Stijn Vanheule

Prof. Stijn Vanheule

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 October 2006 in Journal of Clinical Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SVStijn Vanheule
Stijn Vanheule
MDMattias Desmet
Mattias Desmet
RMReitske Meganck
Reitske Meganck
SBStefan Bogaerts
Stefan Bogaerts

1 June 2008 in Assessment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SVStijn Vanheule
Stijn Vanheule
MDMattias Desmet
Mattias Desmet
HGHans Groenvynck
Hans Groenvynck
YRYves Rosseel
Yves Rosseel
JFJohnny Fontaine
Johnny Fontaine
The Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II) is a frequently used scale for measuring depressive severity. BDI-II data (404 clinical; 695 nonclinical adults) were analyzed by means of confirmatory factor analysis to test whether the factor structure model with a somatic-affective and cognitive component of depression, formulated by Beck and colleagues, has a good fit. We also evaluated 10 alternative models. The fit of Beck's model was not good for all criteria. Three of the alternative models had a better fit in both samples, but none of these met all criteria for good fit. Of the alternatives with a better fit, we selected the only model with unidimensional subscales, which assesses a somatic, affective, and cognitive dimension. For this model, which we recommend, as well as for Beck' original model, a good fitting structure containing 15 and 16 items was developed with an item-deletion algorithm.

1 June 2015 in Patient Education and Counseling
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KRKaatje Van Roy
Kaatje Van Roy
SVStijn Vanheule
Stijn Vanheule
RIRuth Inslegers
Ruth Inslegers

28 October 2018 in Journal of Clinical Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FTFemke Truijens
Femke Truijens
LHLevin Zühlke‐Van Hulzen
Levin Zühlke‐Van Hulzen
SVStijn Vanheule
Stijn Vanheule

1 December 2006 in Stress and Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SVStijn Vanheule
Stijn Vanheule
YRYves Rosseel
Yves Rosseel
PVPeter Vlerick
Peter Vlerick

9 December 2016 in Frontiers in Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SVStijn Vanheule
Stijn Vanheule
This paper studies how subjectivity in capitalist culture can be characterised. Building on Lacan’s later seminars XVI, XVII, XVIII and XIX, the author first outlines Lacan’s general discourse theory, which includes four characteristic discourses: the discourse of the master, the discourse of the university, the discourse of the hysteric and the discourse of the analyst. Next, the author explores the subjectivity and the mode of dealing with jouissance and semblance, which is entailed in a fifth type of discourse, the capitalist discourse, discussed by Lacan in 1972. Indeed, like the other discourses that Lacan discerns, the discourse of the capitalist can be thought of as a mode of dealing with the sexual non-rapport. It is argued that in the case of neurosis the discourse of the capitalist functions as an attempt to ignore the sexual non-rapport and the dimension of the unconscious. Psychosis, by contrast, is marked by an a priori exclusion from discourse. In that case, consumerist ways of relating to the other might offer a semblance, and thus the possibility of inventing a mode of relating to the other. Two clinical vignettes are presented to illustrate this perspective: one concerning the neurotic structure and one concerning the psychotic structure.