised (DAP-R) scale. The mean score for the GSES was 29.1 (SD = 4.2), suggesting a moderately elevated level of self-efficacy among midwives. The results revealed that higher scores on the GSES were significantly associated with higher scores on the Extraversion subscale (p < 0.001) and lower scores on the Neuroticism (p < 0.001) and Lie (p = 0.002) subscales of the EPQ. Additionally, high self-efficacy was significantly correlated with high emotional intelligence (p < 0.001), high neutral acceptance of death (p = 0.009), and high resilience (p < 0.001). These findings highlight the relationship between the self-efficacy of Greek midwives and various psychological factors, as well as the multifaceted nature of self-efficacy and its importance for midwives’ psychological well-being and professional functioning.

ETEVANGELOS TZAMAKOS
EVANGELOS TZAMAKOS
Dimitra MetallinouDimitra Metallinou
Dimitra Metallinou
Antigoni SarantakiAntigoni Sarantaki
Antigoni Sarantaki
Maria TigkaMaria Tigka
Maria Tigka
KLKaterina Lykeridou
Katerina Lykeridou
CNChristina Ioannis Nanou
Christina Ioannis Nanou
Midwifery practice inevitably includes miscarriages, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between attitudes toward death and emotional intelligence, personality, resilience, and justice beliefs among midwives in Greece. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from 2020 to 2022 among 348 midwives employed in public hospitals, in regional health authorities, or as independent professionals. Research instruments included the Death Attitude Profile—Revised, the Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale, the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire—Short Form, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, and the Belief in a Just World scale. The results revealed that greater emotional intelligence was significantly associated with higher scores in the escape acceptance subscale. Midwives scored low on the neutral acceptance subscale (2.9 ± 0.8), with the highest score being recorded in the escape acceptance subscale (4.6 ± 1.0), which was significantly associated with greater emotional intelligence. Neuroticism was significantly associated with the death avoidance, approach acceptance, fear of death, and escape acceptance subscales. Finally, the subscale of distributive justice beliefs for self and others was significantly associated with the subscales of death avoidance and approach acceptance. These findings highlight the nuanced perspectives within the healthcare community. As we delve deeper into the complexities of end-of-life care, understanding these diverse attitudes is crucial for providing comprehensive and empathetic support to both patients and healthcare professionals.

22 January 2026 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KΚKokkinari Artemisia Κοκκιναρη
Kokkinari Artemisia Κοκκιναρη
Maria DaglaMaria Dagla
Maria Dagla
KGKleanthi Gourounti
Kleanthi Gourounti
Evangelia AntoniouEvangelia Antoniou
Evangelia Antoniou
NTNikoleta Tsinisizeli
Nikoleta Tsinisizeli
Georgios IatrakisGeorgios Iatrakis
Georgios Iatrakis
Background: Nutrition during the perinatal period, including pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum, and lactation, is a critical determinant of maternal and neonatal health. While the importance of balanced nutrition is well established, the integration of nutritional counseling into midwifery care remains inconsistent across settings. Evidence suggests that midwives are uniquely positioned to deliver nutrition-related support, yet gaps persist in their formal training and in the availability of structured guidance. These gaps are particularly evident in certain regions, such as Greece, where dedicated national guidelines for perinatal nutrition are lacking. Methods: This systematized narrative review synthesises evidence from studies published between 2010 and 2025, retrieved through PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and relevant national guidelines. Although the synthesis draws on diverse study designs to provide contextual depth, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were prioritized and synthesized separately to evaluate the effectiveness of midwife-led interventions. In total, ten randomized controlled trials were included in the evidence synthesis, alongside additional observational and qualitative studies that informed the narrative analysis. Both international and Greek literature were examined to capture current practices, challenges, and knowledge gaps in the nutritional dimension of midwifery care. Results: Findings indicate that adequate intake of macronutrients and micronutrients, including iron, folic acid, vitamin D, iodine, calcium, and omega-3 fatty acids, is essential for optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes. Despite this, studies consistently report insufficient nutritional knowledge among midwives, limited confidence in providing counseling, and variability in clinical practice. Socio-cultural factors, such as dietary traditions and migration-related challenges, further influence nutritional behaviors and access to guidance. Emerging approaches, including e-health tools, group counseling models, and continuity-of-care frameworks, show promise in enhancing midwives’ capacity to integrate nutrition into perinatal care. Conclusion: Nutrition is a cornerstone of perinatal health, and midwives are strategically placed to address it. However, gaps in training, inconsistent guidelines, and cultural barriers limit the effectiveness of current practices. Strengthening midwifery education in nutrition, developing context-specific tools, and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration are essential steps toward more comprehensive and culturally sensitive perinatal care. Future research should focus on longitudinal and intervention studies that assess the impact of midwife-led nutritional counseling on maternal and neonatal outcomes.