Hip fractures are among the most serious health events in older adults, frequently leading to disability, loss of independence, and elevated mortality. In 2019, an estimated 9.6 million new cases occurred globally among adults aged ≥ 55 years, with an incidence rate of 681 per 100,000. Despite improved surgical care, one-year mortality remains high (15–30%), and fewer than half of survivors regain their pre-fracture functional status. Traditionally regarded as mechanical injuries, hip fractures are now increasingly recognized as systemic events reflecting and accelerating biological vulnerability and frailty progression. We synthesize evidence across biological, clinical, and social domains to explore the systemic implications of hip fracture, from the acute catabolic response and immune dysfunction to long-term functional decline. The concept of intrinsic capacity, introduced by the World Health Organization, offers a resilience-based framework to assess the multidimensional impact of hip fracture on physical, cognitive, and psychological function. We highlight the importance of orthogeriatric co-management, early surgical intervention, and integrated rehabilitation strategies tailored to the individual’s functional reserves and personal goals. Innovations such as digital health tools, biological aging biomarkers, and personalized surgical approaches represent promising avenues to enhance recovery and autonomy. Ultimately, we advocate for a shift toward interdisciplinary, capacity-oriented models of care that align with the goals of healthy aging and enable recovery that transcends survival, focusing instead on restoring function and quality of life.

Chronic inflammation is a pivotal driver in the progression of atherosclerosis, significantly contributing to the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Patients with chronic inflammatory diseases, such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) (e.g., ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease), rheumatological disorders, as well as individuals with auto-immune diseases (such as systemic lupus erythematosus), present a higher risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Despite their elevated CVD risk, these populations remain underrepresented in cardiovascular research, leading to a critical underestimation of their cardiovascular risk (CVR) in clinical practice. Furthermore, even recent CVR scores poorly predict the risk of events in these specific populations. This narrative review examines the physiopathological mechanisms linking chronic inflammation, immunomodulation, atherosclerosis, thrombosis and cardiovascular events. We review data from epidemiological studies and clinical trials to explore the potential cardiovascular benefits of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory therapies. Despite existing evidence, significant gaps in knowledge remain. Future research is mandatory, focusing on innovative strategies for risk stratification and optimization, including lipidomics, proteomics, advanced inflammatory markers, microbiota profiling, and cardiovascular imaging. Addressing these unmet needs will enhance understanding of cardiovascular risk in chronic inflammatory diseases, enabling tailored interventions and better outcomes.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), also known as Hughes syndrome, is an acquired autoimmune and procoagulant condition that predisposes individuals to recurrent thrombotic events and obstetric complications. Central is the role of three types of antiphospholipid antibodies that target phospholipid-binding proteins: lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anti-β2-glycoprotein I (β2-GPI-Ab), and anti-cardiolipin (aCL). Together with clinical data, these antibodies are the diagnostic standard. However, the diagnosis of APS in older adults may be challenging and, in the diagnostic workup of thromboembolic complications, it is an underestimated etiology. The therapeutic management of APS requires distinguishing two groups with differential risks of thromboembolic complications. The standard therapy is based on low-dose aspirin in the low-risk group and vitamin K antagonists in the high-risk group. The value of direct oral anticoagulants is currently controversial. The potential role of monoclonal antibodies is investigated. For example, rituximab is currently recommended in catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Research is ongoing on other monoclonal antibodies, such as daratumumab and obinutuzumab. This narrative review illustrates the pathophysiological mechanisms of APS, with a particular emphasis on cardiovascular complications and their impact in older adults. This article also highlights advancements in the diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of APS.

Fecal calprotectin (FC) has been largely recognized as a surrogate marker of intestinal neutrophilic inflammation, very reliable in distinguishing between inflammatory bowel diseases and functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. Aging has been suggested to influence FC results and their diagnostic accuracy; however, no studies are specifically targeted on this focus. In a retrospective study, we evaluated the eventual age-differences of the diagnostic accuracy of FC in discriminating between organic-inflammatory GI diseases and functional GI disorders. In 573 younger and 172 older (≥65 years) subjects undergoing an FC assay, we found that the latter showed higher median FC values, 72 (25–260) µg/g vs. 47 (25–165) µg/g (p < 0.01). Younger patients were more commonly affected by IBDs, while colorectal cancer and high-risk polyps, infective colitis, and diverticular disease represented the most common findings in the older subgroup. However, the estimated optimum FC threshold in discriminating between organic-inflammatory GI diseases and functional GI disorders was quite similar between the two groups (109 μg/g for the younger subgroup and 98 μg/g for the older subgroup), maintaining a very high specificity. In conclusion, we show that FC also represents a very specific test for intestinal inflammation in older patients, at similar threshold levels to younger subjects.

Vaccines prevent a significant number of deaths annually. However, certain populations do not respond adequately to vaccination due to impaired immune systems. Cirrhosis, a condition marked by a profound disruption of immunity, impairs the normal immunization process. Critical vaccines for cirrhotic patients, such as the hepatitis A virus (HAV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), influenza, pneumococcal, and coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19), often elicit suboptimal responses in these individuals. The humoral response, essential for immunization, is less effective in cirrhosis due to a decline in B memory cells and an increase in plasma blasts, which interfere with the creation of a long-lasting response to antigen vaccination. Additionally, some T cell subtypes exhibit reduced activation in cirrhosis. Nonetheless, the persistence of memory T cell activity, while not preventing infections, may help to attenuate the severity of diseases in these patients. Alongside that, the impairment of innate immunity, particularly in dendritic cells (DCs), prevents the normal priming of adaptive immunity, interrupting the immunization process at its onset. Furthermore, cirrhosis disrupts the gut–liver axis balance, causing dysbiosis, reduced production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), increased intestinal permeability, and bacterial translocation. Undermining the physiological activity of the immune system, these alterations could impact the vaccine response. Enhancing the understanding of the molecular and cellular factors contributing to impaired vaccination responses in cirrhotic patients is crucial for improving vaccine efficacy in this population and developing better prevention strategies.