For women diagnosed with cancer, side effects affecting their sexuality are extremely common and can be distressing and life-changing; however, most women are left in the dark without any guidance from their oncology teams regarding possible side effects and treatment options. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical guidelines provide guidance on the recommended assessments related to the domains of sexual function and their respective interventions. Despite the existence of these guidelines, the reality is that only a few women with cancer are asked about sexual concerns that result from cancer treatments. Common barriers to sexuality discussion reported by oncology providers include a lack of qualification and knowledge, not having a place to refer patients, and not knowing how to start the conversation. Social media remains a widely untapped resource regarding sexuality and cancer interventions, as people are increasingly turning to social media for health information and advice. This may be especially relevant for sexuality, as oncologists may not feel comfortable or well-trained to discuss the topic, and patients may be reluctant to bring up sexual concerns during their visits. Social media can play a critical role in studying sexual health and in sexuality interventions, particularly in adolescent and young adult patients with cancer. Here, we discuss the lack of inclusion regarding sexuality in oncology, the rates of sexual dysfunction in patients with cancer, treatment options for common sexual concerns, how to utilize the reach of various social media channels, and provide patient and provider resources.

Cancer disparities are well-established across measures of cancer incidence and mortality. Cholangiocarcinoma, a common hepatic malignancy, is no exception to these inequities. Globally and within the United States, Asian, Hispanic, and Indigenous peoples of the Americas, Alaskan Natives, and Pacific Islander populations experience higher incidence rates of cholangiocarcinoma. These same groups and non-Hispanic Black individuals simultaneously experience lower disease-specific survival, highlighting the role of social factors in cholangiocarcinoma outcome inequities. Higher age-standardized death rates from cholangiocarcinoma are associated with a lower social determinant index (SDI) in Andean Latin America, Southern Latin America, and Central sub-Saharan Africa. SDI, which evaluates education, fertility, and income, can be used to model the social determinants of health (SDOH). The SDOH also affect cholangiocarcinoma survival in the United States as factors such as migratory status, insurance status, and geographic location can cause treatment delays and worsened outcomes. Despite these inequities, limited research exists on the topic of disparities in cholangiocarcinoma when compared with other malignancies, and clinical trial under-representation remains a significant concern. Representing diverse populations in cholangiocarcinoma clinical trials is exceedingly important as populations with the highest incidence are simultaneously under-represented in clinical trials. Diversity in clinical trial enrollment and research regarding cholangiocarcinoma is needed to create robust databases and biobanks that can be used to develop targeted treatments and guidelines. In addition, risk factors, including parasitic infections, infectious diseases, and environmental exposures, are associated with cholangiocarcinoma but vary by global region, highlighting the need to study unique risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma across diverse populations. Without research that represents the populations that suffer most from this cancer, incidence and mortality inequities will continue to have a disproportionate burden.

Precision immuno-oncology involves the development of personalized cancer treatments that are influenced by the unique nature of an individual’s DNA, immune cells, and their tumor’s molecular characterization. Biological sex influences immunity; females typically mount stronger innate and adaptive immune responses than males. Though more research is warranted, we continue to observe an enhanced benefit for females with lung cancer when treated with combination chemoimmunotherapy in contrast to the preferred approach of utilizing immunotherapy alone in men. Despite the observed sex differences in response to treatments, women remain underrepresented in oncology clinical trials, largely as a result of gender-biased misconceptions. Such exclusion has resulted in the development of less efficacious treatment guidelines and clinical recommendations and has created a knowledge gap in regard to immunotherapy-related survivorship issues such as fertility. To develop a more precise approach to care and overcome the exclusion of women from clinical trials, flexible trial schedules, multilingual communication strategies, financial, and transportation assistance for participants should be adopted. The impact of intersectionality and other determinants of health that affect the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in women must also be considered in order to develop a comprehensive understanding of the unique impact of immunotherapy in all women with lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Although international medical graduates (IMGs) and Puerto Rican Medical Graduates (PRMGs) comprise an integral part of the health care workforce, these individuals, particularly women, frequently face numerous types of discrimination throughout medical training and independent practice. To our knowledge, we conducted the first cross-sectional study to understand the journeys and consequences of migration faced by IMGs and PRMGs in the US oncology workforce. METHODS: We developed a cross-sectional, online survey consisting of 51 multiple choice and open-ended questions that captured demographic information, professional status, period of migration to the United States, location within the United States that participants migrated to, reasons for migration, cultural adaptation, experiences of discrimination during training, and overall professional experiences in the United States. RESULTS: The majority of participants cited better education, professional gains, and a lack of opportunities in participants' home country as primary reasons for migration to the United States. However, most participants, particularly women, experienced staunch assimilation to fit the mold of professional American standards; women were also particularly likely to report experiences of racial/ethnic, language, and gender discrimination during oncology training in the United States, which only marginally improved during independent practice. Despite such discrimination, most participants reported excellent professional satisfaction during training and independent practice, although only moderate personal satisfaction. Most participants decided to stay in the United States, citing reasons pertaining to enhanced professional opportunities, whereas those that returned home valued reasons relating to family and quality of life. CONCLUSION: Our sobering findings underscore the need for institutional enforcement of an inclusive environment encompassing cultural humility, enactment of programs addressing barriers to socialization, immigration laws, and financial support, creation of IMG-specific support networks, and the sponsorship and promoting of minority women physicians.

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) is a heterogeneous malignancy with diverse molecular subtypes that influence prognosis and treatment response. While conventional therapies such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation remain the mainstay of treatment, recurrent and metastatic EC poses significant therapeutic challenges, particularly in aggressive histologic subtypes like clear cell carcinoma. Advances in genomic profiling have revealed that KRAS mutations occur in approximately 10%–30% of EC cases, with the KRAS G12C variant representing a rare but potentially targetable alteration. KRAS G12C inhibitors, including sotorasib and adagrasib, have revolutionized the treatment landscape for certain malignancies, particularly non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), where they have received FDA approval. The efficacy of these agents in other KRAS G12C–mutated solid tumors remains under investigation, with limited clinical data available in endometrial cancer. To date, only three documented cases have reported responses to KRAS G12C inhibitors in EC, highlighting the need for further exploration of targeted strategies in this setting. Here, we present a unique case of a 77‐year‐old woman with metastatic endometrial clear cell carcinoma who exhibited a durable response to adagrasib after progressing on multiple lines of standard treatment. This case highlights the potential clinical utility of KRAS G12C inhibitors in EC and highlights the importance of molecular profiling in identifying actionable mutations that may guide treatment decisions. This report, contributing to the limited body of evidence that includes three prior cases evaluating the role of sotorasib and adagrasib across several solid malignancies, highlights the clinical and translational relevance of adagrasib in advancing precision‐targeted therapy for KRAS G12C–mutated tumors.