Jakub Pazdrowski

Dr. Jakub Pazdrowski


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 April 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMateusz Szewczyk
Mateusz Szewczyk
JPJakub Pazdrowski
Jakub Pazdrowski
PPPiotr Pieńkowski
Piotr Pieńkowski
BWBartosz Wojtera
Bartosz Wojtera
BWBarbara Więckowska
Barbara Więckowska
Wojciech GolusiñskiWojciech Golusiñski
Wojciech Golusiñski
In patients with oral cancer, the risk factors for local, regional, and distant recurrence according to margin status have not been well established. We aimed to determine the risk factors for recurrence by margin status and to identify a margin cut-off point for improved survival in patients with close margins. We retrospectively reviewed adult patients treated at our centre from 2009 to 2021 for primary oral cancer. Margins were classified as positive (5 mm). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. A total of 326 patients (210 men) were included. The mean age was 59.1 years. Margin status was close (n = 168, 51.5%), clear (n = 83, 25.4%), or positive (n = 75, 23.0%). In the univariate analysis, positive surgical margins (HR = 7.53) had the greatest impact on distant failure. Positive surgical margins—without nodal involvement—had the greatest impact on the risk of distant failure. In the close margin group, the optimal cut-off for disease-free survival (AUC = 0.58) and overall survival (AUC = 0.63) was a deep margin > 3 mm, with survival outcomes that were comparable to the clear margin group. These finding suggest that margins < 5 mm may be sufficient in certain well-defined cases. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Aleksandra Wiktoria BratborskaAleksandra Wiktoria Bratborska
Aleksandra Wiktoria Bratborska
PGPaweł Głuszak
Paweł Głuszak
MJMaria Joks
Maria Joks
JKJoanna Kaźmierska
Joanna Kaźmierska
JPJakub Pazdrowski
Jakub Pazdrowski
Aleksandra Dańczak-PazdrowskaAleksandra Dańczak-Pazdrowska
Aleksandra Dańczak-Pazdrowska
Radiotherapy (RT) is a treatment method commonly used in oncology. A vast majority of patients undergoing RT suffer from radiation-induced skin injury (RISI), which results from complex biochemical reactions in the irradiated skin. Current strategies for preventing and managing RISI are insufficient for achieving full skin regeneration. Multiple studies have shown that alterations in the skin microbiome correlate with the development and severity of RISI. These studies suggest that dysbiosis is a crucial factor in promoting radiation-associated dermatitis. Targeting the skin microbiota presents a potential therapeutic approach that could significantly improve the quality of life for patients undergoing RT. This review aims to present current findings on the interplay between the skin microbiome and radiation-induced skin damage as well as to discuss potential therapeutic strategies for preventing and mitigating this condition.

29 April 2024 in Medicina
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJakub Pazdrowski
Jakub Pazdrowski
APAdriana Polanska
Adriana Polanska
JKJoanna Kaźmierska
Joanna Kaźmierska
MKMichał J. Kowalczyk
Michał J. Kowalczyk
MSMateusz Szewczyk
Mateusz Szewczyk
Aleksandra Dańczak-PazdrowskaAleksandra Dańczak-Pazdrowska
Aleksandra Dańczak-Pazdrowska
Background and Objectives: Chronic radiotherapy-induced skin injury (cRISI) is an irreversible and progressive condition that can significantly impact a patient’s quality of life. Despite the limited literature available on the assessment of the epidermal barrier in cRISI, there is a consensus that appropriate skincare, including the use of emollients, is the primary therapeutic approach for this group of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biophysical properties of the skin during the late period (at least 90 days) following radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. Materials and Methods: This was a single-center prospective non-randomized study. It involved the analysis of 16 adult patients with head and neck cancer who underwent RT at the Greater Poland Cancer Center, along with 15 healthy volunteers. The study and control groups were matched for gender and age (p = 0.51). Clinical assessment, based on the LENT-SOMA scale, was conducted for all patients. Evaluation of the skin’s biophysical properties included: an analysis of transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum hydration (SCH), and skin visualization using high-frequency ultrasonography (HF-USG). Results: A significantly higher TEWL was observed in the irradiated area compared to the control area in the study group (p = 0.004). However, there was no statistically significant difference in SCH (p = 0.073). Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the values of TEWL and SCH in the irradiated area between the group of patients with and without clinically obvious RISI (p = 0.192 and p = 0.415, respectively). The skin thickness of the irradiated area, assessed by HF-USG, did not differ significantly from the skin thickness of the control area (p = 0.638). Furthermore, no difference in skin thickness was observed in patients with clinical features of cRISI in the irradiated and control areas (p = 0.345). The mean time after RT was 6.1 years. Conclusions: This study marks the first demonstration of epidermal barrier damage in patients in the long term following RT for head and neck cancer. The impairment of the epidermal barrier was observed independently of evident cRISI features. This observation underscores the necessity to recommend appropriate skin care, including the use of emollients, for all patients following RT. We also suggest that HF-USG examination is generally inconclusive in determining the degree of skin damage in the late period after RT.

