Drug-induced myopathies are a common cause of muscle pain, and the range of drugs that can cause muscle side effects is constantly expanding. In this article, the authors comprehensively discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic process in patients with myalgia, and present the spectrum of drug-induced myopathies. The review provides a detailed analysis of the literature on the incidence of myopathy during treatment with hypolipemic drugs, beta-blockers, amiodarone, colchicine, glucocorticosteroids, antimalarials, cyclosporine, zidovudine, and checkpoint inhibitors, a group of drugs increasingly used in the treatment of malignancies. The article considers the clinical course of the different types of myopathies, their pathogenesis, histopathological features, and treatment methods of these disorders. The aim of this paper is to gather from the latest available literature up-to-date information on the course, pathophysiology, and therapeutic options of drug-induced myopathies, to systematize the knowledge of drug-induced myopathies and to draw the attention of internists to the fact that these clinical issues are an important therapeutic problem.

The popularity of esthetic medicine is growing every year, also among patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIRD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of esthetic medicine (AM) procedures in patients with AIRD. A semi-structured, anonymous questionnaire regarding rheumatic and concomitant diseases and AM procedures was distributed among adult patients hospitalized in the rheumatology department or attending outpatient clinic in the National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation, Warsaw. The main outcome was the occurrence of an adverse event. A number of 512 patients took part in the survey and 15 were excluded (AM procedure preceded the diagnosis of AIRD). The study group consisted of 497 patients, of whom 47 had undergone AM procedures. The procedures performed included: tattooing (22 patients), piercing (16 patients), hyaluronic acid (7 patients), botulinum toxin (5 patients) injections, laser procedures (6 patients), plastic surgery (4 patients), mesotherapy (3 patients) and others. The vast majority of patients had these performed during remission or low disease activity. 70.2% of patients received treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) during the AM procedure, with TNF-alfa inhibitors being the most common (63.6%). Adverse events occurred in 15% of patients. All were mild and transient site reactions. Most patients would like to repeat the AM procedure in the future. The use of esthetic medicine procedures in patients with AIRD, including those treated with biologic DMARDs, was associated with a risk of mild site reactions. Most of the patients expressed satisfaction with the results of the AM procedure.

Difficult-to-treat systemic lupus erythematosus (D2T-SLE) remains a major unmet challenge in contemporary lupus care, yet it continues to be defined predominantly by clinical non-response rather than underlying biology. Current biomarkers largely quantify inflammatory burden, immune complex activity, or organ damage and do not reliably capture persistent activation of pathogenic pathways under therapy. Emerging multi-omics, single-cell, and longitudinal studies suggest that, in a subset of patients, apparent treatment failure may reflect incomplete attenuation of dominant immune circuits rather than uniformly elevated inflammation. We propose molecular refractoriness in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) as sustained, pathway-level immune activity despite apparently adequate, mechanism-directed therapy. We outline the major immune programs implicated in this process—including interferon-enriched, B-cell/plasmablast-associated, neutrophil extracellular trap (NET)-related, cytotoxic T-cell, and cytokine-associated states—and discuss their relevance for biomarker development and precision trial design. Importantly, we emphasize that interferon gene signatures (IGS) should be interpreted as context-dependent and non-specific markers of interferon responsiveness, reflecting combined activity of type I, II, and III interferons, and functioning primarily as predictive rather than mechanistic biomarkers. We further highlight critical limitations of a purely endotype-based model, including the need to distinguish true molecular refractoriness from damage-dominant and pseudo-refractory states, as well as the emerging role of immune-reset strategies such as cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, which may overcome refractoriness independently of specific pathway dominance. These observations suggest that difficult-to-treat SLE encompasses biologically heterogeneous states that may not be fully captured by pathway-resolved stratification alone. Reframing D2T-SLE as a biologically heterogeneous state of incomplete immune attenuation may help bridge the gap between clinical treatment failure and mechanism-informed precision medicine in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Introduction: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) manifests with thrombosis and pregnancy losses and may significantly impair the health-related quality of life (HRQoL). So far, APS has been perceived as a less burdensome disease than systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but data on this are scarce. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate HRQoL in APS patients by applying the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) and World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale (WHOQoL-BREF); to examine the impact of primary APS and with coexisting SLE (APS/SLE) on patient HRQoL; and to provide a description of the APS patient population.Material and methods: One hundred twelve patients with APS were included in the study, 57 of them with primary APS and 55 with coexisting SLE. HRQoL was measured by the 36-Item SF-36 and WHOQoL questionnaires.Results: Mean age was 47 years (47.6 ±13.8), and 96 patients were (85.7%) women. The mean disease duration was 72 months. Health-related quality of life impairment was found in both components for all APS patients in comparison to the healthy Polish population (p < 0.0001). There was no diffe­rence between APS and APS/SLE groups in HRQoL (mental component p = 1.0, physical component p = 0.337). The history of venous thrombosis was associated with HRQoL impairment only in the APS/SLE group in the physical component (p = 0.0118), not in primary APS (p = 0.6862). The mental component of SF-36 was associated with all domains of WHOQoL-BREF, while the physical component was associated only with physical health (p < 0.001).Conclusions: Primary APS and APS secondary to SLE lead to equal impairment in HRQoL. Diagnosis and proper management of all patients with APS are essential to prevent thrombosis and miscarriages, which ultimately will lead to longer survival with optimal life quality.

Objectives: We aimed to quantify the damage burden measured using the Damage Index for Antiphospholipid Syndrome (DIAPS) in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and identify patients with high damage as well as any correlations of damage with subclinical atherosclerosis. Methods: Patient damage was assessed via DIAPS. Based on demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics, patients were divided into two subgroups: thrombotic APS patients with high vs. low damage, and non-thrombotic aPL-positive patients with vs. without damage. Participants underwent carotid/femoral ultrasound for atherosclerotic plaque detection and carotid–femoral and carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (PWV). Results: We included 112 patients with an APS diagnosis, 57 (50.9%) with primary APS and 55 (49.1%) with associated SLE. Cardiovascular (CVD) risk factors and complications were significantly more frequent in the thrombotic group, as well as in patients with high damage within the thrombotic group. We did not identify any risk factors for increased damage in the non-thrombotic group. Atherosclerotic plaque presence was present in 27 (24%) of the patients in this study with the same frequency in the APS and APS/SLE groups (p = 0.5446). Pulse wave velocity (PWV) was elevated in 27–32% patients according to analyzed arteries. Elevated PWV was more frequent in the APS group in comparison to APS/SLE only between carotid and radial arteries (p = 0.0012). Both atherosclerotic plaque presence and PWV did not correlate with damage severity. Conclusions: DIAPS indicates substantial damage in APS patients in our study. High organ damage mainly affected thrombotic patients and was related to CVD complications. At the same time, screening of subclinical atherosclerosis seems not to predict higher damage in APS patients.