Nicholas Dixon

Prof. Nicholas Dixon

School of Chemistry and Molecular Bioscience, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

52Years (1975-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 1975 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Nicholas DixonNicholas Dixon
Nicholas Dixon
CGCarlo Gazzola
Carlo Gazzola
RBRobert L. Blakeley
Robert L. Blakeley
BZBurt Zerner
Burt Zerner

1 October 2005 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CEChristopher M. Elvin
Christopher M. Elvin
ACAndrew G. Carr
Andrew G. Carr
MHMickey G. Huson
Mickey G. Huson
JMJane M. Maxwell
Jane M. Maxwell
RPRoger D. Pearson
Roger D. Pearson
Nicholas DixonNicholas Dixon
Nicholas Dixon

25 September 2001 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BDBrian P. Dalrymple
Brian P. Dalrymple
KKKritaya Kongsuwan
Kritaya Kongsuwan
GWGene Wijffels
Gene Wijffels
Nicholas DixonNicholas Dixon
Nicholas Dixon
PJPhilip A. Jennings
Philip A. Jennings
The interaction between DNA polymerases and sliding clamp proteins confers processivity in DNA synthesis. This interaction is critical for most DNA replication machines from viruses and prokaryotes to higher eukaryotes. The clamp proteins also participate in a variety of dynamic and competing protein–protein interactions. However, clamp-protein binding sequences have not so far been identified in the eubacteria. Here we show from three lines of evidence, bioinformatics, yeast two-hybrid analysis, and inhibition of protein–protein interaction by modified peptides, that variants of a pentapeptide motif (consensus QL[SD]LF) are sufficient to enable interaction of a number of proteins with an archetypal eubacterial sliding clamp (the β subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme). Representatives of this motif are present in most sequenced members of the eubacterial DnaE, PolC, PolB, DinB, and UmuC families of DNA polymerases and the MutS1 mismatch repair protein family. The component tripeptide DLF inhibits the binding of the α (DnaE) subunit of E. coli DNA polymerase III to β at μM concentration, identifying key residues. Comparison of the eubacterial, eukaryotic, and archaeal sliding clamp binding motifs suggests that the basic interactions have been conserved across the evolutionary landscape.

1 December 1980 in Canadian Journal of Biochemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Nicholas DixonNicholas Dixon
Nicholas Dixon
PRPeter W. Riddles
Peter W. Riddles
CGCarlo Gazzola
Carlo Gazzola
RBRobert L. Blakeley
Robert L. Blakeley
BZBurt Zerner
Burt Zerner
Acetamide and N-methylurea have been shown for the first time to be substrates for jack bean urease. In the enzymatic hydrolysis of urea, formamide, acetamide, and N-methylurea at pH 7.0 and 38 °C, kcat has the values 5870, 85, 0.55, and 0.075 s−1, respectively. The urease-catalyzed hydrolysis of all these substrates involves the active-site nickel ion(s). Enzymatic hydrolysis of the following compounds could not be detected: phenyl formate, p-nitroformanilide, trifluoroacetamide, p-nitrophenyl carbamate, thiourea, and O-methylisouronium ion. In the enzymatic hydrolysis of urea, the pH dependence of kcat between pH 3.4 and 7.8 indicates that at least two prototropic forms are active. Enzymatic hydrolysis of urea in the presence of methanol gave no detectable methyl carbamate. A mechanism of action for urease is proposed which involves initially an O-bonded complex between urea and an active-site Ni2+ ion and subsequently an O-bonded carbamato–enzyme intermediate.

1 April 1991 in Molecular Genetics and Genomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SVSubhash G. Vasudevan
Subhash G. Vasudevan
WAWilfred L. F. Armarego
Wilfred L. F. Armarego
DSDenis C. Shawl
Denis C. Shawl
PLPenelope E. Lilley
Penelope E. Lilley
Nicholas DixonNicholas Dixon
Nicholas Dixon
RPRobert K. Poole
Robert K. Poole

31 March 1998 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWM. C. J. Wilce
M. C. J. Wilce
CBCharles S Bond
Charles S Bond
Nicholas DixonNicholas Dixon
Nicholas Dixon
HFH. C. Freeman
H. C. Freeman
JGJ. M. Guss
J. M. Guss
Jacqueline WilceJacqueline Wilce
Jacqueline Wilce
The structure of the proline-specific aminopeptidase (EC 3.4.11.9 ) from Escherichia coli has been solved and refined for crystals of the native enzyme at a 2.0-Å resolution, for a dipeptide-inhibited complex at 2.3-Å resolution, and for a low-pH inactive form at 2.7-Å resolution. The protein crystallizes as a tetramer, more correctly a dimer of dimers, at both high and low pH, consistent with observations from analytical ultracentrifuge studies that show that the protein is a tetramer under physiological conditions. The monomer folds into two domains. The active site, in the larger C-terminal domain, contains a dinuclear manganese center in which a bridging water molecule or hydroxide ion appears poised to act as the nucleophile in the attack on the scissile peptide bond of Xaa-Pro. The metal-binding residues are located in a single subunit, but the residues surrounding the active site are contributed by three subunits. The fold of the protein resembles that of creatine amidinohydrolase (creatinase, not a metalloenzyme). The C-terminal catalytic domain is also similar to the single-domain enzyme methionine aminopeptidase that has a dinuclear cobalt center.