6 June 2024 in Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JPJakub Pazdrowski
Jakub Pazdrowski
MSMateusz Szewczyk
Mateusz Szewczyk
PPPawel Pazdrowski
Pawel Pazdrowski
ASAgnieszka Seraszek-Jaros
Agnieszka Seraszek-Jaros
PNPatryk Niewinski
Patryk Niewinski
WGWojciech Golusiński
Wojciech Golusiński
Background: The behavior of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) of the head and neck remains poorly understood. There is much controversy regarding the risk of local and nodal recurrences, as well as individual/environmental factors that increase the risk, such as tumor size, perineural invasion, and the state of the immune system. The objective was to analyze factors influencing local and/or regional lymph node recurrence in patients with cSCC in the head and neck region. Material and methods: This retrospective single-centre study included 521 patients with cSCC of the head and neck region, with local recurrence observed in 11% and nodal recurrence in 5%. Various potential risk factors were analyzed. Results: Statistically significant risk factors for both local and nodal recurrence include: tumor recurrence (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001 respectively), tissue inflammation confirmed histopathologically (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0019, respectively), tumor size ≥ 10 mm (p = 0.018, p = 0.0056, respectively), invasion depth > 2 mm (p = 0.0238, p = 0.0031, respectively). Risk factors significant only for local recurrence include: surgical margins (p = 0.0056), tumor differentiation grade (p = 0.0149). No risk factors were found to be significant solely for nodal recurrence. Conclusion: The authors argue that, in addition to classically recognized risk factors for local and nodal recurrence, attention should be paid to the presence of tissue inflammation confirmed histopathologically. It is also suggested to consider a tumor size of 10mm as a threshold, increasing the risk of recurrence, instead of the frequently proposed 20 mm. Keywords: cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma local recurrence nodal recurrence risk factors

30 April 2025 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
Aleksandra Wiktoria BratborskaAleksandra Wiktoria Bratborska
Aleksandra Wiktoria Bratborska
PGPaweł Głuszak
Paweł Głuszak
MJMaria Joks
Maria Joks
JKJoanna Kaźmierska
Joanna Kaźmierska
JPJakub Pazdrowski
Jakub Pazdrowski
Aleksandra Dańczak-PazdrowskaAleksandra Dańczak-Pazdrowska
Aleksandra Dańczak-Pazdrowska
Radiotherapy (RT) is a commonly used treatment method in oncology. A vast majority of patients undergoing RT suffer from radiation-induced skin injury (RISI), which results from complex biochemical reactions in the irradiated skin. Current strategies for preventing and managing RISI are insufficient for achieving full skin regeneration. Multiple studies have shown that alterations in the skin microbiome correlate with the development and severity of RISI. These studies suggest that dysbiosis is a crucial factor in promoting radiation-associated dermatitis. Targeting the skin microbiota presents a potential therapeutic approach that could significantly improve the quality of life for patients undergoing RT. This review aims to present current findings on the interplay between the skin microbiome and radiation-induced skin damage, as well as to discuss potential therapeutic strategies for preventing and mitigating this condition.

1 September 2026 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMateusz Szewczyk
Mateusz Szewczyk
KPKrzysztof Przybylski
Krzysztof Przybylski
BNBartosz Nowak
Bartosz Nowak
BWBartosz Wojtera
Bartosz Wojtera
DWDominika Wojnar
Dominika Wojnar
JPJakub Pazdrowski
Jakub Pazdrowski
Background/Objectives: To evaluate the association between comorbidity burden, quantified using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients treated surgically for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC), and to determine whether this association is modified by tumor stage. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 325 patients treated with primary surgery for OCSCC at a single institution (2009–2021). CCI was scored excluding the index malignancy component and evaluated as a continuous variable. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models assessed the association between CCI and OS/DFS, including a formal CCI × stage interaction term. Kaplan–Meier curves stratified by CCI (>4 vs. ≤4) were generated separately in early- and advanced-stage subgroups and compared by log-rank test. Results: CCI was significantly associated with OS (HR 1.14 per point, 95% CI 1.04–1.25, p = 0.005) but not DFS (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.92–1.12, p = 0.768). A significant CCI × stage interaction was observed (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.68–0.99, p = 0.036): within early-stage patients, an elevated CCI (>4) was associated with a significantly worse 5-year OS (52.9% vs. 72.3%, p = 0.009), whereas no such difference was observed in advanced-stage patients (40.9% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.56). Conclusions: The comorbidity burden was associated with overall but not disease-free survival after surgery for OCSCC. The association differed by tumor stage and was most apparent in early-stage disease. A recurrence-based classification of deaths showed that non-cancer death accounted for a substantially larger share of mortality among early-stage than advanced-stage patients, supporting a competing-mortality mechanism; independently adjudicated cause-of-death data were not available to confirm this directly. CCI may provide additional prognostic information in early-stage OCSCC.