The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of soil water stability on maize (Zea mays L.) yield, water use, and its photosynthetic physiological mechanisms, and to innovate the relationship between maize and soil water, which currently only considers soil water content and neglects soil water stability. An organized water experiment was conducted on maize. The effects of stable soil water (SW) at two water content levels were examined, with fluctuating soil water (FW) as a control. The assessed effects included leaf water, chlorophyll, gas exchange, leaf water use efficiency (WUE), stable carbon isotope ratio (δ13C), and yield of maize. Soil water stability had a significant effect on maize yield, yet it was slightly smaller than soil water content. Compared with FW, SW increased the maximum net photosynthetic rate, saturated light intensity, stomatal conductance, SPAD, leaf water content, and leaf WUE, and decreased δ13C, promoting dry matter assimilation and conversion into grain yield, ultimately increasing yield by 100.8%. Under the same soil water stability, 55% FC versus 75% FC weakened photosynthetic capacity and exacerbated stomatal limitation of maize leaves, making them more susceptible to light inhibition, which decreased photoassimilate accumulation, resulting in a significant decrease in yield. And the δ13C under 75% FC conditions decreased by 4.7–7.7% compared with 55% FC. In conclusion, SW exhibits a positive effect on maize leaf water content, photosynthetic carbon assimilation, and grain yields, regardless of soil water content. Compared to FW, SW increased leaf WUE and maize yield by enhancing photosynthesis, and SW has stronger discrimination against 13C during photosynthetic CO2 assimilation, thus decreasing leaf δ13C. This study fills a gap in understanding how soil water stability influences maize yield and gas exchange, and provides a fresh perspective on how to improve crop yield and WUE by managing soil water stability.

Previous studies on soil water–plant relations have mostly focused on the soil water content (SWC), while the effect of soil moisture stability on plant growth has received surprisingly little attention. Potted tomato seedlings were used to examine the effect of stable soil moisture (SM) and fluctuating soil moisture (FM) on plant growth, development, and water use efficiency (WUE) in this study. The results showed that (i) soil moisture stability significantly affected the growth and development, photosynthetic characteristics, morphological traits, root morphology, and water physiological characteristics of seedling tomatoes, with SM being more conducive for most of these indices. (ii) SM improved the leaf WUE by reducing the content of abscisic acid in plants, regulating plant osmotic substances, maintaining a high gas exchange rate, and promoting plant morphology. (iii) SM could avoid water stress on tomato seedlings; even if the SWC of SM was equal to or lower than the SWC of FM, water stress would not occur under SM, whereas it would occur under FM. Overall, compared with FM, SM promoted beneficial plant morphology, maintained a high gas exchange rate, and did not induce water stress for tomato seedlings—ultimately improving WUE. This effect was more effective under low-SWC conditions than under high-SWC conditions. These findings provide a new perspective and theoretical basis for soil water–plant relations and indicate that SM has great potential in promoting plant growth and improving WUE.

Uneven rainfall, in the context of global warming, can cause soil moisture fluctuations (SMFs) that harm crop growth, and it is not yet known whether nitrogen (N) can mitigate the harm caused by a strong SMF. This paper uses okra as a test subject and sets three SMFs of 45–55% FC (W₁), 35–65% FC (W₂), and 25–75% FC (W₃) and three N applications of 0 kg hm⁻² (N₀), 110 kg hm⁻² (N₁), and 330 kg hm⁻² (N₂) to investigate the effects of SMF and N application on the physiological and biochemical aspects of okra. The results demonstrated that okra exhibited the highest values in stem diameter, number of leaves, photosynthesis characteristics, antioxidant enzyme activity, and yield under the N₁ treatment. The average yield in the N₁ treatment was 149.8 g, significantly surpassing the average yields of the N₀ (129.8 g) and N₃ (84.0 g) treatments. Stomatal density, antioxidant enzyme activity, malondialdehyde content, and proline content in okra leaves were highest in the W₃ treatment, indicating that plants experienced stress in the W₃ treatment. However, the agronomic traits and yields of okra in the N₁ treatment were higher than those in the N₀ and N₁ treatments, indicating that the crop damage caused by W₃ could be mitigated by an appropriate amount of N application. The N₁W₁ treatment emerged as the most suitable combination for okra growth in this study, exhibiting the highest stem diameter, leaf count, photosynthetic characteristics, and yield (201.3 g). Notably, this yield was 67.8% higher than the lowest treatment (N2W3), signifying a significant improvement.

Optimizing water and nitrogen (N) management is critical for enhancing crop productivity under water scarcity. This study aimed to determine if a high irrigation upper limit can compensate for a low lower limit and whether optimal N application can mitigate the impacts of a wide irrigation range in okra. A pot experiment was conducted with three irrigation ranges (defined by the lower and upper limits of soil field capacity, FC) and two N rates: W1 (45–55% FC), W2 (35–65% FC), W3 (25–75% FC) and N1 (110 kg ha⁻1), N2 (220 kg ha⁻1). Results demonstrated that a high upper limit could not compensate for the adverse effects of a low lower limit. The narrow irrigation range (W1) consistently outperformed wider ranges, increasing yield by up to 42.3% compared to the wide irrigation range (W3). Moderate N application (N1) effectively alleviated the impacts associated with W3, boosting its yield by 24.9%, whereas excessive N (N2) was often detrimental. The optimal W1N1 combination synergistically enhanced system performance, achieving the highest yield (56.7% greater than the poorest N2W3 treatment), improving fruit quality (e.g., 11.5% higher soluble sugar), and increasing soil urease activity by 25.9%. Conversely, N2 led to soil acidification and nutrient imbalance. These results demonstrate that coupling a narrow irrigation limit range with moderate N is an optimal strategy for enhancing okra productivity and soil health, providing a viable guide for sustainable cultivation.