Optimal myocardial reperfusion during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is increasingly recognized to be beyond restoring epicardial coronary flow. Both invasive and non-invasive tools have highlighted the limitation of using this metric, and more efforts are focused towards achieving optimal reperfusion at the level of the microcirculation. Recent data highlighted the close relationship between thrombus burden and impaired microcirculation in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Moreover, distal embolization was an independent predictor of mortality in patients with STEMI. Likewise, the development of no-reflow phenomenon has been directly linked with worse clinical outcomes. Adjunctive thrombus aspiration during pPCI is intuitively intended to remove atherothrombotic material to mitigate the risk of distal embolization and the no-reflow phenomenon (NRP). However, prior trials on the use of thrombectomy during pPCI did not support its routine use, with comparable clinical endpoints to patients who underwent PCI alone. This article aims to review the existing literature highlighting the limitation on the use of thrombectomy and provide future insights into trials investigating the role of thrombectomy in contemporary pPCI.

Cardiovascular computed tomography (CT) enables a non-invasive assessment of a multitude of cardiac ailments notably coronary, structural and congenital heart diseases, as well as valvular disorders and cardiomyopathies. Technological advancement, including machine learning and generative artificial intelligence (AI), has revolutionized the application of cardiac CT not only as a diagnostic tool but also to guide interventions. CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) to detect obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), determine plaque extension, volume and composition, quantify risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) and plan percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) or Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG). Additionally, CTCA can provide scoring tools to improve procedural success, and minimize complications of complex coronary interventions, such as chronic total occlusion (CTO) interventions. Moreover, cardiac CT aids in pre-procedural planning and assessment of interventions like transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Its ability to provide comprehensive anatomical and functional information makes it indispensable in guiding complex structural interventions and ensuring optimal patient outcomes. This review explores the evolving role of cardiac CT in coronary and structural heart disease interventions, highlighting its technological advancements, clinical applications, and future directions in cardiovascular care.

A man in late adolescence of Asian descent was admitted with cardiac-sounding chest pain and a history of flu-like symptoms a week prior to presentation with negative screening for the SARS-CoV-2 virus. His ECG showed lateral T-wave changes and pre-excitation pattern suggestive of an accessory pathway. High-sensitivity troponin T peak was significantly elevated to 2550 ng/L (normal reference range 0–11). He was initially treated for a suspected perimyocarditis. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction with regional wall motion abnormalities suggestive of coronary artery disease. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed subendocardial delayed gadolinium enhancement with ischaemia and viability in the left circumflex (LCx) territory. He was then sent for a CT coronary angiogram for a suspected spontaneous coronary artery dissection, and subsequently, he discussed with our team and accepted for immediate transfer. He underwent coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention to his LCx artery with a drug-coated balloon. Following that, and after a discussion with the electrophysiology team, he had an attempt at ablating his accessory pathway with partial success. He was discharged home in a stable condition.

Background: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) often coexist since they both share the same risk factors and pathophysiology. Patients with severe AS with prohibitive surgical risk are often treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a staged or concurrent procedure. Significant calcified CAD and left ventricular (LV) systolic impairment in such patients would add more challenges to the management. A clear consensus on the timing of revascularization of such patients in relation to the TAVI procedure is lacking. Case summary: Herein, we present an 86-year-old male who presented to a local district hospital with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (N-STEMI) and decompensated heart failure. His transthoracic echocardiography showed moderate LV systolic impairment with low-flow severe AS. He was initially treated with dual anti-platelet and diuretic therapy and subsequently underwent coronary angiography that revealed severe calcified shelf-like left main stem (LMS) and moderate left anterior descending (LAD) disease. He was successfully treated with TAVI and rotational atherectomy (RA)-assisted PCI to LMS and LAD in the same setting. Conclusion: There is limited evidence on effective strategies to tackle high-risk angioplasty with concurrent TAVI in patients with impaired LV function. We performed TAVI and RA to LMS and LAD in the same setting using no mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Management strategies should be individualized to highly selected patients taking into account LMS involvement, calcium modulation strategies, haemodynamic instability, or cardiogenic shock and whether MCS is needed.