Background: To evaluate changes in pattern electroretinogram (pERG) and pattern visual evoked potentials (pVEP) in patients with long-lasting type 1 diabetes without diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods: Prospective study involving 92 eyes divided into two groups. The diabetic group included 46 eyes of 23 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1DM); the control group included 23 age-matched healthy subjects. pERG and pVEP were assessed using the RETI-port/scan21 recording software (version 1021.3.0.0). Results: Mean age was 48 ± 9.77 years for the diabetic group and 51.7 ± 4.75 years for the control group. The mean duration of diabetes was 28.88 ± 8.04 years. The mean HbA1c value was 7.29 ± 0.89%. There were no differences in the age or sex distribution. Regarding the pERG, T1DM patients exhibited a significant decrease in the amplitude of the P50 and N95 waves compared to the control group (p = 0.018 and p = 0.035, respectively), with no differences in the peak time of each component. pVEP showed no significant changes in either peak time or amplitude of the different components. Conclusions: Long-term T1DM patients without DR showed changes in the amplitude of pERG waves with preserved peak times. We did not observe modifications in pVEP. pERG may serve as a subclinical marker of ganglion cell damage in long-term T1DM patients.

Background/Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of two upper limb neurodynamic test 1 (ULNT1) sequences for detecting carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in patients with unilateral symptoms. The standard sequence (ULNT1-STD) and a distal-to-proximal sequence (ULNT1-DIST) were investigated. A local-initiated sequence may facilitate symptoms reproduction in CTS, and comparing the affected side with the unaffected side could improve the detection of altered median nerve mechanosensitivity when symptoms are not directly reproduced. Methods: A total of 134 consecutive patients with clinically suspected unilateral CTS were recruited. Nerve conduction studies were used as a reference test. Results: When considering only symptom reproduction as the criterion for a positive test, ULNT1-STD showed a sensitivity of 0.398 and a specificity of 0.780 (positive likelihood ratio [+LR]: 1.81; negative likelihood ratio [−LR]: 0.77); whereas ULNT1-DIST demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.548 with a specificity of 0.732 (+LR: 2.04; −LR: 0.62). When a positive test was defined by symptom reproduction or inter-limb asymmetry (in range of motion or sensory response), ULNT1-STD showed an improved sensitivity of 0.613 but a reduced specificity of 0.537 (+LR: 1.32; −LR: 0.72). In comparison, ULNT1-DIST increased its sensitivity to 0.871 with a specificity of 0.683 (+LR: 2.75; −LR: 0.19). Conclusions: ULNT1-DIST offers better diagnostic accuracy for CTS compared to the ULNT1-STD sequence, especially when interlimb asymmetries in range of motion or sensory response are considered. However, side-to-side comparisons have reduced utility in cases with bilateral symptoms, limiting their application in clinical practice.